Started By
Message

Young Washington - Trailer.

Posted on 10/13/25 at 1:27 pm
Posted by Handsome Pete
Member since Apr 2019
2194 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 1:27 pm
I haven't been interested in previous Angel Studios movies. But this looks great.

Posted by BayouBengal51
Forest Hill, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2006
7274 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 2:02 pm to
Might be the first time I see a movie in the theater in a loooong time. Looks good.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74469 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Here comes the Gen-er-AL!


I am so there.
Posted by Shwapp
Gonzales, LA
Member since Sep 2016
1004 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 2:07 pm to
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
12686 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 2:14 pm to
So Washington was basically an action movie hero? I love the guy but always thought his military service in the French/Indian War was more of a learning experience than a violent heroic adventure.
Posted by LB84
Member since May 2016
4336 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 2:39 pm to
At the Battle of the Monongahela he had 2 horses shot from under him and 4 bullet holes in his coat. Was completely unharmed. In his journal he wrote about how providence was with him.
This post was edited on 10/13/25 at 2:41 pm
Posted by Potchafa
Avoyelles
Member since Jul 2016
4140 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:04 pm to
Holy frick sticks. No blacks?
Posted by cinemaguy23
Member since Apr 2025
285 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:34 pm to
awesome
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
193992 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

At the Battle of the Monongahela he had 2 horses shot from under him and 4 bullet holes in his coat. Was completely unharmed. In his journal he wrote about how providence was with him.


in a letter to his brother


Their British saw something in Washington I mean Fort Necessity was a bit of a **** **** but Washington just happened to be the commander of a bad situation and he didn't speak French
Posted by LB84
Member since May 2016
4336 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

Holy frick sticks. No blacks?


WTF are you talking about?
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
64136 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 12:45 am to
This is probably AS most ambitious project to date. A1 actors and looks like they went in on special effects. Hopefully Americans celebrate the 250th anniversary of America the right way. This is one worth seeing in theaters.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
134907 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 5:13 am to
That looks good
Posted by StrongOffer
Member since Sep 2020
6208 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 9:05 am to
I've been wanting to research if this story is written anywhere, but very cool story Ben Carson tells about GW.

Posted by StrongOffer
Member since Sep 2020
6208 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 9:05 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/14/25 at 9:06 am
Posted by StrongOffer
Member since Sep 2020
6208 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 9:05 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/14/25 at 9:06 am
Posted by BigAppleTiger
New York City
Member since Dec 2008
10896 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

Holy frick sticks. No blacks?



Well lf they go as far as the Battle of Yorktown there should be at least one black.



Born into slavery around 1760, James Armistead lived most of his life on a plantation in New Kent, Virginia. During the American Revolution, however, James received permission from his master, William Armistead, to enlist in the Marquis de Lafayette’s French Allied units. Here, the army dispatched Armistead as a spy, playing the role of a runaway slave to gain access to General Cornwallis’s headquarters. Because Armistead was a native Virginian with extensive knowledge of the terrain, the British received him without suspicion. As a result, Armistead accomplished what few spies could: direct access to the center of the British War Department.

After successfully infiltrating British intelligence, Armistead floated freely between the British and American camps. As a double agent, he relayed critical information to Lafayette and misleading intel to the enemy. Oblivious to his true intentions, the British assigned Armistead to work under the notorious turncoat, Benedict Arnold. By helping Arnold maneuver his troops through Virginia, Armistead gained significant insight into the Redcoats’ movements.

Several of Armistead’s finest acts occurred in 1781, during a critical moment in the Revolution—the Battle of Yorktown. The spy informed Lafayette and Washington about approaching British reinforcements, which allowed the generals to devise a blockade impeding enemy advancements. This success resulted in the final major victory for the colonists when Lord Cornwallis surrendered on October 17, 1781.

American Battlefield Trust
Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
24831 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

in a letter to his brother


Their British saw something in Washington I mean Fort Necessity was a bit of a **** **** but Washington just happened to be the commander of a bad situation and he didn't speak French


had it not been for New York during the revolution, Washington would have gone down as one of the greatest military minds of his era. We think of Washington as this old man, but he was only in his early 40s during the revolution. There are multiple reports of Washington being shot through his coat and horses shot from under him without getting a scratch.

As to the action star comments, well yes, he was one of the biggest men in Virginia during this time and was considered the finest horsemen of his era. Dude was a brick shithouse in the 1750s when most men stood about 5' 6" tall. He would look to them like the guy playing Jack Reecher today looks to us...
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
12686 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

had it not been for New York during the revolution, Washington would have gone down as one of the greatest military minds of his era. We think of Washington as this old man, but he was only in his early 40s during the revolution. There are multiple reports of Washington being shot through his coat and horses shot from under him without getting a scratch.


I've read some good biographies about him and these opinions are your own. He was a great man though.
Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
24831 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 3:31 pm to
GW military tactics were on par with his contemporaries. His greatest trait was leadership in the field. He was a great military leader, when he had resources. It is the vogue of historians in the 20th century to write GW as average general that outlasted the British. Uh, no.

1. He commissioned and sent out Knox to Ticonderoga and basically took Boston without basically firing a shot. He completely out maneuvered the British by placing those cannons on Dorchester Heights.

2. He commissioned Daniel Morgan as basically the worlds first special forces to attack the British. If not for Danial Morgan and Arnold, the Battle of Saratoga would not have been a victory bring the French into the war. Also credit DM with a big reason we won the Battle of Cowpens which collapsed Cornwallis's left flank.

3. He appointed Nathanial Green in charge of the southern campaign. That lead to ultimate victory.

4. After the defeat in New York, he made the months of Dec 1776 and Jan 1777 a nightmare for the British. He out maneuvered the best British generals in the Trenton-Princeton campaigns with fewer troops and resources.

5. He was smart enough to recognize the position that Cornwallis was in after Tarlton's defeat at Cowpens. He tricked Clinton into thinking he was still in New York while moving south to attack Cornwallis in Yorktown with French naval support.

6. He was the spy master of the revolution. Washington's spies are not just a series, it was completely real. He out maneuvered the British consistently.

7. His biggest victory was keeping Clinton in New York. He managed to keep enough threat for Clinton in the north for so long, the British were willing to give up all the northern colonies and try to hold the richer southern colonies. Thus the southern strategy which ultimately lead to the British downfall. They had to do that becuase of Washington.


I think historians in a post-modern higher education system downplay the greatness of Washington.

This post was edited on 10/14/25 at 3:33 pm
Posted by UnitedFruitCompany
Bay Area
Member since Nov 2018
3777 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

think historians in a post-modern higher education system downplay the greatness of Washington.


Not to mention they always gloss over the fact he gave up total power 3 fricking times when, to that point historically, had only been done a whopping 2 times at best and both were Romans.

For those scoring at home, he gave up his commission after the Revolution, turned down being king of USA in the early aftermath, and then left the presidency after two terms because he thought that was enough time for any one man to serve in that capacity.


“I did not sacrifice my life and the lives of my men to depose George III in order to become George I.”

The greatest American and arguably one of the greatest men in the history of civilization.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram