- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Question for football coaches around run schemes?
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:34 am
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:34 am
What type of running attack requires the least amount of reads by the offensive line and running backs? In other words, how do you simply the approach to the point that these players don’t have to read and react as much?
Does this even exist?
As a former basketball player, I know that straight man to man defense is an easier ask of a limited experience team. Zone requires more reps and discipline.
Thanks in advance!
Does this even exist?
As a former basketball player, I know that straight man to man defense is an easier ask of a limited experience team. Zone requires more reps and discipline.
Thanks in advance!
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:37 am to champj3
Gap scheme.
Rules: gap, down, backer.
Rules: gap, down, backer.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:38 am to champj3
I don't know if its even about reads.
Cole Cublic was on Pate's show and he was talking about LSU's offense and he said mostly what we say. Traditional running plays are needed and that stuff.
But one thing he said stuck out to me . He said LSU needs to run more formations. He said its generally shotgun with RB offset to the right. He said they got away from that formation 7 times vs Ole Miss and that was the most we've done that this season.
Cole Cublic was on Pate's show and he was talking about LSU's offense and he said mostly what we say. Traditional running plays are needed and that stuff.
But one thing he said stuck out to me . He said LSU needs to run more formations. He said its generally shotgun with RB offset to the right. He said they got away from that formation 7 times vs Ole Miss and that was the most we've done that this season.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:39 am to champj3
It's a good question for sure but the truth is, there's a degree of reading by someone on just about every type of run play whether it's gap or zone.
Take Duo for example, which is a gap scheme run, the tailback is typically reading the playside linebacker. Depending on which zone scheme you call, the read for the back may change but he will be reading someone.
Gap can be a bit more simple for the offensive line but any pulls or traps require the O lineman to track his defender so he takes a good angle, which is in effect a read of sorts. For the most part though, gap helps when the defensive front is doing a lot of twisting and stunting. More often than not, gap is looking for a wall and a kick/lead. Most of the line is going to block away from the designed hole on plays like counter for example, and the kick out guy pulls back to the playside. That "wall" that the offensive line creates tends to create what people call "the wash" and the wash, just like a wave, picks up everything in front of it, including stunts and movement. In that sense, gap scheme is simpler.
Take Duo for example, which is a gap scheme run, the tailback is typically reading the playside linebacker. Depending on which zone scheme you call, the read for the back may change but he will be reading someone.
Gap can be a bit more simple for the offensive line but any pulls or traps require the O lineman to track his defender so he takes a good angle, which is in effect a read of sorts. For the most part though, gap helps when the defensive front is doing a lot of twisting and stunting. More often than not, gap is looking for a wall and a kick/lead. Most of the line is going to block away from the designed hole on plays like counter for example, and the kick out guy pulls back to the playside. That "wall" that the offensive line creates tends to create what people call "the wash" and the wash, just like a wave, picks up everything in front of it, including stunts and movement. In that sense, gap scheme is simpler.
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 9:47 am
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:45 am to bayou85
quote:
I don't know if its even about reads.
Cole Cublic was on Pate's show and he was talking about LSU's offense and he said mostly what we say. Traditional running plays are needed and that stuff.
But one thing he said stuck out to me . He said LSU needs to run more formations. He said its generally shotgun with RB offset to the right. He said they got away from that formation 7 times vs Ole Miss and that was the most we've done that this season.
I love that Cole made that point and he's 100% correct. I saw Cam Newton doing a video about motion in the NFL and he explained to the audience that motions are not "just because" in the higher levels of football. They're designed to expose what the defense is doing and to also create leverage for an offense. Formations work in a similar way. You can run the same 4-6 plays but motion and formation them in a million different ways. Defenses see these formations on film and they have to spend a ton of prep time 1) identifying all of the different formations & 2) figuring out how they want to line up to it. This creates a ton of stress defensively because all it takes is to misalign one time to one of a billion formations that you see and you're out leveraged defensively. It's all a numbers game and it forces defenders to communicate and to think more.
I can come out in trips and run counter with the back going left and an rpo bubble to the inside receiver right or I can come out in Spread and orbit the receiver on the left to the right of the formation and basically run the same concept. I can also come out in twins with a te to the right and run that same concept with an rpo to the te in the flat instead of throwing to the inside receiver in trips. It's all the same really, but it looks different to a defense and they have to line up differently to it.
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 9:55 am
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:49 am to champj3
Defenses are so geared to stopping the spread now that if someone lined up in the power I with a real fullback, they would get walked over.
Old-school hat on a hat football
Old-school hat on a hat football
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:50 am to JiminyCricket
quote:
You can run the same 4-6 plays but motion and formation them in a million different ways. Defenses see these formations on film and they have to spend a ton of prep time 1) identifying all of the different formations & 2) figuring out how they want to line up to it.
Wasn’t Mike Leach well known for primarily running 6 plays? He just ran them out of different formations and looks.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:50 am to JiminyCricket
Request for Chicken to create a “Scheme Board”. Where we just talk deep technical football.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:50 am to bayou85
quote:
But one thing he said stuck out to me . He said LSU needs to run more formations. He said its generally shotgun with RB offset to the right. He said they got away from that formation 7 times vs Ole Miss and that was the most we've done that this season.
That's a good point
Think back to 2019 when LSU would use a lot of different formations to create favorable matchups.
Under Sloan, it appears the approach is to use very few different formations (at least with the initial playcall) and allow Nussmeier to check into the right play at the line based upon what the defense is showing.
Analyst have talked about it, but Nussmeier and the offense do a LOT of pre-snap talking at the line. Moreso than a lot of other QBs/teams. Matt Flynn talked about it on he and Hester's radio show that it often looks like LSU/Nuss are trying to get into the "perfect play", which might be causing a lot of paralysis by analysis...which in turn causes guys to be unsure of what they are supposed to do.
Just run the damn play
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:51 am to JiminyCricket
Tom Brady once said it was him and Mcdaniel’s goal to run the same play that works repeatedly, but do it out of 10-15 different formations.
Additionally, I saw a video talking about a Kyle Shanahan offense where he ran a run play through the 6 hole with the same tailback and blocked it 8 different ways based on formation. Pretty nuts
Additionally, I saw a video talking about a Kyle Shanahan offense where he ran a run play through the 6 hole with the same tailback and blocked it 8 different ways based on formation. Pretty nuts
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:54 am to RB10
quote:
Wasn’t Mike Leach well known for primarily running 6 plays? He just ran them out of different formations and looks.
A route tree only has so many branches. The only things you can change is who is running which route and where they are starting it from.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:55 am to RB10
quote:
Wasn’t Mike Leach well known for primarily running 6 plays? He just ran them out of different formations and looks.
Yep, ran his whole offense from an index card.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:55 am to fastlane
quote:
Request for Chicken to create a “Scheme Board”. Where we just talk deep technical football.
That would be fun!
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:58 am to Alt26
Yeah, I watched Cubelic and also Flynn's take on scheme and playcalling. It's really an indictment on Sloan. I thought Atkins was supposed to come in and help with the run game as the designated RGC and TE coach. On top of that Sharp and Green are doing horribly with run blocking. Then there's Brad Davis and the OL.
I'm convinced this offensive staff is failing the players more than players just not doing their job.
I'm convinced this offensive staff is failing the players more than players just not doing their job.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:00 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Tom Brady once said it was him and Mcdaniel’s goal to run the same play that works repeatedly, but do it out of 10-15 different formations.
Additionally, I saw a video talking about a Kyle Shanahan offense where he ran a run play through the 6 hole with the same tailback and blocked it 8 different ways based on formation. Pretty nuts
Also why tempo can be so tough. There were times we would call the same 2 alternating plays while in what we would call nascar but changed the formation every play. It was a nightmare for defenses to line up to it. They had to stay super vanilla to just be as balanced as possible and it made the reads really clear. It basically took all the creativity away from the DC.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:01 am to JiminyCricket
quote:
Yep, ran his whole offense from an index card.
The theory being 6 extremely well executed plays is better than 20+ moderately executed plays.
I believe his receivers could execute every route out of each position making it easier for them to go fast as well.
He really was ahead of his time.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:04 am to Alt26
quote:
Analyst have talked about it, but Nussmeier and the offense do a LOT of pre-snap talking at the line. Moreso than a lot of other QBs/teams. Matt Flynn talked about it on he and Hester's radio show that it often looks like LSU/Nuss are trying to get into the "perfect play", which might be causing a lot of paralysis by analysis...which in turn causes guys to be unsure of what they are supposed to do.
Which also tips the play. If you check into a certain play every time; the defense knows what's coming. Like motioning the wideout into the backfield and handing it off every time.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:21 am to Alt26
quote:
Analyst have talked about it, but Nussmeier and the offense do a LOT of pre-snap talking at the line. Moreso than a lot of other QBs/teams. Matt Flynn talked about it on he and Hester's radio show that it often looks like LSU/Nuss are trying to get into the "perfect play", which might be causing a lot of paralysis by analysis...which in turn causes guys to be unsure of what they are supposed to do.
Just run the damn play
Both my kids play multiple sports, but were relatively a little late to playing them. (They go to a small school where they start/started on the JV as 7th graders). And they both “struggled” early on defense with not knowing what to do (basketball and football mainly). I kept preaching to them “it’s better to do the ‘wrong’ thing at 100% than the ‘right’ thing at anything less.”
If you don’t know who your man is, just pick somebody and guard them 100%. If you don’t know who to hit, just hit somebody as hard as you fricking can. You’ll probably get away with it and nobody will know. If you half arse it because you don’t know EXACTLY what to do, you will almost always get exposed, and you might as well not even be out there, you’re just getting in the way.
I think that is applicable to what you’re talking about here. Running the fricking “wrong” play with 100% conviction is better than running the “right” one at anything less. That goes for Nuss and all his checking, but also to Sloan. Pick a play and call it with conviction, don’t fumble around trying to find the “perfect” play, and it winds up getting sent down late and Nuss has no confidence in it.
It trickles down from Sloan to Nuss to the rest of the offense. Like you said, just pick a play and run the damn thing.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:38 am to BayouCowboy
quote:
Yeah, I watched Cubelic and also Flynn's take on scheme and playcalling. It's really an indictment on Sloan. I thought Atkins was supposed to come in and help with the run game as the designated RGC and TE coach. On top of that Sharp and Green are doing horribly with run blocking. Then there's Brad Davis and the OL.
I'm convinced this offensive staff is failing the players more than players just not doing their job.
Figure out what your guys do well and put them in position to do that. If the offense as a whole struggles to get on the same page with Nuss, then stop having so many checks at the line. If the OL doesn't zone block well...then stop asking them to zone block. If you're TEs don't block well...then don't run a lot of play necessitating the TEs to be great blockers.
And for Godsakes! If your QB and WRs are very good at attacking the middle of the field...THEN ATTACK THE MIDDLE OF THE FIELD!
Good coaches figure out what their guys do well and adjust their approach to fit the strength of the personnel. Bad coaches force players to try to do things they are incapable or weak at doing.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:44 am to fastlane
RUN YOUR PATH......GAP scheme and double-scrape to 2ed level....
Popular
Back to top

8






