Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

The Restaurant Rent Crisis: How Landlords Can Make More Money With Empty Buildings

Posted on 10/10/25 at 7:53 am
Posted by Stadium Rat
Metairie
Member since Jul 2004
10074 posts
Posted on 10/10/25 at 7:53 am


Could this be happening here? There sure are a lot of restaurants closing lately.

"When you walk past another empty storefront with a “For Lease” sign that never changes, you see the new math of American capitalism. Some restaurants are dying slow deaths from rent they can’t afford. Landlords learned something new and ugly. Property owners know that empty buildings pay better than full ones.

This isn’t about landlords doing something evil. This is about a system where banks, tax codes, and speculation turned vacant restaurant spaces into profit centers. The math is brutal and simple. For many landlords, keeping your favorite restaurant out means keeping more money in.

The Tax Game Nobody Talks About

Cook County in Illinois gave landlords property tax reductions for vacant commercial spaces¹. You read that right. Keep your building empty and pay less in taxes. The county assessor lowers your property value, and that cuts your tax bill.

The Cook County Assessor’s Office policy states that “commercial property appeals for vacancy can be granted because of a casualty or after the owner has made a good faith effort to lease the property but hasn’t been successful²”. For residential properties, vacancy relief only applies to casualty situations like fires or floods. Commercial properties get relief just by showing they tried to lease the space.

Put a “For Lease” sign in the window. Show some effort. Get the tax break.

“Vacancy reduces the assessed value of a property, which generally reduces the property’s taxes,” states the Cook County Assessor’s official policy³. The policy notes concern about “some properties being granted an excessive percentage of vacancy and gaining property tax relief” while “other property owners could be paying more of the property tax burden than they should be³”.

LINK

You don't have to give your email to read the full article.
Posted by PistolPete45
Mandeville, LA
Member since Apr 2012
627 posts
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:00 am to
Didn't read the article, but how does a tax break make more sense than renting it out? surely the tax break doesn't come close to market commercial rent?
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
128855 posts
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:06 am to
Yeah this makes no sense
Posted by lsujro
north of the wall
Member since Jul 2007
4084 posts
Posted on 10/10/25 at 9:37 am to
Tenant generally responsible for the taxes. Not sure why it would make sense to keep it vacant - still losing $. Also makes it harder to use it as collateral if not rented.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
119465 posts
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:10 am to
Sounds like some 25 year old Reddit nerd with no understanding of the market wrote this.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
73892 posts
Posted on 10/10/25 at 12:03 pm to
The building that Brennan’s leased on Canal St carried a $45k month rent. Think about it
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
15555 posts
Posted on 10/10/25 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

The building that Brennan’s leased on Canal St carried a $45k month rent. Think about it

I’ll think out loud. Show me my blind spots.

If I’m the property owner and typically receive $45k in revenue from rent, and that rent includes the taxes due from that leased space, why would I be content not earning the rent? Would my tax savings be greater than $45k? If yes, why would tax assessors reward vacancy rather than incentivize occupancy?
Posted by Dead Mike
Cell Block 4
Member since Mar 2010
3928 posts
Posted on 10/10/25 at 2:32 pm to
Why would you own property if the property taxes exceeded the rental income? Just for appreciation in market value?
Posted by Ryan3232
Valet driver for TD staff
Member since Dec 2008
27300 posts
Posted on 10/10/25 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

This isn’t about landlords doing something evil. This is about a system where banks, tax codes, and speculation turned vacant restaurant spaces into profit centers. The math is brutal and simple. For many landlords, keeping your favorite restaurant out means keeping more money in.

The Tax Game Nobody Talks About

Cook County in Illinois gave landlords property tax reductions for vacant commercial spaces¹. You read that right. Keep your building empty and pay less in taxes. The county assessor lowers your property value, and that cuts your tax bill.

This makes no sense


Example below with random numbers:

With Tenants:
Lease Revenue = $5,000 a month
Taxes = $2,000 a month
Net = $3,000 a month


Without Tenants:
Lease Revenue = $0
Taxes = $1,000 a month
Net = negative $1,000 a month

But hey, let's cheat the system with option 2 because the taxes are lower.

I don't own rental property and I know there is more to my example, but is there something I'm missing here?
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 2:46 pm
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
23301 posts
Posted on 10/10/25 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

But hey, let's cheat the system with option 2 because the taxes are lower.

I don't own rental property and I know there is more to my example, but is there something I'm missing here?


I can only figure it makes sense if its part of a much larger portfolio and they are making enough money they can carry these losses over with a longer term play in mind. Such as waiting for the building to appreciate and sell later or something.

Otherwise, yes this is dumb on all accounts. Its ridiculous for the government to get involved to incentivize vacancy. They shouldn't be involved at all but at least incentivize keeping them occupied.
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
19082 posts
Posted on 10/10/25 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Between tax reductions for vacant properties, speculation on future high-paying tenants, and the ability to claim business losses, keeping buildings empty often pays better than renting them to restaurants at affordable rates.


How much loss are they claiming? Are they basing it off the maximum rent ever achieved, then showing a huge loss?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram