- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Shooters location compared to the entry wound
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:28 am
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:28 am
watching the gruesome video, blood comes gushing out of the left side of his neck. also it seems the entry wound was coming from right to left also.
if this is in fact where Tyler was... please educate me on what I saw in the video? seems like the shooter had to be way more to Charlie's right?
this is not some conspiracy question. it's just what my brain says when I look at this picture.
ETA. I got my answer at the bottom of page 1. y'all can stop downvoting.
if this is in fact where Tyler was... please educate me on what I saw in the video? seems like the shooter had to be way more to Charlie's right?
this is not some conspiracy question. it's just what my brain says when I look at this picture.
ETA. I got my answer at the bottom of page 1. y'all can stop downvoting.
This post was edited on 9/15/25 at 10:26 am
16
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:29 am to Mouth
This is why the chest plate and ricochet bullet theory makes sense.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:31 am to GumboPot
I agree with the ricochet theory. but this board posted a lot of pictures that makes it look he was not wearing one. I initially thought he was wearing armor, though.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:32 am to GumboPot
quote:
This is why the chest plate and ricochet bullet theory makes sense.
Yup. The only one that does.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:33 am to GumboPot
quote:
chest plate
Not this shite again.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:33 am to Mouth
quote:
I agree with the ricochet theory. but this board posted a lot of pictures that makes it look he was not wearing one. I initially thought he was wearing armor, though.
He was wearing a cross underneath his shirt, it is visible earlier in the day.
Maybe the bullet clipped his cross? He was definitely not wearing body armor.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:33 am to Mouth
quote:
this is not some conspiracy question.
We’ve entered the retarded phase of a tragedy.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:34 am to Mouth
No, it appears to be correct. My only thought was of an exit wound. Without, tells me the bone in that area was also impacted. We may not ever know the bullet grain used.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:34 am to Mouth
quote:
I agree with the ricochet theory. but this board posted a lot of pictures that makes it look he was not wearing one. I initially thought he was wearing armor, though.
Right. I'm not married to the theory.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:36 am to Mouth
That soft tissue and an 06 bullet unless you have access to the body to do a post mortem on I wouldn’t try to draw any conclusions.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:37 am to Timeoday
quote:
Without, tells me the bone in that area was also impacted.
Makes sense.
quote:
We may not ever know the bullet grain used.
Could have been on the lower end. 110 instead of 200.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:39 am to the808bass
quote:
We’ve entered the retarded phase of a tragedy.
great explanation for my question.
looking at the pictures it appears that he is not wearing armor. so why does this roof location seem wrong?
This post was edited on 9/15/25 at 9:40 am
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:40 am to GumboPot
quote:
Right. I'm not married to the theory.
Sallyshuman made a good point about maybe it deflected from Charlie's cross.
The only thing I am married to was that he wasn't shot directly in the neck OR the shot didn't come from the spot identified so far.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:41 am to the808bass
Back….and to the left
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:44 am to the808bass
quote:
We’ve entered the retarded phase of a tragedy.
People just want to know what really happened. If what someone sees doesn't jive with the official narrative, of course they would look for more evidence.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:45 am to Mouth
Where was the gun when he left? How did it end up in the nearby “woods?”
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:48 am to Mouth
Here is a direct line of site view.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:48 am to Mouth
well he was on the edge of the building not exactly where it says possible location of shooter.
So that red arrow trajectory wouldn't even be right.
You are coming up with conspiracies because of some general area photo.
Ahh, jrods got me.
So that red arrow trajectory wouldn't even be right.
You are coming up with conspiracies because of some general area photo.
Ahh, jrods got me.
This post was edited on 9/15/25 at 9:49 am
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:48 am to the808bass
quote:
We’ve entered the retarded phase of a tragedy.
Bass despite our differences, I respect your intelligence. How can you reconcile the location of the wound with an undeflected shot from the reported shooter's location?
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:49 am to Mouth
I’m not following how the angle doesn’t make sense.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News