Started By
Message

If the Government stopped issuing marriage licenses

Posted on 9/6/25 at 9:47 pm
Posted by Boston Bob
Member since Sep 2025
70 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 9:47 pm
Would you be able to have a successful relationship & family ?

Or is that not possible without the government giving you a piece of paper ?
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
119861 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 9:48 pm to
It would save a lot of people a lot of money.
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
17724 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 9:52 pm to
It’s always these fricking new guys with shitty, obvious bait topics.

Take your shiny hook elsewhere.
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
37934 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 9:57 pm to
As long as they don’t take the right away from the gays that’s all that really matters…
Posted by Artificial Ignorance
Member since Feb 2025
1424 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:03 pm to
F paper.

Govt especially.

Got married. Forgot certificate of marriage for pastor to sign night of wedding.

Who cares!

Did perfunctory bs…

But who cares.
Posted by Boston Bob
Member since Sep 2025
70 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:06 pm to
quote:


It’s always these fricking new guys with shitty, obvious bait topics.

Take your shiny hook elsewhere.


It's an honest question for the marriage pushers.
Without that piece of paper from the government would people just wander aimlessly through the wilderness unable to reproduce, to be monogamous, to love & care for their children ?
How is it possible that there were families that thrived prior to there being governments handing out magical pieces of paper?
I mean, it's not real until your government overlords give you a piece of paper saying it's real, right ?


This post was edited on 9/6/25 at 10:24 pm
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
32620 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:07 pm to
It’s possible to do without the government but having some permanence to it gives it much more weight. Imagine how many more divorces there would be if you had no permanence to marriage
Posted by andwesway
Zachary, LA
Member since Jun 2016
2672 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:14 pm to
Absolutely. Already been doing it for 10 years. I don't need the government to validate my relationship.
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
23143 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:19 pm to
I have no idea where that piece of paper is and it was a foreign country who gave it to me. My marriage is great. What the frick is your point?
This post was edited on 9/6/25 at 10:20 pm
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
18629 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:19 pm to
The government one is just for taxes and health insurance from my employer.

The only one that technically matters is from a church. After all, that’s the basis of marriage from a historical perspective.
Posted by thenza
Member since Sep 2013
1374 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

It’s always these fricking new guys with shitty, obvious bait topics. Take your shiny hook elsewhere.


With a topic that’s sure to strike a chord on Tigerdroppings. I’m thinking it’s a bot.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
75973 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

t’s possible to do without the government but having some permanence to it gives it much more weight


The threat is losing wealth/money. Rarely if ever do you hear people going through a divorce lament about what Jesus will think of them.

Why rich people don't give a shite about getting a divorce. They don't want to lose wealth either, but they aren't working past retirement because she took the house.
Posted by tigerbacon
Arkansas
Member since Aug 2010
4439 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:38 pm to
Legally that piece of paper means a lot like power of attorney at hospitals, tax benefits, and being able to be on your spouse medical and dental plans
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
75973 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

Legally that piece of paper means a lot like power of attorney at hospitals, tax benefits, and being able to be on your spouse medical and dental plans


Most of those, minus the taxes, came as benefits long after governments got involved with marriage.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
71110 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 7:42 am to
The government taxing me less after I got married tells me the government would have been just fine taxing me less before I was married.

Same with insurance.
Posted by Big Jim Slade
Member since Oct 2016
6216 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 7:44 am to
Many states recognize common law marriage. No govt paper involved.
Posted by Dadren
Jawja
Member since Dec 2023
2986 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 7:46 am to
quote:

honest question

quote:

marriage pushers

Yeah you definitely sound like you want to have a discussion about this in good faith. Sure bro.
Posted by Dadren
Jawja
Member since Dec 2023
2986 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 8:00 am to
quote:

The government taxing me less after I got married tells me the government would have been just fine taxing me less before I was married.

Unless the government wants to encourage people to get married.

This is really the answer to the OP’s disingenuous question. Nobody gets married in a vacuum. Replace the word “government” with “society” and it’s easier to consider the benefits of having a legal framework for something as significant as marriage. I’m not saying it’s perfect (it’s clearly not) but believing that nothing about your marriage is a public matter is childlike thinking.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
12341 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 8:12 am to
The government didn't always play this role...churches issued and it was simply registered with the state for record keeping.

quote:

The transition to state-issued licenses

Beginning in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, state and local governments increased their control over the marriage process.

Growth of government control: The states began to require a pre-approved marriage license before a wedding could take place. This gave the government authority to regulate who could marry, and in some states, was used to enforce anti-miscegenation laws and compile census data.

Uniformity by 1929: The push for state-issued licenses was so widespread that by 1929, every state had laws on marriage licenses.


So.. to answer your question, of course people could- and DID- have successful relationships and families without the government issuing a piece of paper.

Google, my friend... works wonders.
Posted by tigerbacon
Arkansas
Member since Aug 2010
4439 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 8:33 am to
He said issue with not getting married and I post3d them
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram