- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Mid Barataria Diversion
Posted on 8/15/25 at 8:33 pm
Posted on 8/15/25 at 8:33 pm
LINK
I know many people on board were for it but these arguments for cancelling aren’t unreasonable use the money for multiple smaller projects. Maybe I am blinded by JBE grafting from the project but I think right decision was to cancel it even if Landry and Billy N are not to be trusted either
I know many people on board were for it but these arguments for cancelling aren’t unreasonable use the money for multiple smaller projects. Maybe I am blinded by JBE grafting from the project but I think right decision was to cancel it even if Landry and Billy N are not to be trusted either
Posted on 8/15/25 at 8:37 pm to Optimism
There have been multiple long threads on this that are still going or can be searched.
It was an insanely stupid, typical LA politics BS move. Landry will end up being just as bad of a governor as JBE.
It was an insanely stupid, typical LA politics BS move. Landry will end up being just as bad of a governor as JBE.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 9:13 pm to Optimism
Why start a thread, then go offline? You must work for Landry or the fat frick lt. Guv.
Or you’re in line for one of the “multiple smaller projects”. With which the trouble is, tremendous amounts of money are spent with negligible impact. Other than enriching those who get them. As a state, we’ve fricked around for years with multiple smaller projects. And yet here we are.
Or you’re in line for one of the “multiple smaller projects”. With which the trouble is, tremendous amounts of money are spent with negligible impact. Other than enriching those who get them. As a state, we’ve fricked around for years with multiple smaller projects. And yet here we are.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 9:20 pm to Optimism
quote:
Optimism
The name does fit.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 9:25 pm to LegendInMyMind
Don’t like Landry like Nungesser less but hate JBE more than those two. I admit my judgment on issue is clouded because I think JBE was getting kickbacks from the diversion. Wish we had a conservative businessman as governor but dont see one on deck
Posted on 8/15/25 at 9:32 pm to Optimism
Looking at your post history you are just a shill against this project.
Oyster or Shrimp fishermen in your family?
Oyster or Shrimp fishermen in your family?
Posted on 8/15/25 at 9:42 pm to Optimism
why would you believe anything this admin says? This was purely political.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 9:44 pm to fightin tigers
Nope and I admit I may be wrong but JBE association just makes me suspect. I know the board hates Landry for justifiable reasons but I feel like people forget how bad JBE was and think Landry is worse which objectively isn’t true JBE did nothing on crime was a leftist on many social issues signed no tort reform cut no business taxes etc. Landry is the GOP version of EWE everything he does is political but JBE pretended to be Mr Honor Code and we know that wasnt true and his policies were terrible for the state. So forgive me if I think maybe he could be wrong on the Mid Barataria Diversion as well It will be interesting to see if a conservative business candidate will challenge Landry in 2 years
Posted on 8/15/25 at 9:44 pm to Optimism
What is all this JBE hate about?
Posted on 8/15/25 at 9:47 pm to fightin tigers
quote:The project was suppose to cost how many billions to save approximately 20 square miles of coast line right?
Looking at your post history you are just a shill against this project.
For how long?
I'm honestly asking because when I saw the initial numbers snd the small amount it was "going to save" my immediate gut reaction was this is going to be a bullshite drain on the tax payers that isn't going to work and we'd be much better off investing it into our state directly through either a school choice program or a direct infusion of tax grants for a fortified roofing program to lower interest rates or an investment in more law enforcement to crack down on crime and lower car insurance rates
I'm an idiot though
Posted on 8/15/25 at 9:55 pm to Solo Cam
quote:
The project was suppose to cost how many billions to save approximately 20 square miles of coast line right?
20 square miles is huge.
None of the Landry parrotheads want to compare and estimate the "smaller project" approach. They dont even have estimates.
We will spend more taxpayer dollars canceling the project than we would have spent building the project. Fact.
Posted on 8/15/25 at 9:57 pm to Optimism
quote:
I admit I may be wrong but JBE associatio
You mean because you have zero evidence to support your position you may be wrong? Yeah, I agree.
Is there a single costal restoration expert that agrees with canceling this project? Not that smaller projects won't work, but does any expert agree canceling this project is the right move?
Posted on 8/15/25 at 10:56 pm to Optimism
quote:
Nope and I admit I may be wrong but JBE association just makes me suspect
Ok dipshit, so you’re buying the “we need to save the endangered barataria porpoise” line instead ?
Posted on 8/15/25 at 11:27 pm to REG861
No but I am buying that there are serious underestimated cost overruns in the future and JBE ifs corrupt and I don’t trust him
Posted on 8/15/25 at 11:48 pm to Optimism
Spend $3 billion for something that Mother Nature will destroy or ruin? Just light the money on fire.
Posted on 8/16/25 at 12:15 am to Optimism
I too hate JBE
But this project was supported by many smart experts all over the world.
I trust them more than I trust LA politicians
Also, since Landry doesn’t control the money, no promise it can be used for other projects
But this project was supported by many smart experts all over the world.
I trust them more than I trust LA politicians
Also, since Landry doesn’t control the money, no promise it can be used for other projects
Posted on 8/16/25 at 5:16 am to fightin tigers
quote:How could you possibly say that when the initial budget was 1.5 billion and increased to 2.92 billion?
We will spend more taxpayer dollars canceling the project than we would have spent building the project. Fact.
You say they don't have estimates for smaller projects but this one has literally doubled.
Honestly I don't know, I just hate when we give her government billions of dollars for damn near anything and they ruin it, if it should be voted on then I wish a private contractor would do it.
Posted on 8/16/25 at 5:56 am to Optimism
quote:
multiple smaller projects.
If they accomplish the same goal, why not go with the one that does it the fastest?
Posted on 8/16/25 at 6:58 am to Optimism
The fact that you think this is Louisiana's money to use elsewhere shows how ignorant you are. Louisiana taxpayers are going to be on the hook for tens if not hundreds of millions for the cancellation and the trust can give that money to Alabama or Mississippi instead. As others have pointed out, you are just a shill trying to act impartial.
Posted on 8/16/25 at 8:08 am to Optimism
quote:
use the money for multiple smaller projects
Follow the money … just wait to see which firms start to “study” these smaller projects. That should answer everyone’s questions; if family members or unusually high campaign contributions are involved that’s all you need to know
Popular
Back to top

12






