- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
JD Vance Says CIA and Media are Complicit in Rigging Elections
Posted on 8/11/25 at 8:06 am
Posted on 8/11/25 at 8:06 am
Posted on 8/11/25 at 8:11 am to stout
quote:
media rigs our elections for Democrats
These are propaganda machines, no different than North Korea.
‘Unprecedented’ positive media for Harris, 89% negative for Trump
The media have gone on a Kamala Harris binge since the vice president moved swiftly to replace President Joe Biden as the Democratic Party’s 2024 candidate of choice, giving her the most positive coverage in modern history.
At the same time, and nearly as expected, the same media have gone on a scorched-earth campaign against former President Donald Trump, giving the Republican nominee what is likely to be a historic level of negative coverage.
“Not only has Harris received 66% more airtime than former President Donald Trump, but the spin of Harris’s coverage has been more positive (84%) than any other major party nominee, even as Trump’s coverage has been nearly entirely hostile (89% negative),” according to the new report shared with Secrets.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 8:13 am to stout
Mockingbird is alive and well.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 8:22 am to stout
This issue is CIA silos (and other intelligence agency silos).
Silos have protective walls. One silo has no idea what the other silo is doing.
The point is, the CIA could have 90% of the people doing good American work. But there are CIA silos working here in the US to undermine elections. There's CIA silos abroad working against the presidents foreign policy interest.
The Director of the CIA should have a handle on all these silos but apparently he is forced to look the other way.
After 911 the Director of National Intelligence was created to amalgamate all the intelligence silos from the 17 intelligence agencies. Force them to share information. Laws were put in place to make intelligence agencies share information with the DNI.
Since 911 all the DNIs either didn't do much or weaponized the information (Clapper) against Trump. Now that Tulsi in in the position of DNI she is actually amalgamating the information from the intelligence agencies for the Commander in Chief as it was intended and the intelligence agencies are having a conniption fit.
In fact, Tulsi is doing such a good job as DNI, Tom Cotton is trying to pass laws to claw back DNI power.
Silos have protective walls. One silo has no idea what the other silo is doing.
The point is, the CIA could have 90% of the people doing good American work. But there are CIA silos working here in the US to undermine elections. There's CIA silos abroad working against the presidents foreign policy interest.
The Director of the CIA should have a handle on all these silos but apparently he is forced to look the other way.
After 911 the Director of National Intelligence was created to amalgamate all the intelligence silos from the 17 intelligence agencies. Force them to share information. Laws were put in place to make intelligence agencies share information with the DNI.
Since 911 all the DNIs either didn't do much or weaponized the information (Clapper) against Trump. Now that Tulsi in in the position of DNI she is actually amalgamating the information from the intelligence agencies for the Commander in Chief as it was intended and the intelligence agencies are having a conniption fit.
In fact, Tulsi is doing such a good job as DNI, Tom Cotton is trying to pass laws to claw back DNI power.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 8:28 am to Barneyrb
I have an idea, end the rouge cia assets
seems pretty easy if your the boss
but this might be more like a bond villain type organization than a cia type government agency he is talking about
This post was edited on 8/11/25 at 8:35 am
Posted on 8/11/25 at 8:28 am to stout
In a perfect world for me, and America, the media* and the Dems will be wishing in 2029-2030 that they could return to the days of Trump instead of having to deal with J.D. Vance.
Vance just might be the best insurance policy that President Trump has. The people who hate Trump also don't want any part of J.D. I pray that they can keep both men safe.
* I'm actually hoping that we will have a "cleaner" media 4 years from now. Maybe some new ownership, too. We are seeing a few changes for the better, but we have a long way to go.
PS - Somewhere JFK is wanting to tell J.D. to be careful butting heads with the likes of the CIA.
Vance just might be the best insurance policy that President Trump has. The people who hate Trump also don't want any part of J.D. I pray that they can keep both men safe.
* I'm actually hoping that we will have a "cleaner" media 4 years from now. Maybe some new ownership, too. We are seeing a few changes for the better, but we have a long way to go.
PS - Somewhere JFK is wanting to tell J.D. to be careful butting heads with the likes of the CIA.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 8:32 am to GumboPot
quote:such a RINO.
Tom Cotton is
Posted on 8/11/25 at 8:41 am to stout
Has to go deeper than just giving talking points to the media. The CIA has ultimate control of the media.
All it takes is one network to report the truths, or an opposing viewpoint with common sense questions that the other controlled networks are not reporting, and their game is cooked. Somehow, they, the CIA or someone gained control of all the networks. That sounds impossible but when you see debanking, it's audits, prosecutions, etc. it's seems very plausible the deep state actors could leverage board members and executive to do things how they want them done or else face consequences.
All it takes is one network to report the truths, or an opposing viewpoint with common sense questions that the other controlled networks are not reporting, and their game is cooked. Somehow, they, the CIA or someone gained control of all the networks. That sounds impossible but when you see debanking, it's audits, prosecutions, etc. it's seems very plausible the deep state actors could leverage board members and executive to do things how they want them done or else face consequences.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 8:41 am to stout
When I was in high school 25 years ago I interned at a television station. One of my jobs was in monitoring what other stations in town were airing, which was as exciting as it sounds. Anyway, I found it crazy that literally every day the first 2/3 of the national nightly news broadcasts were exactly the same thing. Same stories. Same talking points. Same commercials.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 8:47 am to stout
If youve been paying attention for the past few decades, you would already know this
Posted on 8/11/25 at 8:55 am to RAB
quote:
every day the first 2/3 of the national nightly news broadcasts were exactly the same thing. Same stories. Same talking points. Same commercials
That’s brainwashing 101
And it’s very effective on masses of people.
The data doesn’t lie.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:04 am to stout
Been any number of examples in recent years where all these talking heads from national right on down through local stations are parroting the same exact talking point almost word for word.
It’s not really that crazy anymore for anyone who has been paying attention to American Pravda.
It’s not really that crazy anymore for anyone who has been paying attention to American Pravda.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 10:26 am to stout
It's a shame Republicans aren't in control of the executive and legislative branches so they could rein the CIA in a little bit.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 11:56 am to Great Plains Drifter
Makes perfect sense. If you could affect the security of your employment you would.
Dems increase government waste. The waste that works for the government will do what they can to ensure they stay around
Dems increase government waste. The waste that works for the government will do what they can to ensure they stay around
Popular
Back to top

10











