Started By
Message

Trump wants the new fbi hq to be in DC, Dems are having a fit about it being in Md

Posted on 7/10/25 at 10:08 pm
Posted by Padme
Member since Dec 2020
9289 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 10:08 pm
Must be some payback to Van Hollen

Not sure I understand why it’s important to them that it be in Maryland







Politico


Funding bill in limbo amid FBI headquarters uproar
Senate appropriators are scrambling to figure out whether they can salvage the Commerce-Justice-Science bill.

Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) speaks with reporters as she boards an elevator at the U.S. Capitol July 8, 2025. (Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images)
"I think it’s better we withdraw the bill for now than watch this bill go down," Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins said Thursday. | Francis Chung/POLITICO

By DAVID LIM, CASSANDRA DUMAY and CALEN RAZOR
07/10/2025 02:24 PM EDT


Updated: 07/10/2025 02:55 PM EDT
Senators scrambled Thursday to avoid an impasse that is threatening to scuttle one of the 12 annual funding bills and cast a pall over the whole bipartisan appropriations process.
Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) put the panel into an unusual extended recess amid negotiations over resolving the dispute, which is rooted in President Donald Trump’s decision to override a congressionally approved plan to move FBI headquarters to suburban Maryland and instead keep the agency in downtown Washington.


00:11
Top Stories from POLITICO
Skip Ad


Sen. Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat, introduced an amendment to the fiscal 2026 Commerce-Justice-Science funding bill barring the Trump administration from using headquarters funding for anything other than the original plan. It was adopted after GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska crossed party lines to support it.
The prospect that the bill might countermand a Trump administration priority subsequently caused several GOP senators to withdraw their support for the underlying bill. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), who chairs the subcommittee overseeing the bill, said it was “none of our committee’s business” where the FBI headquarters goes: “We don’t get to choose sites, and it’s certainly not the committee’s jurisdiction of Commerce, Justice and Science.”
Attempts at pursuing compromise language on the FBI headquarters matter failed, prompting Collins to call what she said would be a “very long recess.” The panel is not expected to reconvene before next week.
“I think it’s better we withdraw the bill for now than watch this bill go down,” she said.
The blowup exasperated some Democrats on the panel, who questioned why the Republican majority could not accept Van Hollen’s provision. “Because there was a bipartisan amendment adopted we’re going to tank this bill?” asked Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz.
Others expressed confidence the issue would ultimately get settled.
“I honestly think we’ll be able to resolve it,” said Washington Sen. Patty Murray, the panel’s top Democrat. “We’ve always been able to work out issues.”
This post was edited on 7/10/25 at 10:09 pm
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
46146 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 10:14 pm to
I wish they'd put it somewhere other than either D.C. or Maryland.
Posted by Padme
Member since Dec 2020
9289 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 10:16 pm to
Agreed, how about Alabama, or if Louisiana gets rid of Cassidy, maybe La
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
26227 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 10:19 pm to
Not Alabama. We don't want those assholes down here.

Why do they even need a new building?
This post was edited on 7/10/25 at 10:20 pm
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93282 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 10:23 pm to
Didnt kash me outside say he would move it to Kansas
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
16542 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 10:25 pm to
Why can't they renovate the current building?
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20318 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

Agreed, how about Alabama, or if Louisiana gets rid of Cassidy, maybe La

You can have that den of villains near you in Louisiana but I sure as hell don’t want them near me or AL.

Until that place gets sorted out they can stay in the swamp.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35068 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 10:29 pm to
Why can’t they renovate any and all buildings? Why would they ever build a new building to house an entity that had an already existing building?

I’d say usually because, generally speaking, the entity simply outgrew the previous building and upgrading in all aspects made the most sense. I for one can certainly understand the need - I believe the current building was built in the 60s and has just immeasurably outgrown the current digs.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35696 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 10:31 pm to
I honestly cannot imagine caring either way.

All possible options are within like 100 square miles.

No one of any importance should waste time on this.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35696 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

Why can't they renovate the current building?

Because it’s old and they can’t guarantee it isn’t riddled with foreign intelligence bugs.

They want a new facility.
Posted by wryder1
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2008
4755 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 10:42 pm to
Put it in Dearborne Michigan or where all those Somalians are at in Minnesota. Those are probably future hotspots for terrorism here. It’ll save on travel expenses.
Posted by JackieTreehorn
Member since Sep 2013
34886 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 10:59 pm to
Not only would I tell them to make do with their current building, but I’d slash their budget.
Posted by AlextheBodacious
Member since Oct 2020
3676 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

Not sure I understand why it’s important to them that it be in Maryland

It’d not just that it was going to be in Maryland. It was going to be in PG County, Maryland. Should be obvious why Dems want it there so bad. DC is the best location for the HQ. If not DC, the Springfield option is next best, it’s an easier trip onto the city from there and it’s much closer to Quantico.

Maryland also was recently fricked on an air guard F16 unit that was supposed to transfer from DC to Maryland as part of the deal for the redskins moving back to DC. Losing the new FBI HQ, the Redskins, and F16s is a rough year for Maryland politicians.

Maryland really wanted the F16s because their only fighters were A-10s that have recently been decommissioned so they now don’t have any fighters. The transfer was the last piece of the deal to get Maryland on board the redskins moving back to DC
Posted by BigoBoys
Arizona
Member since Aug 2019
721 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 11:11 pm to
The federal government needs to be de-centralized. They can have offices in D.C. where the bosses work at. But, were the work is done should be somewhere else. Will cost less and less vulnerable.
Posted by BigoBoys
Arizona
Member since Aug 2019
721 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 11:12 pm to
The federal government needs to be de-centralized. They can have offices in D.C. where the bosses work at. But, were the work is done should be somewhere else. Will cost less and less vulnerable.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35068 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 11:16 pm to
I guess the national and international child sex trafficking that so many amongst us are gnashing their teeth about will just have to go on unabated and unfettered. Because contrary to popular belief, as a general matter, the FBI does pretty good and absolutely necessary work to that end. Amongst many other activities and operations from which average Americans derive the benefits of safety, mostly when we don’t have any idea what, when or how. It’s a pretty large organization, it’s extremely irrational for anyone to think that they’re more bad than good.

Not pointing any fingers in any specific direction, just general observation.
Posted by AlextheBodacious
Member since Oct 2020
3676 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 11:19 pm to
quote:

have offices in D.C. where the bosses work at. But, were the work is done should be somewhere else. Will cost less and less vulnerable.

How is this saving money and why would you separate org leadership from the people they are leading?
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23120 posts
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Why do they even need a new building?


That's a willfully stupid question.

They have needed out of the Hoover building since at least the Bush II administration. Congress has spent two decades arguing over whose pockets will be lined by the move. There's no way Van Hollen got his move in the final version without spreading some of his contractor bribe money around.
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
27623 posts
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:48 am to
Trumps wants (insert anything).


Dems have fit over (insert anything)
Posted by Ten Bears
Florida
Member since Oct 2018
4728 posts
Posted on 7/11/25 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Because it’s old and they can’t guarantee it isn’t riddled with foreign intelligence bugs.


Probably more infested with mold, asbestos, and lead than "bugs" and the cost to renovate is way more than new construction.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram