Started By
Message

401k 55 rule?

Posted on 7/10/25 at 2:34 pm
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
15607 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 2:34 pm
So you must be working when you turn 55 to withdraw penalty free?

What if you stop working at 50, live off other savings, investment accounts…go get a job at 49, transfer your 401k into their plan, and quit after turning 50?

I’m really regretting investing so much when I was younger in my 401k if I can’t touch it even tho there’s plenty in there to retire at 50. I swear it’s the goal of every financial advisor to ensure you continue working and supporting them.
Posted by Rize
Spring Texas
Member since Sep 2011
18573 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

So you must be working when you turn 55 to withdraw penalty free? What if you stop working at 50, live off other savings, investment accounts…go get a job at 49, transfer your 401k into their plan, and quit after turning 50? I’m really regretting investing so much when I was younger in my 401k if I can’t touch it even tho there’s plenty in there to retire at 50. I swear it’s the goal of every financial advisor to ensure you continue working and supporting them.


My dad retired for 90 days at 54 after taking a package from BP. Went back to work because most of his money was in a 401k and now he’s going to work his consulting job for another 2 years until he hits 65. He’s the one who mentioned to me I better open a Roth and have other investments outside of my 401k.
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
15607 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 2:45 pm to
I guess worst case scenario you can eat the 10% penalty if it won’t make a difference in your overall needs. Would really suck to do so.
Posted by UpstairsComputer
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2017
1792 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

I swear it’s the goal of every financial advisor to ensure you continue working and supporting them.


When you apologize publicly for your stupid comment I'll help.

Posted by jamiegla1
Member since Aug 2016
7878 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 3:03 pm to
I’m 99% sure you can only use the current 401k of the employer that you resign from. Can’t use rollovers.

Source - I had the same thought one time
Posted by Triple Bogey
19th Green
Member since May 2017
6486 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 3:19 pm to
Once both of my kids get out of daycare, I'm starting a Roth and putting all that same money in it. If I want to retire at 50 I can live off the Roth until 55 assuming my outstanding debts are all paid off by then.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
21269 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 3:23 pm to
first rule of rule of 55: Your employer's 401k plan MUST HAVE that option enabled on their plan! If the 401k plan does not have the option enabled, then you cannot use it.

second rule, you must be working for the employer when you turn 55. You can then retire from that employer after you turn 55 but you can only touch the money within that employer's 401k. You can't roll it over to another account and then access it until you hit regular retirement age.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
21269 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

I guess worst case scenario you can eat the 10% penalty if it won’t make a difference in your overall needs. Would really suck to do so.


It depends on the scenario. For myself, I'd be paying 24% marginal tax on anything that I put into a Roth. In my retirement I'll be at the marginal rate of 12% but the effective rate of 8-9%. A 10% penalty would still keep my tax rate lower than putting it into a Roth in a scenario like the OP.
This post was edited on 7/10/25 at 3:26 pm
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
15607 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

If I want to retire at 50 I can live off the Roth until 55 assuming my outstanding debts are all paid off by then.


That was sorta part of my question. If you retire at 50, you can no longer withdraw 401k funds at 55 without penalty.

Sounds like you must keep working actively until you turn 55.

Another question is if you switched jobs throughout career prior to 55 and rolled over your previous 401ks prior to 55, does that count? Or, even if it’s all in your current employer’s plan, can you only withdraw the funds from when you started with your current employer?
Posted by GCTigahs
Member since Oct 2014
2433 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

second rule, you must be working for the employer when you turn 55.


I thought is was "in the year you turn 55"?
Posted by Rize
Spring Texas
Member since Sep 2011
18573 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

Once both of my kids get out of daycare, I'm starting a Roth and putting all that same money in it. If I want to retire at 50 I can live off the Roth until 55 assuming my outstanding debts are all paid off by then.


Man starting young is key to a Roth. I wish I would have started in my 20’s instead of my mid to late 30’s. $6500 then $7000 a year takes a while to build up any real money. I’ll jump to the catchup when I hit 50 but I think it only raises it by $1000.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
21269 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Another question is if you switched jobs throughout career prior to 55 and rolled over your previous 401ks prior to 55, does that count?


Yes, for example, if you take a new job at 54 and you rollover your previous 401k into the new 401k and then retire at 55, I believe you can access all that money in the 401k when you retire.
Posted by gpburdell
ATL
Member since Jun 2015
1577 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 4:06 pm to
quote:


first rule of rule of 55: Your employer's 401k plan MUST HAVE that option enabled on their plan! If the 401k plan does not have the option enabled, then you cannot use it.


From what I've read, the rule of 55 is an IRS provision that applies to all 401k plans.

What is specific to each 401k plan is if it allows partial distributions. Some plans don't allow partial distributions and would require you to withdrawal the entire balance. In that case, the rule of 55 wouldn't be useful for most people.
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2893 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 4:16 pm to
Look into Roth conversion ladder and 72(t) for other methods to access 401k or IRA early.

Retiring at 50-55 is a sweet spot for 72(t) since you're locked longer of 5yrs or until 59.5 anyway. Earlier than that and it's a long time to be stuck in an inflexible withdrawal schedule.

I've considered looking for a job w 401k that allows rule of 55 and going back to work for a bit around that age just to get another early access method.
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2893 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 4:24 pm to
Living off Roth contributions in early retirement isn't usually ideal.
1. they get depleted quickly (growth can't even tapped early without tax & penalty).
2. Roth is a valuable planning asset for future tax optimization and best left to grow & withdraw later or pass tax free to heirs.
3. Deliberate use of partial Roth draws to top off income/pay 1 times large expenses is useful to manage ACA subsidies in early retirement, minimize IRMAA during Medicare yrs, minimize tax on SS etc...
This is why you ideally want a mix of assets in various tax buckets so you can fully utilize deductions, low brackets, zero LTCG rate, and ACA subsidy etc.
This post was edited on 7/10/25 at 4:25 pm
Posted by hottub
Member since Dec 2012
3651 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 5:00 pm to
Thread creep but fundamental question that relates to this issue.

Citizens United case stated money is speech and can’t be limited with respect to political contributions.

How is it that government can restrict money(speech according to the SCOTUS) when it comes to issues like this and other retirement accounts/investments?
This post was edited on 7/10/25 at 5:01 pm
Posted by 98eagle
Member since Sep 2020
3015 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

I thought is was "in the year you turn 55"?
Correct. Even if your Birthday is December 31st, you can use the rule of 55 as early as January 1st in the same year when you are only 54 years old. Even though you are 54 for almost an entire year, since you turn 55 in the calendar year, you can use the rule of 55 if it applies to your situation.
Posted by CharlesUFarley
Daphne, AL
Member since Jan 2022
891 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 6:24 pm to
Roll it over to an IRA. Use the SEPP (Substantially Equal Period Payments) provision of Rule 72(t) to get the money you need to retire, no penalty due as long as you stick to the rules, but you will pay ordinary income taxes.

Posted by Artificial Ignorance
Member since Feb 2025
1424 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 6:38 pm to
Penalty-free when retiring…in the year you turn 55

The key clause.
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
30886 posts
Posted on 7/10/25 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

Penalty-free when retiring…in the year you turn 55

The key clause.

Hell yeah. And my birthday is in December. Nice knowing I can access it at age 54 without penalty if I needed or wanted to.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram