- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Treblinka II...any WW2 experts on here know much about this topic?
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:24 am
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:24 am
I will start by saying that I am not a Holocaust denier. But I watched a documentary about Treblinka II (the camp which was supposedly designed and operated solely for killing), and I was actually really surprised at the lack of evidence that this camp existed and functioned as the "official" agreed upon history reports.
in the documentary they performed some limited archaeological digging, which has apparently always been disallowed out of "respect for the dead", which is in itself a little suspicious. they found a few pieces of bone and called that evidence of multiple mass graves which seems to be a pretty loose interpretation of the term "mass grave". then they found a few tiles that were supposedly gas chamber tiles, which i guess they could have been. but they were found mere inches below the grass, while other structural evidence of buildings was found much, much deeper and they stated that that depth was the original 1040s surface level.
i dont know man. for a documentary that was supposed to be presenting evidence of Treblinka II, it kind of did the opposite for me and made me ask a bunch of questions that i didnt really have before.
any WW2 experts on here know much about this topic?
the documentary is called "Treblinka: Hitler's Killing Machine", it's on Paramount I think
in the documentary they performed some limited archaeological digging, which has apparently always been disallowed out of "respect for the dead", which is in itself a little suspicious. they found a few pieces of bone and called that evidence of multiple mass graves which seems to be a pretty loose interpretation of the term "mass grave". then they found a few tiles that were supposedly gas chamber tiles, which i guess they could have been. but they were found mere inches below the grass, while other structural evidence of buildings was found much, much deeper and they stated that that depth was the original 1040s surface level.
i dont know man. for a documentary that was supposed to be presenting evidence of Treblinka II, it kind of did the opposite for me and made me ask a bunch of questions that i didnt really have before.
any WW2 experts on here know much about this topic?
the documentary is called "Treblinka: Hitler's Killing Machine", it's on Paramount I think
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 11:35 am
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:32 am to Sam Quint
I don’t know anything about that other than Jews around the Warsaw area weee funneled there, but I know they were in the works for expanding Auschwitz.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:36 am to Sam Quint
Unlike Auschwitz, this camp was razed and systematically transformed to resemble a farm by the Germans in 1943.
Clearly, they could not have done away with everything, but is it surprising that they could have done it to a fairly significant extent?
Clearly, they could not have done away with everything, but is it surprising that they could have done it to a fairly significant extent?
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:36 am to Sam Quint
Read Into that Darkness by Geeta Sereny
She interviewed the commandant of the camp.
She interviewed the commandant of the camp.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:37 am to Sam Quint
If you think Treblinka II is interesting, look up Unit 731. Based in Japan during WWII. After reading about it, you’ll appreciate we bombed the shite out of them even more.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:43 am to Boomer65
Unit 731 by Hal Gold I has been on my list for awhile.
Im glad we bombed them, but the masterminds of Unit 731 were granted immunity. We ended up taking their experimental data back to the US during Operation Paperclip.
Im glad we bombed them, but the masterminds of Unit 731 were granted immunity. We ended up taking their experimental data back to the US during Operation Paperclip.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:44 am to Sam Quint
quote:
i dont know man. for a documentary that was supposed to be presenting evidence of Treblinka II, it kind of did the opposite for me and made me ask a bunch of questions that i didnt really have before.
The Germans razed it and trucked everything away.
Their own people confirmed it.
It's not like they just abandoned it and the Russians took it like Auschwitz.
They packed up and moved.
Thousands of witnesses who were the people who actually worked there and moved it.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:45 am to Sam Quint
quote:sure
I am not a Holocaust denier.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 11:54 am to Sam Quint
quote:
Testimony of Treblinka SS Personnel
Willi Mentz:
When I came to Treblinka the camp commandant was a doctor named Dr. Eberl. He was very ambitious. It was said that he ordered more transports than could be "processed" in the camp. That meant that trains had to wait outside the camp because the occupants of the previous transport had not yet all been killed. At the time it was very hot and as a result of the long wait inside the transport trains in the intense heat many people died. At the time whole mountains of bodies lay on the platform. The Hauptsturmfuehrer Christian Wirth came to Treblinka and kicked up a terrific row. And then one day Dr. Eberl was no longer there...
For about two months I worked in the upper section of the camp and then after Eberl had gone everything in the camp was reorganized. The two parts of the camp were separated by barbed wire fences. Pine branches were used so that you could not see through the fences. The same thing was done along the route from the "transfer" area to the gas chambers...
Finally, new and larger gas chambers were built. I think that there were now five or six larger gas chambers. I cannot say exactly how many people these large gas chambers held. If the small gas chambers could hold 80-100 people, the large ones could probably hold twice that number...
Following the arrival of a transport, six to eight cars would be shunted into the camp, coming to a halt at the platform there. The commandant, his deputy Franz, Kuettner and Stadie or Maetzig would be here waiting as the transport came in. Further SS members were also present to supervise the unloading: for example, Genz and Belitz had to make absolutely sure that there was no one left in the car after the occupants had been ordered to get out.
When the Jews had got off, Stadie or Maetzig would have a short word with them. They were told something to the effect that they were a resettlement transport, that they would be given a bath and that they would receive new clothes. They were also instructed to maintain quiet and disciplined. They would continue their journey the following day.
Then the transports were taken off to the so-called "transfer" area. The women had to undress in huts and the men out in the open. The women were than led through a passageway, known as the "tube", to the gas chambers. On the way they had to pass a hut where they had to hand in their jewelery and valuables.
Kurt Franz:
I cannot say how many Jews in total were gassed in Treblinka. On average each day a large train arrived. Sometimes there were even two. This however was not so common.
In Treblinka I was commander of the Ukrainian guard unit as I had been in Belzec. In Treblinka as in Belzec the unit consisted of sixty to eighty men. The Ukrainians' main task was to man the guard posts around the camp perimeter. After the uprising in August 1943 I ran the camp more or less single-handedly for a month; however, during that period no gassings were undertaken.
It was during that period that the original camp was demolished. Everything was leveled off off and lupins were planted...
SS Oberscharfuehrer Heinrich Matthes:
During the entire time I was in Treblinka, I served in the upper camp. The upper camp was that part of Treblinka with the gas chambers, where the Jews were killed and their corpses laid in large pits and later burned.
About fourteen Germans carried out services in the upper camp. There were two Ukrainians permanently in the upper camp. One of them was called Nikolai, the other was a short man, I don't remember his name... These two Ukrainians who lived in the upper camp served in the gas chambers. They also took care of the engine room when Fritz Schmidt was absent. Usually this Schmidt was in charge of the engine room. In my opinion, as a civilian he was either a mechanic or a driver...
All together, six gas chambers were active. According to my estimate, about 300 people could enter each gas chamber. The people went into the gas chamber without resistance. Those who were at the end, the Ukrainian guards had to push inside. I personally saw how the Ukrainians pushed the people with their rifle butts...
The gas chambers were closed for about thirty minutes. Then Schmidt stopped the gassing, and the two Ukrainians who were in the engine room opened the gas chambers from the other side.
LINK
Posted on 7/3/25 at 12:48 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
sure
questioning the official history of anything doesnt make someone a denier. i believe the Holocaust happened. but like any other historical topic, i know there is no way that the official version that we learn is the entire truth or is entirely truthful. that same standard goes for any topic.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 12:52 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
Unlike Auschwitz, this camp was razed and systematically transformed to resemble a farm by the Germans in 1943.
Clearly, they could not have done away with everything, but is it surprising that they could have done it to a fairly significant extent?
well, to your point, if the camp was designed to be, for lack of a better word, expeditionary and therefore temporary, i can see where they would be able to break it down and move it away with little evidence.
i guess the way it was presented, and what i always had in my mind, was a permanent camp that was hurriedly dismantled as the Nazis tried to cover up their crimes as they began to realize they were going to lose the war. if it was ALWAYS designed to be dismantled, then that definitely is a perspective i didnt really consider.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 12:54 pm to Sam Quint
You touched the third rail.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 12:55 pm to Sam Quint
quote:
if it was ALWAYS designed to be dismantled, then that definitely is a perspective i didnt really consider.
I don’t know that it was.
What I do know, having worked for a German manufacturer of highly engineered process compressors, is that they are “thorough” people who rarely do anything half-assed.
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 7/3/25 at 12:57 pm to Sam Quint
The Germans actually did a pretty incredibly job of wiping out the evidence of what happened at Treblinka. They razed it to the ground, planted over it, and burned many of the nearby towns - killing as many villagers as they could in the process. Not only that, but the Soviet Union didn't initially work to preserve the site. It wasn't until the late-50s that extensive preservation efforts had begun. By that time many of the camp's remaining artifacts had been scavenged up by treasure seekers, animals, and god knows what else.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 12:58 pm to Sam Quint
quote:
questioning the official history of anything doesnt make someone a denier. i believe the Holocaust happened. but like any other historical topic, i know there is no way that the official version that we learn is the entire truth or is entirely truthful. that same standard goes for any topic.
History is written by the victors. The truth usually ranges somewhere around the middle.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 12:59 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
I don’t know that it was.
oh, i know. i jsut sort of thought of that as i was typing a reply to you. there's no reason that it couldnt have been, so it stands to reason that it easily COULD have been, which would explain it. i wonder if there is any historical records or interviews that would indicate that it was always designed to be temporary.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:01 pm to Sam Quint
quote:
I am not a Holocaust denier.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:01 pm to Sam Quint
quote:
i wonder if there is any historical records or interviews that would indicate that it was always designed to be temporary.
It would be interesting to know what their plan was once they reached a certain amount of “completeness” to the overall process.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 1:03 pm to Sam Quint
Supposedly , 750,000 people were gassed and then buried in a mass grave … then dug up after nine months and burned over railroad ties.
So basically , the population of New Orleans and Baton Rouge in a mass grave. That would be one huge freaking pit. And then dig them up and if you lay them side by side and stack three high ( about 36 inches wide ) these railroad ties they would be burned over , would stretch 70 freaking miles … in the middle of a war . And then to burn bodies over railroad ties you would need probably the entirety of the Ardennes forest ….
So basically , the population of New Orleans and Baton Rouge in a mass grave. That would be one huge freaking pit. And then dig them up and if you lay them side by side and stack three high ( about 36 inches wide ) these railroad ties they would be burned over , would stretch 70 freaking miles … in the middle of a war . And then to burn bodies over railroad ties you would need probably the entirety of the Ardennes forest ….
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 1:12 pm
Popular
Back to top


18








