Started By
Message

As a U.S. citizen, when you travel abroad are you still under the jurisdiction of the U.S.

Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:48 am
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:48 am
It sure feels that way.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
27482 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:49 am to
Yes, you are.
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
5760 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:52 am to
Like when the American college student got sent to a NK prison for stealing a poster? No, you aren’t
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
92446 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:54 am to
Ask Michael Fay if he was protected by the jurisdiction of the US when he got lashed.
Posted by TheFolker
Member since Aug 2011
5439 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:54 am to
It’s a US passport that allows you to do so so yes.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
44108 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:54 am to
Yes, if what you are if it involves a US citizen or US interest (taxes, spying..)
So no you can't kill you wife on vacation.
Posted by BamaCoaster
God's Gulf
Member since Apr 2016
6611 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:55 am to
quote:

As a U.S. citizen, when you travel abroad are you still under the jurisdiction of the U.S.


No. You are under the laws of the country you are in.
What kind of question is this?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465831 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:57 am to
You're also under the jurisdiction of the country you're physically present in

You can be under jurisdiction of more than one country at the same time
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465831 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Like when the American college student got sent to a NK prison for stealing a poster? No, you aren’t

What do you think this example is showing, exactly?

A better one is a sex tourist who goes to Thailand to have sex with children. They can be prosecuted both by the US and Thailand, as they're subject to the jurisdiction of both countries in that scenario.
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
18956 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:59 am to
UCMJ applies anywhere in the world for those that fall under it.
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
5760 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:59 am to
True
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
27482 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Like when the American college student got sent to a NK prison for stealing a poster? No, you aren’t

Think it through. One can be under the jurisdiction of the U.S. and of the laws of any place where you are. US law applies to you when abroad. Treasury rules control what you can do with your money. If you commit a crime here and leave, the U.S. can have you brought back. You can be taxed here on money that is overseas. There are a million ways that you are still under U.S. jurisdiction when you are not physically present here.
Posted by LSU0358
Member since Jan 2005
8086 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 9:05 am to
If you are doing something crooked on taxes you'll be under US jurisdiction. If you are doing lines of coke or kill your wife, you'll be under jurisdiction of the country you are physically in.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465831 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 9:05 am to
I know that's a gross example, but it's one with tenuous jurisdiction by the US (as the person is abroad and wouldn't normally be under US jurisdiction really) that has real examples to reference so this isn't some hypothetical exercise.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
48801 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 9:06 am to
quote:

UCMJ applies anywhere in the world for those that fall under it.


This isn't the same. I am sure you already know this.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
21277 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 9:10 am to
This question will probably go on being debated for many pages.... It will be great once SCOTUS correctly interprets the question of jurisdiction and the intention of the law at the time it was written and end birthright citizenship.
Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
17018 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 9:54 am to
It depends on what you mean by ‘jurisdiction.’ The US doesn’t have jurisdiction in Amsterdam for a host of illegal activities. As a US citizen the US will offer support for some things in host countries. This has to be better defined or we are shooting in the dark.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
18684 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Ask Michael Fay if he was protected by the jurisdiction of the US when he got lashed.


I moved to Mandeville from Roanoke VA. many years ago. I was talking to the driver who was to deliver the load and was showing him on a map my location there, he knew the neighborhood. He said "remember that kid who got caned? I just moved his mom to Mandeville, she said the kid should have gotten his arse beat, and the father wanted to do the talk show circuit".

Apparently he was living with his mom and stepdad over there and returned to live with his father to do the talk shows.

Kid has been in a lot of trouble since, he was and is no innocent babe.
Posted by texas tortilla
houston
Member since Dec 2015
4003 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 9:58 am to
all i know is that if you are a lesbian, black, pot smoking, basketball player, the democrats will try and help you. otherwise, you better hope trump is president.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
59043 posts
Posted on 6/28/25 at 10:01 am to
Absolutely not. Likewise, when non-citizens commit crimes in the US, they are tried in the US, not their native countries.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram