- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
We probably have not hit Iran with bunker busters yet b/c of the technical challenges.
Posted on 6/20/25 at 8:46 am
Posted on 6/20/25 at 8:46 am
Here is a chart of the depth of Iran's nuclear facilities based on publicly available information.
Our best bunker buster, the GBU-57 MOP can penetrate sandy soil 60-70 meters deep. It took ~$400 million to develop and I've seen unit cost of $3.5 million to $15 million. I don't know why there is such a big variance on cost per unit. Anyway, the point is they are pretty expensive.
It's pretty obvious that if Iran has nuclear enriching capability above 90% they have moved all that capability to the New-Natanz facility. At 150 meters deep the equipment is probably pretty safe from our best bunker busters even with multiple attacks. And remember it's not 150 meters deep under sand. It's 150 meters deep under reinforced concrete and natural rock.
If this were an easy bunker buster activity like taking out the original or old Natanz facility it would have been done already.
Not only is bunker busting a political challenge for the administration but it's also a technical challenge for our military. I'm not saying the technical challenge cannot be overcome I'm just pointing out that this is a big part of the picture and a big data point in Trump's decision making process. Is bunker busting even practical?
Our best bunker buster, the GBU-57 MOP can penetrate sandy soil 60-70 meters deep. It took ~$400 million to develop and I've seen unit cost of $3.5 million to $15 million. I don't know why there is such a big variance on cost per unit. Anyway, the point is they are pretty expensive.
It's pretty obvious that if Iran has nuclear enriching capability above 90% they have moved all that capability to the New-Natanz facility. At 150 meters deep the equipment is probably pretty safe from our best bunker busters even with multiple attacks. And remember it's not 150 meters deep under sand. It's 150 meters deep under reinforced concrete and natural rock.
If this were an easy bunker buster activity like taking out the original or old Natanz facility it would have been done already.
Not only is bunker busting a political challenge for the administration but it's also a technical challenge for our military. I'm not saying the technical challenge cannot be overcome I'm just pointing out that this is a big part of the picture and a big data point in Trump's decision making process. Is bunker busting even practical?
25
Posted on 6/20/25 at 8:55 am to GumboPot
quote:
Is bunker busting even practical?
Its likely you need a tactical nuke.
The Russians have been targeting cheyenne mountain which is 2,000 feet down.
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:08 am to GumboPot
BREAKING CONSPIRACY THEORY: Trump/Musk contretemps was all misdirection to free up Musk to develop next generation bunker buster shaped like a Tesla. You heard it here first.
This post was edited on 6/20/25 at 9:14 am
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:11 am to GumboPot
Good post
However, I'd like to meet whoever decided we needed that chart
However, I'd like to meet whoever decided we needed that chart
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:12 am to GumboPot
quote:I'm guessing that AND (not 'or') the Isralis have some sort of alt plan.
We probably have not hit Iran with bunker busters yet b/c of the technical challenges.
Now that plan might be in the the discussion phase of 'will work/will not work' or in the execution phase where we are waiting to see, but I think that is a factor along with the technical issues that lead to the "within 2 weeks".
As I put in another post, I'm betting there's some mountain in remote Utah being demolished by GBU-57's right now.
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:15 am to GumboPot
I read about a tunneling method where you essentially drop successive bombs down the hole created by the earlier ones.
Seems pretty complex but if you can put a GPS on them then maybe it’s possible.
They’re so heavy that maybe they’re not guided and that’s the challenge. They’re just gravity based free falling.
Seems pretty complex but if you can put a GPS on them then maybe it’s possible.
They’re so heavy that maybe they’re not guided and that’s the challenge. They’re just gravity based free falling.
This post was edited on 6/20/25 at 9:16 am
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:16 am to I20goon
Just have Tom Cruiseberg get to the elevator, place a bomb in it and send it down to the bottom. It explodes. Problem solved.
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:18 am to boosiebadazz
quote:The GBU-57's and 29's are indeed guided (that's the "G") by GPS. It has control surfaces.
They’re so heavy that maybe they’re not guided and that’s the challenge. They’re just gravity based free falling.
Pretty sure, as with most of our bombs, a laser package could be affixed. But that's where size might come into play and not work as you mentioned.
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:22 am to goatmilker
quote:My prediction is something close (well, not really) to that.
Just have Tom Cruiseberg get to the elevator, place a bomb in it and send it down to the bottom. It explodes. Problem solved.
With Israeli air cover extending out say 200 km, I think they are going to put paratroopers (or elite units) on the ground and, after killing everyone, will demolish it in a way to bring the roof down.
There's several issues here obviously, w/extraction being one of those. You can jump out of a C-130, you can't jump in though. And Israelis typically do not do suicide missions. There is an airstrip close, but can you protect both for the duration of the mission?
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:40 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
They’re just gravity based free falling.
Right.
quote:
They’re so heavy that maybe they’re not guided and that’s the challenge.
They are guided and have military grade GPS guidance units on the back of the bombs.
quote:
I read about a tunneling method where you essentially drop successive bombs down the hole created by the earlier ones.
This is how the technical challenge can potentially be overcome.
But it's not that simple.
If if a bunker buster penetrates 60 meters deep (best case scenario hitting sand at 90 degrees and full speed, i.e., max velocity) then detonates, the hole just backfills with earth again and you are back to where you started. With that kind of penetration I doubt much spoil is removed from the first detonation and this is under optimum conditions.
The reality is the bunker buster is not entering at full velocity because there is a horizontal component from the bomber from where it was released. That is a big loss of energy not being directed to it's target below.
The other challenge is geology. We are not dealing with sand here. Apparently the overburden at the New Natanz facility is ~90 meters deep of limestone and dolomite. Below 90 meters is even harder granite.
It's also my understanding that there are no ventilation vents. O2 is produced and CO2 is scrubbed like we do on submarines for areas occupied by humans.
This might be why the Iranians are playing such hardball right now with negotiations. They have a lot of confidence in protecting their facilities.
The Israelis know this so that why they took out the next best thing, Iranian human knowledge. That is, if you can't take out the equipment, take out the people that know how to operated the equipment. Apparently Israel has done this already to some extent.
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:49 am to GumboPot
quote:
It took ~$400 million to develop
It's a sad condemnation of our military spending when I read that and my immediate thought is "wow, that sounds Iike a hell of a deal"
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:50 am to GumboPot
This is top tier analysis and is a likely reason. 
ETA: not sarcasm
ETA: not sarcasm
This post was edited on 6/20/25 at 9:51 am
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:55 am to GumboPot
Just bomb the exits. Done just like that.
Posted on 6/20/25 at 10:04 am to Big Chipper
quote:That would not achieve the objective.
Just bomb the exits. Done just like that.
Two things must be done:
1. the equipment within destroyed
2. the site itself rendered unusable (i.e. caved in)
Posted on 6/20/25 at 10:04 am to I20goon
quote:
There is an airstrip close, but can you protect both for the duration of the mission?
A few AC130's with some A10's as backups could keep any Iranian ground forces away.
As bad arse as the A10 is the AC130 is far more lethal.
Posted on 6/20/25 at 10:07 am to Big Chipper
quote:
Just bomb the exits. Done just like that.
And how many months until the Iranians dig the openings out and get everything running again?
Posted on 6/20/25 at 10:07 am to Narax
quote:
The Russians have been targeting cheyenne mountain which is 2,000 feet down.
If there ever happens, I will be completely vaporized and won't be able to at least enjoy the last few minutes.
Posted on 6/20/25 at 10:18 am to alphaandomega
quote:Puffffff!
A few AC130's with some A10's as backups could keep any Iranian ground forces away.
As bad arse as the A10 is the AC130 is far more lethal.
Agreed. Both are needed. Will literally have to pick off individuals and individual stray vehicles. As well as any helos. It will take a while. Days.
And will have to prevent that airfield from being put out of action by the Iranians to strand them. That would be my first action if I was the IRGC. A truck bomb, shaped, with a suicide driver driving out on the runway to crater it. The Israeli's morale would suffer. I guess you could then Chinook in runway mats.... but damn, that's a lot of runs going a long way from Israel.
The question is: Can Israel alone provide the cover that Puff and the Warthogs would do. Thats the point here... to do it without us.
Posted on 6/20/25 at 10:19 am to Big Chipper
quote:
Just bomb the exits. Done just like that.
If you are interested here are the lat long coordinates of the New Natanz facility:
Screen shots from Google Earth:
Location relative to Tehran:
Aerial of the New Natanz facility:
Looks like entry and exit points to underground facilities:
Posted on 6/20/25 at 10:21 am to GumboPot
Just drop Chris Christie on Nanatz. Problem solved. Would also be much cheaper.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News