- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Whistleblower: Lockheed Martin Awarded Bonuses Based on Race
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:34 pm
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:34 pm
City Journal
La Wanda looks like a blast to work for
She has deleted her LinkedIn account
She is going to cost Lockheed a bunch of money in lawsuits.
ETA:
Lockheed has responded
quote:
The company allegedly required managers to reward employees “on the basis of their skin color alone and contrary to documented performance.”
quote:
The story began in December 2022, when the whistleblower was preparing recommendations for the aeronautics division’s year-end bonuses.
quote:
Santiago Bulnes, a vice president who now leads engineering on Lockheed’s F-35 program, wrote an email to the whistleblower. “I got a call from [human resources director] La Wanda [Moorer] last night regarding diversity stats on comp adder,” Bulnes, who did not respond to a request for comment, said. “They took a run at getting your few approved and we’re told that we need to fit in the box. I asked her to send you the list of diversity names to simplify the task of finding the best in the group.”
quote:
Next, our source claims, officials in Lockheed’s human resources department made the demand explicit. One communication instructed the whistleblower to add more than a dozen minorities to the list and recommended removing an equal number of “non-minority” employees. The implication was clear—“increasing POC for Comp Adder will result in removing equal count of non-minority”—and the instructions were deliberate, recommending specific race swaps by manager. For example, for one team, human resources officials instructed the whistleblower to “increase POC 4 and decrease non-minority 4.”
quote:
The whistleblower tried to protest this decision and filed an ethics complaint, arguing that the policy was unethical and could expose the company to legal liability, but management insisted. “Our HR counsel told me that while this may present business risk, it was the ‘less[e]r of two evils.’”
La Wanda looks like a blast to work for
She has deleted her LinkedIn account
She is going to cost Lockheed a bunch of money in lawsuits.
ETA:
Lockheed has responded
This post was edited on 6/13/25 at 6:50 pm
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:36 pm to DiamondDog
quote:
Holy Forehead
They use it to test land the F35
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:38 pm to boxcarbarney
Yeah, you can't do that. They're going to pay out the arse for this.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:40 pm to LordSaintly
I just want it known that I think that our defense contractors playing Dei games to make the woke lunatics happy is an awful idea. Thanks leftist for yet another example of your dumbass policies.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:41 pm to boxcarbarney
The settlements between individuals and probably the government are going to be stupid money and they deserve it
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:42 pm to jnethe1
Of all the things Lockheed has been attached to this is light work
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:44 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:Oh, look at dawgfan disregarding racism by a major company.
Of all the things Lockheed has been attached to this is light work
I’m shocked.
SHOCKED!
Well, not that shocked.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:45 pm to Scruffy
When did I disregard racism? Obviously this isn't legal but the poster I was replying to was melting down acting like this is somehow the worst thing Lockheed has ever done
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:46 pm to boxcarbarney
Can you imagine giving bonuses based solely on race?
Sounds like something my company would do.
Sounds like something my company would do.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:46 pm to boxcarbarney
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/13/25 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:46 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
When did I disregard racism?
quote:
Of all the things Lockheed has been attached to this is light work
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:50 pm to Scruffy
Yes it is light work opposed to lobbying Congress in favor of warhawks. They literally profit off of wars and thereby profiting off killing people often in pointless wars.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:51 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
They literally profit off of wars and thereby profiting off killing people often in pointless wars.
well, that's kind of what they do, put warheads on foreheads

Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:52 pm to boxcarbarney
quote:as an ex employee of Lockheed during this time, I can tell you this response is bullshite.
Lockheed has responded
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:52 pm to boxcarbarney
Heads got to start rolling for this bullshite. It’s legitimately insane behavior and no one (other than the taxpayer and retain investor of course) ever has to actually pay the piper
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:53 pm to 777Tiger
Well yes but they spend millions in lobbying. You think all these warhawks in Congress have a war boner just because?
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:54 pm to boxcarbarney
Companies on the federal tit are screwed because unless democrats never when another presidency they are going to have to pivot from decency to trash whenever a democrat is elected.
Democrats are trash and demand trash and federal contractors can either not be federal contractors or follow the current leadership.
Democrats are trash and demand trash and federal contractors can either not be federal contractors or follow the current leadership.
Posted on 6/13/25 at 6:54 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
Well yes but they spend millions in lobbying. You think all these warhawks in Congress have a war boner just because?
Focus on the task at hand. Both can be wrong
Popular
Back to top
