- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What a crazy day at the Supreme Court
Posted on 6/5/25 at 10:39 am
Posted on 6/5/25 at 10:39 am
Justice Jackson defending the white people's right to assert antidiscrimination claims
Justice Kagan defending gun rights
Justice Sotomayor defending the Catholic Church from interference.
Justice Kagan defending gun rights
Justice Sotomayor defending the Catholic Church from interference.
9
Posted on 6/5/25 at 10:40 am to anc
quote:
Justice Jackson defending the white people's right to assert antidiscrimination claims
I am legitimately surprised by this.
I have doubts this is accurate. Do you have a transcript?
Posted on 6/5/25 at 10:40 am to anc
Perhaps the USSC isn't as radical as has been projected?
Posted on 6/5/25 at 10:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Perhaps the USSC isn't as radical as has been projected?
Perhaps the radicals voted this way knowing they would be in the minority to give the illusion they are not radical.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 10:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Perhaps the USSC isn't as radical as has been projected?
As a whole maybe not, but Jackson has largely just ignored the Constitution in many cases that I have seen to get any result she desires
Posted on 6/5/25 at 10:45 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Perhaps the radicals voted this way knowing they would be in the minority to give the illusion they are not radical.
Yeah, I think they save their bullets to rule against Trump’s agenda on the things that they perceive to matter most. That’s a complete contradiction to what their job is, but I truly believe it.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 10:56 am to anc
A Unanimous ruling on this one is surprising
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 11:00 am to Fun Bunch
Clarence looks like and old bulldog sitting up there. 
Posted on 6/5/25 at 11:02 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I have doubts this is accurate. Do you have a transcript?
Thread on it.
Wrote the opinion saying reverse discrimination is still discrimination.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 11:03 am to Fun Bunch
all of this:
quote:
#BREAKING: The Supreme Court just ruled UNANIMOUSLY that “reverse discrimination” IS discrimination
In other words, discriminating against someone because they’re white and heterosexual IS illegal under the Civil Rights Act
I can’t believe this had to be litigated at the Supreme Court, but this is a BIG win regardless.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 11:05 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/5/25 at 11:16 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Perhaps the USSC isn't as radical as has been projected?
Posted on 6/5/25 at 11:58 am to Fun Bunch
That would outright make DEI hiring illegal as we always thought right?
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Perhaps the USSC isn't as radical as has been projected?
They're radical, but can't find a way to legitimize discriminating against white people.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:02 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
I have doubts this is accurate. Do you have a transcript?
I just read an NPR story about this. Pleasantly surprised by the outcome. Discrimination is discrimination.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:03 pm to Nosevens
quote:
That would outright make DEI hiring illegal as we always thought right?
Has anyone be able to actually prove DEI hiring? I’ve only seen vague accusations.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:12 pm to Bestbank Tiger
Is the term discrimination reserved for certain races? Would it not all just be considered discrimination?
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:20 pm to anc
It's a scary and sad time in our country when people are surprised that any judiciary ignored their personal opinions and ruled on what the actual law is.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:22 pm to 4cubbies
Just about every publicly traded company has been flaunting their DEI goals and quotas the past 5-10 years. They should all be pretty worried right now.
Any white person who has applied for a job but wasn't selected at a company with publicly advertised DEI goals probably has a case at this point.
Any white person who has applied for a job but wasn't selected at a company with publicly advertised DEI goals probably has a case at this point.
This post was edited on 6/5/25 at 12:25 pm
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News