- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
GOP will begin working on new Russian sanctions 500% tariffs next week
Posted on 6/1/25 at 9:26 am
Posted on 6/1/25 at 9:26 am
https://nypost.com/2025/05/31/us-news/senate-will-go-forward-with-russia-sanctions-bill-sen-lindsey-graham-says/
WASHINGTON — The Senate will “start moving” on a bill imposing more sanctions on the Kremlin following talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said.
“I would expect next week that the Senate will start moving the sanctions bill,” Graham, an ally of President Trump but also a firm backer of Ukraine’s war efforts, said Friday, according to The Kyiv Independent.
“There are House members that are ready to move in the House, and you’ll see congressional action,” he added. “President Trump said that the next two-week period will be outcome-determined.”
The bipartisan meeting with Ukraine’s leader included Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who like Graham supports the legislation applying a 500% tariff on Russian oil, gas, uranium and other products.
Neither sits on the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee where the bill, which has racked up at least 80 co-sponsors, is currently under consideration.
At least 82 senators are prepared to vote for it if it heads to the Senate floor, Graham told the outlet.
“I’ve never been more optimistic than I am today,” he added, when asked whether Trump would sign it.
“Russia faces a stark choice: peace or crippling sanctions,” Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) said in a Senate floor speech on May 20.
“President Trump has spoken forcefully of swift, severe consequences if Russia fails to honor a ceasefire.”
On June 2, delegations from Russia and Ukraine had been expected to meet for talks in Istanbul — but Graham said he doesn’t have “any hope at all that Russia is interested in peace” given drone strikes in Ukraine that killed more than a dozen civilians on May 25.
It was the largest aerial bombardment in the war to date, with 355 drones and nine cruise missiles being unleashed.
Trump — who promised to end the war “on day one” of his second presidential term — slammed Putin as “absolutely crazy” following the strikes, but stopped short of announcing tougher sanctions on the regime despite having threatened them earlier this month.
“Russia is playing a game at the expense of the world, not just the United States,” Graham said, noting how oil from Moscow is prolonging the war by being sold to China and India.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has indicated that curtailing NATO expansion from the West, relaxing sanctions and official recognition of Ukraine’s neutral status are redlines for him in peace talks.
The Kremlin was not targeted with 10% baseline global tariffs as part of Trump’s “Liberation Day” announcement in April, though the White House indicated previous sanctions made it irrelevant.
European leaders have already slapped sanctions on Russia over Putin’s refusal to accept a US-backed cease-fire deal.
“It’s clear to almost anyone — Putin is not remotely interested in anything that would lead to peace,” Graham added. “So there’s a card game going on this summer. The first cards are going to be played by the United States Senate and the House.”
Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) backs stricter sanctions, and Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) also suggested last week that the US should also send “more lethal weapons” to Ukraine.
“If Ukraine falls, it will always be known in the history books that it happened with Trump doing little to help Ukraine defend themselves with the means we have available,” Bacon said.
WASHINGTON — The Senate will “start moving” on a bill imposing more sanctions on the Kremlin following talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said.
“I would expect next week that the Senate will start moving the sanctions bill,” Graham, an ally of President Trump but also a firm backer of Ukraine’s war efforts, said Friday, according to The Kyiv Independent.
“There are House members that are ready to move in the House, and you’ll see congressional action,” he added. “President Trump said that the next two-week period will be outcome-determined.”

The bipartisan meeting with Ukraine’s leader included Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who like Graham supports the legislation applying a 500% tariff on Russian oil, gas, uranium and other products.
Neither sits on the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee where the bill, which has racked up at least 80 co-sponsors, is currently under consideration.
At least 82 senators are prepared to vote for it if it heads to the Senate floor, Graham told the outlet.
“I’ve never been more optimistic than I am today,” he added, when asked whether Trump would sign it.
“Russia faces a stark choice: peace or crippling sanctions,” Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) said in a Senate floor speech on May 20.
“President Trump has spoken forcefully of swift, severe consequences if Russia fails to honor a ceasefire.”
On June 2, delegations from Russia and Ukraine had been expected to meet for talks in Istanbul — but Graham said he doesn’t have “any hope at all that Russia is interested in peace” given drone strikes in Ukraine that killed more than a dozen civilians on May 25.
It was the largest aerial bombardment in the war to date, with 355 drones and nine cruise missiles being unleashed.
Trump — who promised to end the war “on day one” of his second presidential term — slammed Putin as “absolutely crazy” following the strikes, but stopped short of announcing tougher sanctions on the regime despite having threatened them earlier this month.
“Russia is playing a game at the expense of the world, not just the United States,” Graham said, noting how oil from Moscow is prolonging the war by being sold to China and India.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has indicated that curtailing NATO expansion from the West, relaxing sanctions and official recognition of Ukraine’s neutral status are redlines for him in peace talks.
The Kremlin was not targeted with 10% baseline global tariffs as part of Trump’s “Liberation Day” announcement in April, though the White House indicated previous sanctions made it irrelevant.
European leaders have already slapped sanctions on Russia over Putin’s refusal to accept a US-backed cease-fire deal.
“It’s clear to almost anyone — Putin is not remotely interested in anything that would lead to peace,” Graham added. “So there’s a card game going on this summer. The first cards are going to be played by the United States Senate and the House.”
Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) backs stricter sanctions, and Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) also suggested last week that the US should also send “more lethal weapons” to Ukraine.
“If Ukraine falls, it will always be known in the history books that it happened with Trump doing little to help Ukraine defend themselves with the means we have available,” Bacon said.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 9:29 am to RelicBatches86
So now Democrats like tariffs?
Posted on 6/1/25 at 9:32 am to IT_Dawg
I think the idea is to call sanctions tariffs so Trump will like them. 

Posted on 6/1/25 at 9:33 am to IT_Dawg
You can be against the way something is being used, without being against something completely. You know, nuance.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 9:35 am to RelicBatches86
500% TARIFFS on ALL those Russian imports!!!! Good job Lyndsley! 1 whole billion in fertilizer.
Edit to add take a look at ALL those Russian imports LINK
Edit to add take a look at ALL those Russian imports LINK
This post was edited on 6/1/25 at 9:37 am
Posted on 6/1/25 at 9:35 am to RelicBatches86
Well we wanted Congress to quit being so quiet about everything.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 9:42 am to AGGIES
Regardless, Ukraine will still lose the war. Graham just wants to make sure russia/USA relations stay bad.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 9:55 am to RelicBatches86
The worst economic sanctions are placed on ourselfs not Russia by that i mean another $100 billion these grifters in congress will steal from the American taxpayer very soon.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 9:56 am to lotik
quote:
You can be against the way something is being used, without being against something completely. You know, nuance.
You should inform leftist tards like yourself.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 9:56 am to lotik
quote:
without being against something completely
So democrats celebrate and encourage wars that do not benefit America or hurt America?
Posted on 6/1/25 at 9:58 am to BestBanker
quote:
500% TARIFFS on ALL those Russian imports!!!! Good job Lyndsley! 1 whole billion in fertilizer.
Now we get to listen to farmers and their poor mouthing bullshite. Just wait for it, it's coming.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 10:01 am to RelicBatches86
quote:Yet these 82 United States senators aren't prepared to vote for anything that actually benefits the United States.
At least 82 senators are prepared to vote for it if it heads to the Senate floor, Graham told the outlet
quote:Why haven't they been "ready to move" on anything for the American people?
There are House members that are ready to move in the House, and you’ll see congressional action,” he added.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 10:04 am to RelicBatches86
Primary Graham and Massie
Posted on 6/1/25 at 10:08 am to RelicBatches86
Does this mean liberals will start hanging Russian flags outside their homes now?
Posted on 6/1/25 at 10:29 am to RelicBatches86
What would these tariffs accomplish? We don’t import from Russia
Posted on 6/1/25 at 10:31 am to texas tortilla
quote:
Graham just wants to make sure russia/USA relations stay bad.
This
Posted on 6/1/25 at 10:34 am to BestBanker
quote:
1 whole billion in fertilizer.
We import around 8.7 billion total in fertilizer from all sources. The fertile market in US is about 45 billion.
It’s not insignificant and could raise fertilizer prices for farmers who are already struggling.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 10:34 am to AGGIES
quote:
Well we wanted Congress to quit being so quiet about everything.
This is a “careful what you wish for” moment

Posted on 6/1/25 at 10:41 am to deltaland
quote:I can't wait for the halcyon days of farmers not struggling.
farmers who are already struggling.
Popular
Back to top
