- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Denmark raises retirement age to 70
Posted on 5/26/25 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 5/26/25 at 2:37 pm
quote:
CNN
—
Denmark is set to have the highest retirement age in Europe, after lawmakers voted to raise it to 70.
Parliamentarians passed a bill mandating the rise on Thursday, with 81 votes in favor and 21 against.
The new law will apply to people born after December 31, 1970. The current retirement age is 67 on average, but it can go up to 69 for those born on January 1, 1967, or later.
LINK
Props to Denmark. The amount of political courage it takes to do that is sadly absent in the halls of our congress.
The vote wasn’t even close either. It passed 81-21.
The Scandinavians may have the wrong model of economic stewardship overall, but at least they understand how to *fund* their system. They are not afraid to tax the crap out of their middle classes, because they understand it’s where the taxable income is located.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 2:39 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
They are not afraid to tax the crap out of their middle classes, because they understand it’s where the taxable income is located.
Do you think the solution in this country is to tax the crap out of the middle class?
Posted on 5/26/25 at 2:40 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
It's spending that is the problem.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 2:45 pm to fallguy_1978
No, not at all.
But our method is to have insane levels of spending without paying for it
The Danes opt to have insane levels of spending but refuse to go into debt to fund it.
But our method is to have insane levels of spending without paying for it
The Danes opt to have insane levels of spending but refuse to go into debt to fund it.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 2:50 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Ah, mit moderland
Posted on 5/26/25 at 2:50 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Well, those types of policies might work in fairly homogeneous societies, but they'd never work here.
I suspect we'll continue to raise the retirement age, maybe remove the income cap on social security, but any party that raised taxes significantly on the middle class would be thrown out of office the next election.
I suspect we'll continue to raise the retirement age, maybe remove the income cap on social security, but any party that raised taxes significantly on the middle class would be thrown out of office the next election.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 3:24 pm to fallguy_1978
ahh yes denmark much like sweden. socialist policies and the marginal tax rate @ 59%. frick that.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 5/26/25 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 5/26/25 at 3:44 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
The problem isn’t retirement age in the us..
It’s the bloat of social services crippling the current and future US tax payers. I wish people 40 and under could “opt out” of SS and invest the money in something better that wasn’t a government Ponzi scheme.
It’s the bloat of social services crippling the current and future US tax payers. I wish people 40 and under could “opt out” of SS and invest the money in something better that wasn’t a government Ponzi scheme.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 3:56 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
They are not afraid to tax the crap out of their middle classes
yay
Posted on 5/26/25 at 3:59 pm to olemissfan26
quote:
It’s the bloat of social services crippling the current and future US tax payers. I wish people 40 and under could “opt out” of SS and invest the money in something better that wasn’t a government Ponzi scheme.
It would be a much better option if you could remain disciplined and still get the employer match. I might be past the point where I'd be better off at 47.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:02 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
It would be a much better option if you could remain disciplined and still get the employer match. I might be past the point where I'd be better off at 47.
I’ll be 44 in a month and not sure it would be beneficial for my wife and I at this point.
I’ve paid $134k in and my employer has paid $136k. My wife is probably similar so that’s 540k that I would love to have in my own account. Right now if we work til full retirement age and wait until 70 to take SS we would get 10k per month. I’m not sure I want to work much past 55-59 at this point so no telling where it will shake out for me.
Do you know if you have to work all the way to 67 to get full benefits or can you achieve that earlier if you retire at 58 but don’t take it until 70?
This post was edited on 5/26/25 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:19 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Props to Denmark.
lol
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:39 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Who the frick wants to work until 70 or wait until then to get your money back? What's average life expectancy, 75 - 80 yrs old?
They've turned us into indentured servants. frick this gay earth!
They've turned us into indentured servants. frick this gay earth!
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:40 pm to HailToTheChiz
quote:
It's spending that is the problem.
Cut govt spending by 50% at all levels, and no sane person would notice.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:45 pm to Rize
quote:
Do you know if you have to work all the way to 67 to get full benefits or can you achieve that earlier if you retire at 58 but don’t take it until 70?
I believe it only matters when you start collecting.
Imagine if y'all had been getting 7-10% returns on that money the last 20+ years. It's a rip off
This post was edited on 5/27/25 at 7:56 pm
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:01 pm to fallguy_1978
yup. imagine having had all your SS tax money thrown in just a S&P 500 mutual fund decades back since there were no ETFs then. Imagine the $$ you would have now.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:18 pm to Fat Bastard
I started working on the books in 1994. My wife a few years earlier than that. We'd have been set for life by 60 with just that money alone most likely and could leave it all to our kids if we die early.
Instead we've had to save like it isn't there because it might not be.
Instead we've had to save like it isn't there because it might not be.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:20 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I retired at 52 from the fire service. Frick retiring at 70
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:23 pm to Mushroom1968
quote:
I retired at 52 from the fire service. Frick retiring at 70
I'm 5 years away from 52 and there's a 0% chance I'll be able to retire at that age. I'm hoping for 62 but I'll have to deal with a 3 year gap in health coverage. Not very many of us have pensions these days.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:29 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
I'm hoping for 62 but I'll have to deal with a 3 year gap in health coverage.
Yea I’m paying a massive amount more to stay on city’s insurance and also no HSA now that I’m retired. I still have 2 kids on my insurance and wife so it went up dramatically once I retired
quote:
Not very many of us have pensions these days.
True but I still recommend to my kids to get a degree or learn a trade. Fire service isn’t for the old, and you get old quick there. Most of my non firefighter buddies who are still working have good careers and seem happy even though they have a ways to go til retirement.
Popular
Back to top


19










