- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Unpopular Opinion: #20 should be unretired in football
Posted on 5/23/25 at 11:05 am
Posted on 5/23/25 at 11:05 am
The premise of this post is not that Billy Cannon doesn’t deserve to have his number retired. The premise is that retiring numbers is a retarded practice in the first place.
No player should have his number retired. I can understand retiring the jersey and hanging it in the stadium to honor a player, but preventing future players from wearing the number is just stupid and totally unnecessary.
I for one would love to see future RBs, WRs, and DBs wear the number 20.
Also we need to stop preventing players from wearing either #9 or #5. That’s retarded too.
No player should have his number retired. I can understand retiring the jersey and hanging it in the stadium to honor a player, but preventing future players from wearing the number is just stupid and totally unnecessary.
I for one would love to see future RBs, WRs, and DBs wear the number 20.
Also we need to stop preventing players from wearing either #9 or #5. That’s retarded too.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 11:06 am to cbree88
It honestly doesn't bother me I don't really give a shite but glad to see that you are losing sleep at night over numbers in college football
Posted on 5/23/25 at 11:08 am to poncho villa
* Under a provision of the LSU jersey retirement bylaws established Jan. 1, 2007, the retirement of an athlete’s jersey in a particular sport does not preclude a current student-athlete in that sport from wearing the jersey number in that or any other sport, subject to the discretion of the head coach. This provision applies only to jerseys retired after January 1, 2007. The numbers worn by Maravich, Pettit, O’Neal, Cannon and Bertman may never again be worn by future student-athletes in their respective sports.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 11:15 am to nicholastiger
quote:
* Under a provision of the LSU jersey retirement bylaws established Jan. 1, 2007, the retirement of an athlete’s jersey in a particular sport does not preclude a current student-athlete in that sport from wearing the jersey number in that or any other sport, subject to the discretion of the head coach. This provision applies only to jerseys retired after January 1, 2007
That's some highfalutin verbiage to display jersey number retirement control.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 11:24 am to cbree88
Numbers shouldn't be retired
Only jerseys
5, 9, and 20 are too clean to just never be worn again.
Only jerseys
5, 9, and 20 are too clean to just never be worn again.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 11:30 am to LSUdude247
Of all things to waste time worrying about re LSU sports, retiring players' numbers don't even make my top 100 list.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 11:34 am to cbree88
Who cares!?
It's baseball season! Game Day!
It's baseball season! Game Day!
Posted on 5/23/25 at 11:43 am to cbree88
quote:
I for one would love to see future RBs, WRs, and DBs wear the number 20.
Also we need to stop preventing players from wearing either #9 or #5. That’s retarded too.
If a Heisman is the standard we aren't going to run out of numbers.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 2:39 pm to cbree88
Have a downvote for being an idiot.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 2:40 pm to Tiger1988
Couldn’t have said it better myself
Posted on 5/23/25 at 3:15 pm to Tiger1988
quote:
Have a downvote for being an idiot.
Have a downvote for being a TigerBait2008 alter.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 3:36 pm to cbree88
If any number deserves retirement it is someone who: 1. Won a Heisman, and 2. Also won a national championship. Cannon and Burrow meet that category. I’m ok if nobody ever wears #20 and #9 again.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 4:23 pm to cbree88
quote:
I can understand retiring the jersey and hanging it in the stadium to honor a player, but preventing future players from wearing the number is just stupid and totally unnecessary.
It’s up to the coach’s discretion & nobody gives a frick what cbree88 thinks about it.
Football Players can still wear #37, #21, & #4.
Winning the Heisman trophy seems like an adequate requirement to never let the jersey be worn again
This post was edited on 5/23/25 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 5/23/25 at 4:38 pm to cbree88
quote:
Have a downvote for being a TigerBait2008 alter.
Pretty sure I don’t like that poster myself. So you would be wrong.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 4:44 pm to cbree88
Honestly it is cooler to think there won’t be another 20, 9, 5 than oh yep there Joe Smith #20 our 7th string CB
This post was edited on 5/23/25 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 5/23/25 at 4:46 pm to LSUdude247
quote:
Also we need to stop preventing players from wearing either #9 or #5.
quote:
5, 9, and 20 are too clean to just never be worn again.
Everyone knows 20 and 9. I didn't even know who 5 was until I looked it up.
This post was edited on 5/23/25 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 5/23/25 at 6:31 pm to The Boat
quote:
I didn't even know who 5 was until I looked it up.
You serious, Clark?
Posted on 5/23/25 at 6:38 pm to cbree88
Another cbree classic...
Dumbass
Dumbass
Popular
Back to top
