Started By
Message
locked post

Hamas Savagery vs. American Savagery

Posted on 4/9/25 at 8:57 am
Posted by PQuin
Member since Jul 2020
130 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 8:57 am
We’ve been conditioned to think of Hamas and other terrorist groups as almost less than human, savage animals with little regard for human life. While this is obviously true in many cases, I'm curious to hear why leveling an apartment building to kill one person is any better than the actions of Hamas or any other group. It was pretty wild to see the group chat sending fist-bump emojis after killing around 50 people, with most of the casualties being women and children.

Can anyone argue that this shows more regard for human life than the actions of Hamas or other terrorist groups? To add to this, the bombing has a 0% chance of reducing the attacks on shipping lanes and a 100% chance of creating more terrorists. I realize that this is how things have been done for decades, much to the benefit of the MIC. Conveniently, fighting wars in this way is a perpetual profit machine. Why would they ever bring this to an end?
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10077 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:01 am to
It's also weird that the mere concern for children in a war zone is enough for some to call for a federal investigation.

Posted by OGtigerfan87
North La
Member since Feb 2019
3872 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:01 am to
And here we are fellow posters, full on white knighting for Islamic terrorist. Who could have seen this coming lol
This post was edited on 4/9/25 at 9:02 am
Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
13193 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:07 am to
53 postings in 5 years and your coming in hotter than a kamikaze?

Alter for sure…
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
12622 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:07 am to
quote:

PQuin


quote:

Number of Posts:53 Registered on:7/19/2020


Fifty posts in five years and this is the best you can come up with?!
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
34122 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:08 am to
quote:

I'm curious to hear why leveling an apartment building to kill one person is any better than the actions of Hamas or any other group



Someone just listened to Dave Smith on JRE
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
12622 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:08 am to
quote:

BarberitosDawg


Great minds!
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10077 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:08 am to
I don't see any white knighting. We all agree that terrorists should be shown no mercy.

In killing terrorists, what's an acceptable ratio for terrorist to children killed? Is it acceptable to kill 2 children per terrorist? 10 children per terrorist?
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66986 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:11 am to
Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
5719 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:12 am to
These “libertarians” want us to make nothing, have no borders, and not fight terrorists

Then they have the balls to say we are the leftists

They need to stop listening to Imagine, the world isn’t kumbaya
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
4139 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:12 am to
Dropping atomic bombs in Japan killed over 200k, mostly civilians.

Justification was that it prevented US casualties and ended the war.

Taking out leadership weakens the organization presumably in an effort to bring the war to an end. Unfortunately collateral damage occurs.
This post was edited on 4/9/25 at 9:16 am
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
74889 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:13 am to
Very deep questions. I think you should travel to Yemen and Gaza for the answers you seek.
Posted by Burt Reynolds
Monterey, CA
Member since Jul 2008
24214 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:13 am to
quote:

We’ve been conditioned to think of Hamas and other terrorist groups as almost less than human, savage animals with little regard for human life. While this is obviously true in many cases, I'm curious to hear why leveling an apartment building to kill one person is any better than the actions of Hamas or any other group. It was pretty wild to see the group chat sending fist-bump emojis after killing around 50 people, with most of the casualties being women and children. Can anyone argue that this shows more regard for human life than the actions of Hamas or other terrorist groups? To add to this, the bombing has a 0% chance of reducing the attacks on shipping lanes and a 100% chance of creating more terrorists. I realize that this is how things have been done for decades, much to the benefit of the MIC. Conveniently, fighting wars in this way is a perpetual profit machine. Why would they ever bring this to an end?


Noticing this kind of stuff is antisemitic and will be punishable with jail time one day
Posted by ChanceOfRainIsNever
Far from Louisiana
Member since Oct 2016
2815 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:13 am to
What was the acceptable ratio when we bombed Hamburg, Berlin or Dresden? What about when we firebombed Tokyo? No one wants to see children die, at all, but in war things like that happen. Also it’s come out recently that, surprise surprise, the Palestinians greatly exaggerated the number of children killed
Posted by thetempleowl
dallas, tx
Member since Jul 2008
15964 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:15 am to
This is a moronic tale.

If we try to kill a savage and kill a number of innocents which usually are willingly shielding the savage, we celebrate getting the savage, not the killing of innocents.

However the savage celebrates the killing of innocents without a reason. They just celebrate killing people.

Major difference.
Posted by PeleofAnalytics
Member since Jun 2021
5034 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:16 am to
Ahhh the Americans and their famous baby coffin show and parade. Oh wait....




Why is a dog smart enough to know the difference of when you are doing something and unintentionally kick them and when you are intentionally kicking them.

Hamas targeted babies. They saw the baby. Had the choice of killing/kidnapping and then deciding "yes, we kill/kidnap this baby". And then paraded the baby's coffin around when returning the body.

You have issues grasping that the US is not seeing a baby and saying "let's kill it"?

You see no difference?


This post was edited on 4/9/25 at 9:21 am
Posted by LARancher1991
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2015
2070 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:16 am to
Hard not to kill women and children when they are being used as human shields. There is your answer they are sub humans because they use schools, hospitals, and homes as shields for themselves and weapons.
Posted by PQuin
Member since Jul 2020
130 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:18 am to
quote:

53 postings in 5 years and your coming in hotter than a kamikaze? Alter for sure…


The obsession with post count is so funny to me. Do yall really care enough what strangers think of your anonymous account to bother making an alter? Sorry I’m not retired or working in a cubicle all day.

Anything to avoid making an actual argument, I guess.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10077 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:18 am to
I'm against any military action outside of that authorized by the Constitution (call me crazy), but there are certainly more surgical ways of dealing with individual terrorists than flattening an apartment building.
Posted by LARancher1991
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2015
2070 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:20 am to
That's war. It used to be a lot worse. Used to they would not only wipe out the enemy but also any relative or family that may one day fight also. Of course you can't do that these days.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram