Started By
Message

US oil producers face new growth challenges in top oilfield (Permian)

Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:14 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
24780 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:14 am
quote:

NEW YORK/HOUSTON, March 27 (Reuters) - U.S. oil producers are grappling with geological limits to production growth as the country's top oilfield ages and produces more water and gas and less oil - and may be nearing peak output.

The Permian basin was the centerpiece of the shale revolution that began nearly two decades ago and spurred the U.S. to become the world's top oil producer, stealing market share from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and other top producers.


quote:

The Permian is pumping 6.5 million barrels per day (bpd), a record level and nearly half the all-time high 13.5 million bpd of crude that the U.S. produced in December.


quote:

Relentless drilling to reach record production has exhausted the core of the Permian's two largest sub-basins: nearly two-thirds of the Midland formation's core has been drilled, and slightly more than half in the Delaware formation, according to data from analytics software company Novi Labs.

"We've never been in a position before where we were on the back-half of the inventory story of a burning basin," Novi Labs head of research Brandon Myers said.


quote:

"We think that between 2027 and 2030 it's likely that the U.S. will see peak production, and after that some decline," Occidental CEO Vicki Hollub said earlier this month at an industry conference in Houston.

Harold Hamm, founder of shale producer Continental Resources and a key figure in the U.S. shale boom, agrees. He said at the same conference that U.S. oil production is already beginning to plateau.

For now, output is still rising.


quote:

Producers are dealing with rising levels of water and gas per barrel produced, which is slowing growth and driving up costs.

In the past decade, gas output in the Permian has increased eight-fold, while crude production rose six-fold, according to a review by the U.S. Energy Information Administration.


quote:

Breakevens to drill a new well in the Permian averaged $65 a barrel in 2024, up $4 on the year, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

Less desirable acreage breakevens can hit $96, per Novi Labs, some $26 above where a barrel of crude is trading.


quote:

Even as producers face higher gas and water output, the sheer volume of oil they can pump justifies production, said Clint Barnette, director of geology at Indigo Energy Advisors, a unit of advisory firm Efficient Markets.

"It's how the Delaware basin stays economic even though those wells produce six to seven times the amount of water as they do oil," he said, referring to the Permian's second biggest sub-basin.

"I would never bet against the Permian," Barnette said.


LINK /
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
12376 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:16 am to
Vellly interesting
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 6:17 am
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
30656 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:24 am to
quote:

"We think that between 2027 and 2030 it's likely that the U.S. will see peak production, and after that some decline,"


I thought we saw "peak" production already?
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
39760 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:50 am to
quote:

NEW YORK/HOUSTON, March 27 (Reuters) - U.S. oil producers are grappling with geological limits to production growth as the country's top oilfield ages and produces more water and gas and less oil - and may be nearing peak output


I see plenty of spots where they can fit more wells.

Posted by TygerDurden
Member since Sep 2009
1915 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:01 am to
quote:

We think that between 2027 and 2030 it's likely that the U.S. will see peak production, and after that some decline," Occidental CEO Vicki Hollub said earlier this month at an industry conference in Houston.


As someone that grew up in the late 60’s and thru the 70’s and 80’s I have seriously lost count of the number of so called experts that have spouted this exact line and yet here we are 50 years later still figuring out how to just keep finding it and pulling it from the ground. In the early 2000’s there was a website something like “life after the oil crash” devoted entirely what was supposed to have happened by now to the world when we reached peak oil supply. And again here we are 25 years after the genesis point of that apocalyptic web site still moving along. Point is you just can’t trust these experts and whatever ulterior motives or underlying politics they are beholden to. Case in point and look it up…in the 70’s the climate “experts” were espousing that we were entering another ice age and 30 years later nope global warming is the enemy now. In the end it is nothing more than fear mongering for more political power and wealth accumulation.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
76340 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:04 am to
quote:

thought we saw "peak" production already?


Yeah, back in the 1970s.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
86402 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:05 am to
quote:

it's likely that the U.S. will see peak production


Famous last words which have been echoed for 2 decades.

Our technology advances will help squeeze more oil out of places otherwise thought to be deadzones.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
32788 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:06 am to
They will be right.....one day.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
14162 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:09 am to
New York/Houston

Interesting.
Posted by SM6
Georgia
Member since Jul 2008
8864 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:10 am to
Dumb question, but the water produced is that from the underground aquifer, correct? Is there a way to recover that water for human consumption or is it just a waste byproduct?
Posted by Capt ST
High Plains
Member since Aug 2011
13322 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:18 am to
I hear lots of talk out here on finding a way to utilize the water produced.
Posted by BamaChemE
Midland, TX
Member since Feb 2012
7354 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:28 am to
Produced water is nasty as frick. It’s not from an aquifer.

We are trying to find ways to at least get it to EPA standards for surface disposal, which could make the area a bit more green.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
24780 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:31 am to
quote:

I see plenty of spots where they can fit more wells.


Yeah, but since you have to work around the Dollar General at that intersection, those locations are the ones that need the $96 break even.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85077 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:31 am to
quote:

We are trying to find ways to at least get it to EPA standards for surface disposal


that seems cost prohibitive
Posted by Tigerfan1274
Member since May 2019
4014 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:35 am to
quote:

Dumb question, but the water produced is that from the underground aquifer, correct? Is there a way to recover that water for human consumption or is it just a waste byproduct?


Actually not a dumb question at all. Produced water comes from the formation where the oil and gas is extracted. It usually is high in chlorides/salt, hydrocarbons, and some metals. It is considered an exempt waste under RCRA and is cheaper to dispose of (via injection well) than most wastes. I think there has been efforts to recycle this water, but it is expensive and a good portion of the stream is reject water, meaning it has to be disposed of any way. You may be able to use 30% to 50% of what you are trying to recycle or purify. Long story short, it's often cheaper to dispose of it than to purify it and make it suitable to consumption.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
24780 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:36 am to
quote:

that seems cost prohibitive


Yeah…but so is shutting in production because the Texas RRC and NMOCD say no new disposals because of earthquakes and cracks in the ground forming where that nasty water returns back to the surface.

So industry is fishing for every viable solution.
Posted by BamaChemE
Midland, TX
Member since Feb 2012
7354 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:36 am to
quote:

that seems cost prohibitive


Currently, yeah, very much so, but with available pore space filling up and pressure concerns, the ambiguous “they” are saying that within 5 years water disposal is going to have to be shipped out of the Permian, which super inflates disposal costs making that which is currently cost prohibitive economically competitive.
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36937 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:37 am to
quote:

and may be nearing peak output.


Ah, so we’re going back to the “peak oil” narrative?
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
11903 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:37 am to
A company is putting together a plant which "free" natural gas to clean up the produced water and sell it. Also, recovering some of the salts from it to sell.

Yes, natural gas is virtually free at the wellhead in the Permian.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
24780 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 7:41 am to
quote:

so we’re going back to the “peak oil” narrative?


I’m not a geologist or reservoir engineer; however, just my personal unprofessional opinion, I believe we still have lots and lots of untapped oil onshore U.S. lands. Even in the Permian, where if industry was motivated, it could keep growing production. However, there is a “peak” at price points as well.

At $65/bbl, we very well may be tapping out growth in the Permian. But at $165/bbl, you’d see all sort of new secondary recovery projects get funded to squeeze many more barrels out of there.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram