- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Fani Willis Ordered to Pay $54K For ‘Intentionally’ Violating Open Records Laws
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:32 pm
LINK
quote:
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis was ordered to pay $54,000 in attorneys’ fees for ‘intentionally’ violating open records laws in her bogus RICO case against Trump.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Rachel Krause ordered Fani Willis to pay legal fees for failing to provide requested records to the plaintiff’s lawyer, Ashleigh Merchant.
The judge said Fani Willis failed to provide records related to Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor hired to hunt down Trump.
16
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:33 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
That’s one floorboard.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:34 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
That's chump change. She needs to ask Stacy Abrams for a handout.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:35 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Does she personally pay or are the taxpayers of Fulton on the hook?
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:35 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Lol, here is another one sfp defended.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:36 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Fani Willis was ordered to pay $54,000
Does that mean Georgia taxpayers will be paying that fine??
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:36 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
$54,000
I hope she’s got that much in her mattress. Otherwise, that’s a buttload of $40 transactions at the CVS.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:36 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Lol, here is another one sfp defended.
Perfect example of not understanding a legal argument (especially about procedure or jurisdiction) and an argument about personal preference of the underlying merits.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:37 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Fani Willis getting hit with a $54K fine is a clear sign she messed up without a doubt.
When government officials ignore open recoreds requests, they should be held accountable to the fullest extent in my view.
If she intentionally withheld info, that’s a serious problem. This case was already shady, and this just another example of her frickery.
I have no problem with people like this getting hit hard regardless of anyone's politics.
When government officials ignore open recoreds requests, they should be held accountable to the fullest extent in my view.
If she intentionally withheld info, that’s a serious problem. This case was already shady, and this just another example of her frickery.
I have no problem with people like this getting hit hard regardless of anyone's politics.
This post was edited on 3/17/25 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:38 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Yard sale on Mitchell Street tomorrow!
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:39 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
At least USAID won’t find this.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:43 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
This may or may not be her invoice to USAID to recoup her $54k
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:44 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
That’s it? What a joke
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:54 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Shouldn't be a problem. I hear all black women keep tens of thousands in cash in their closets.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 5:02 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I don't want to see fines, I want to see jail time. Even if it is only a little.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 5:07 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Court orders only apply to Republicans.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 5:10 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
She needs to be charged with violating Trump's civil and constitutional rights under the false color of law among other things.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 5:10 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Lol, here is another one sfp defended.
Yeah, he was deep up her arse.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 5:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
But your legal arguments always side with the other side. Always
Posted on 3/17/25 at 5:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Perfect example of not understanding a legal argument (especially about procedure or jurisdiction) and an argument about personal preference of the underlying merits
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Even when you're proven wrong, you're still a pompous POS. Take your "L," fool.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News