Started By
Message

Purpose of pharma ads..........didn't know.......

Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:27 pm
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
23496 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:27 pm
Ex-pharma consultant turned industry critic @calleymeans
went viral when he told Tucker Carlson that the true goal of pharma ads on TV is not to sell drugs but to buy off the news media.


This makes perfect sense. I've never understood all their adverts, because the docs decide what prescription medicine you take not you (in general). This statement that the pharm companies just want the media in bed with them so the media would not have negative news stories about them rings true to me. Thats why President Trump was talking about outlawing pharm commercials last week.

Just when I thought I had everything figured out. Wish yall would have told me this earlier.
Posted by Gee Grenouille
Bogalusa
Member since Jul 2018
6880 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:31 pm to
Well it’s been discussed here before so they did try to tell you.
Posted by Laugh More
Member since Jan 2022
2697 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:31 pm to
This became obvious to me during Covid when every mainstream media outlet was sponsored by Pfizer for a drug/vaccine that was free.
Posted by joe8 7
Thibodaux, LA
Member since Nov 2005
715 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:33 pm to
No doubt it was part of a money laundering scheme involving our tax dollars.
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
18620 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:34 pm to
Will the Natove American Senator from Massachusetts and AOC lead a protest in favor of big pharma commercials?
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
23496 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:34 pm to
Ok, I wasn't listening. I admit I usually dont read pharma, big pharma posts.
It really makes sense.
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:35 pm to
Yep. They are buying silence.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
87280 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:37 pm to
Did these commercials exist pre-Covid?

I know Eli Lilly had tons of ads way back when
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
23496 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:38 pm to
Yes , they did.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

Pharmaceutical companies were first allowed to advertise directly to consumers (DTC advertising) on TV in the United States in 1985, following guidance from the FDA (Food and Drug Administration). However, strict regulations initially required extensive medical disclaimers, making TV ads impractical.

The major change came in 1997, when the FDA relaxed regulations, allowing drug companies to advertise without listing every side effect, as long as they directed viewers to further information (e.g., a website or toll-free number).


When did everyone start getting fat in the US?

There you go.
Posted by Rip N Lip
Zambodia
Member since Jul 2019
6107 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:40 pm to
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
43334 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:41 pm to
Everyone with a book deal is getting paid off. That includes every clown on Fox News.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
23496 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:41 pm to
Dang
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19559 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

Thats why President Trump was talking about outlawing pharm commercials



Do it please

MSM will disappear with quickness
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
87280 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:52 pm to
Good find Bucky
Posted by Big Jim Slade
Member since Oct 2016
5978 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:53 pm to
Likely true. But they also want to create a marketing pull campaign- ingrain the drug name and the purpose in the public’s mind to the point where the patients come in asking their doctor for the magic pill they saw on TV by name.
Posted by WestSideTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
4516 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:59 pm to
All the HIV medicine ads aren’t doing them any favors if the goal is to continue getting them aired. They are really pushing the envelope with what they put on the screen and for the programming slots they are run during. I think there is some SJW motivation there as well as what you mention.

Posted by wallowinit
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2006
16127 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:00 pm to
Yea that’s pretty automatic when you think about it
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
10062 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:00 pm to
As bad as product placement can be in news, the 1950’s news was a pinnacle of product placement where oil companies and tobacco companies had a huge stroke in what was in the news. I can remember an old interview with Alec Gifford talking about the early days of WDSU and he being the Esso Report where every story had to be told a certain way and had to have dramatic music like a newsreel you would see at a theater.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
59763 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

the true goal of pharma ads on TV is not to sell drugs but to buy off the news media.




...and social engineering.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram