Started By
Message

Rewatching 1883

Posted on 2/9/25 at 8:52 pm
Posted by Cool Hand Luke
Member since Oct 2008
1943 posts
Posted on 2/9/25 at 8:52 pm
We decided to rewatch 1883. This is really a good western. Although I wish there could have been more episodes, it probably ended when it should have.
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
30931 posts
Posted on 2/10/25 at 6:45 am to
it was well done. 1923 was great as well and Season 2 comes out Feb 23rd
Posted by Cool Hand Luke
Member since Oct 2008
1943 posts
Posted on 2/10/25 at 7:05 am to
Looking forward to 1923 season 2. Will need to refresh my memory by watching season 1 again.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35236 posts
Posted on 2/10/25 at 7:14 am to
1883 was the first Yellowstone that I watched. I wasn’t too thrilled with it. The first episode was a bit over the top, but I liked it so I stuck it out.

Once it eased into the wagon train from hell motif, I was just finishing to finish.

Sam Elliot was supposed to be some Beth like character where he had his own brand of justice but looked after folks also. He was pretty useless as a wagon train boss. And literally killed families who somehow crossed him.

I was impressed with Faith and Tim. They really carried the show in places.

Now I’m on to my third Taylor Sheridan series with Tulsa King. It doesn’t seem to take itself as seriously as Yellowstone stuff.
This post was edited on 2/10/25 at 7:15 am
Posted by Sus-Scrofa
Member since Feb 2013
9742 posts
Posted on 2/10/25 at 7:49 am to
Shame they decided to end it in one episode rather than a second season.
Posted by LSUbub12
South Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
273 posts
Posted on 2/10/25 at 9:32 am to
I overall enjoyed 1883 on my initial watch. Need to do a rewatch.
I’m halfway through my rewatch of 1923 and I like it even better than my first go round!

My major question about 1883 is why didn’t they take a train?
The railroads crisscrossed most of the country by then.
Posted by Cool Hand Luke
Member since Oct 2008
1943 posts
Posted on 2/10/25 at 9:46 am to
I think they said they couldn't afford to move horses, and belongings by train.
Posted by markthetiger
alexandria
Member since Aug 2005
1069 posts
Posted on 2/10/25 at 10:36 am to
Was that the series that some dude paid $50 for a glass mirror and $500 for a wagon "fully furnished with goods" for the trip out west? The amount of goods $500 dollars would have purchased in 1883 would not possibly fit in a covered wagon...and who would pay $2,000 ($50 in 1883) for a hand held mirror? Also, you are out on the plains and can see for miles and miles. You can't avoid a tornado?
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 2/10/25 at 3:31 pm to
Chief Raging Cock going balls deep and "marrying" the daughter a week or two after her first man being killed was ridiculous.

Pretty good show overall, but that and Sam Elliott being a whiney, inept prima donna took away from it.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
30706 posts
Posted on 2/10/25 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Chief Raging Cock going balls deep and "marrying" the daughter a week or two after her first man being killed was ridiculous.

Pretty good show overall, but that and Sam Elliott being a whiney, inept prima donna took away from it.


i didn't dislike it a ton, but i have no desire to go back and revisit it. the lead actress was annoyingly impetuous to where Tim McGraw would have been wise to backhand her a few times, given the era.

i'd rather watch 1923 or American Primeval again.
Posted by Demonbengal
Ruston
Member since May 2015
3462 posts
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:00 pm to
I thought McGraw and Faith Hill were better than I expected. The daughters accent was rough. I enjoyed the cameos from Sheridan, Billy Bob,and Tom Hanks. No way McGraws character was cool with her running off with an Indian. No way Faith Hills character would’ve been so passive about her hooking up with a cow poke.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
30706 posts
Posted on 2/10/25 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

No way McGraws character was cool with her running off with an Indian. No way Faith Hills character would’ve been so passive about her hooking up with a cow poke.


I repeat…

quote:

the lead actress was annoyingly impetuous to where Tim McGraw would have been wise to backhand her a few times, given the era.



He was way too “she’s wild and I can’t control her…”
Posted by CobraCommander83
Member since Feb 2017
11958 posts
Posted on 2/11/25 at 7:08 am to
I enjoyed 1883. Did it have moments where you thought parts of the writing was ridiculous? Yes but it was still good overall. I wished they would have done a season 2 showing the Duttons establishing the Yellowstone. In a way bridge that gap between 1883 and 1923.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
25784 posts
Posted on 2/11/25 at 7:19 am to
I just watched them both (1883 and 1923) back to back after finished Yellowstone from the beginning. I expected to like 1923 more, but I definitely enjoyed 1883 more.
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
71198 posts
Posted on 2/11/25 at 7:23 am to
quote:

I wished they would have done a season 2 showing the Duttons establishing the Yellowstone. In a way bridge that gap between 1883 and 1923.


same here. would like to know what happened when they showed the scene at the house where i'm guessing it was Faith who screamed like someone died. I guess that's how Jacob took over running the ranch but, a lot was left unsaid.
Posted by UnitedFruitCompany
Bay Area
Member since Nov 2018
3716 posts
Posted on 2/11/25 at 8:04 am to
quote:

Sam Elliot was supposed to be some Beth like character where he had his own brand of justice but looked after folks also. He was pretty useless as a wagon train boss. And literally killed families who somehow crossed him.



I liked 1883 and I also hated how so many on the train died. Western Expansion is an area of American History I never spent much time so it makes me wonder if it was pretty common to lose like 60% of your train on the way out west. Just seems high to me. Anyone have any info on that?
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
17956 posts
Posted on 2/11/25 at 8:09 am to
quote:

I liked 1883 and I also hated how so many on the train died. Western Expansion is an area of American History I never spent much time so it makes me wonder if it was pretty common to lose like 60% of your train on the way out west. Just seems high to me. Anyone have any info on that?


Speaking as a veteran of the Oregon Trail when it was on a floppy disk, they would typically lose half the train to dysentery or drown fording a river.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
25784 posts
Posted on 2/11/25 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Estimates of the number of people who died on the Oregon Trail range from 20,000 to 65,000. This is about 1 in 10 emigrants who set out on the trail.
Posted by Conman23
Erzberg Rodeo
Member since Mar 2021
2290 posts
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:04 am to
quote:

No way McGraws character was cool with her running off with an Indian

I disagree. McGraw is an Indian Outlaw.
This post was edited on 2/11/25 at 10:06 am
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
71198 posts
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:06 am to
quote:

McGraw is an Indian Outlaw.


Half Cherokee and Choctaw.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram