- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
A bill to repeal the National Firearms Act of 1934 has been sent to the 118th Congress
Posted on 1/14/25 at 12:09 am
Posted on 1/14/25 at 12:09 am
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/450/text
quote:
118th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 450
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the National Firearms Act.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 24, 2023
Mr. Burlison (for himself, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Biggs, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Ogles, and Mr. Gosar) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the National Firearms Act.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. Short title.
This Act may be cited as the “Repeal the NFA Act”.
SEC. 2. Repeal of National Firearms Act.
Chapter 53 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the item relating to such chapter in the table of chapters for subtitle E, are hereby repealed.
4
Posted on 1/14/25 at 2:16 am to finchmeister08
this was two years ago, current congress is the 119th
This post was edited on 1/14/25 at 2:19 am
Posted on 1/14/25 at 5:44 am to CSATiger
it's been reintroduced by the same guy that wrote the one in the OP.
bunch of guntubers were talking about it last night.
quote:
it hasn't been printed, yet.
bunch of guntubers were talking about it last night.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 7:44 am to finchmeister08
Even if they can get short barrel rifles/ shotguns and suppressors removed it would be a huge win. I’m ok with full auto being regulated though I think we should be able to buy and register new production and not be limited to pre 1987 date of manufacture
Posted on 1/14/25 at 7:47 am to bayoudude
quote:
I’m ok with full auto being regulated
that's not how this works
Posted on 1/14/25 at 8:17 am to finchmeister08
My guess is that this is too big a bite for Congress to swallow...
Maybe chipping away provision by provision as an alternative or even parallel effort...
Maybe chipping away provision by provision as an alternative or even parallel effort...
Posted on 1/14/25 at 8:26 am to TigersnJeeps
That is my thought process as well. Use the gun grabber tactic of death by a thousand cuts. If you can get just some of it repealed it’s a step in the right direction.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 8:47 am to TigersnJeeps
quote:
My guess is that this is too big a bite for Congress to swallow...
Has the government ever willfully given up a revenue stream? Unless the bill still includes a $200 tax in the fine print and just eliminates the approval process, I’ll hold my breath.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 9:19 am to TheDrunkenTigah
they'd want to increase the stamp cost most definitely to account for inflation.
$200 in June of 1934 = $4,708.85 in November of 2024
$200 in June of 1934 = $4,708.85 in November of 2024
Posted on 1/14/25 at 9:25 am to finchmeister08
As long as we only repeal and don't add I am fine. If we somehow get in a weird spot where auto is allowed, but tax stamps are like 2k for everything, I will be annoyed.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 1:13 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
quote:
Has the government ever willfully given up a revenue stream?
The revenue generated from every suppressor in the wild is something like $300 million. We spent that as I typed this post, but you're not wrong on your skepticism. Hopefully the amount will be mentioned.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 1:22 pm to GRTiger
I also want all the money I spent on stamps given back to me.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 1:52 pm to jdavid1
quote:
I also want all the money I spent on stamps given back to me.
Posted on 1/15/25 at 5:45 am to GRTiger
quote:
I also want all the money I spent on stamps given back to me.
Posted on 1/15/25 at 1:41 pm to Stateguy
absolutely no way the government actually makes money on the stamp process.
Posted on 1/15/25 at 1:49 pm to bayoudude
quote:
I’m ok with full auto being regulated though I think we should be able to buy and register new production and not be limited to pre 1987 date of manufacture
Pre 1987 H&K transferable MP5 50,000.00
Repeal NFA
New production MP5 from H&K 49,999.99
Posted on 1/15/25 at 1:56 pm to finchmeister08
quote:
they'd want to increase the stamp cost most definitely to account for inflation
I’m kind of surprised they haven’t tried to sneak a NFA tax increase in some other bill already. I mean a $200 tax was a big barrier for a lot of folks in the 1934, which was the intent.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News