- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

My hypothesis for next season
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:59 pm
It looks like we have brought Van Burden in to not sit on the bench, but actually play this coming season. I expect these 3 dynamics out of him.
1: Packages in the offense to do more with our weapons. Defenses have to account. We have some of the fastest guys in the nation this year. No way BK/sloan can afford to play basic ball again.
2: obviously insurance policy if Nuss goes down.
3: If Nuss is having an off game or we need a change of energy , we have someone to come in for him. We are not in the playoffs because he didn’t use his legs in the USC, Florida, and A&M games.
I really like the pick up.
1: Packages in the offense to do more with our weapons. Defenses have to account. We have some of the fastest guys in the nation this year. No way BK/sloan can afford to play basic ball again.
2: obviously insurance policy if Nuss goes down.
3: If Nuss is having an off game or we need a change of energy , we have someone to come in for him. We are not in the playoffs because he didn’t use his legs in the USC, Florida, and A&M games.
I really like the pick up.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:04 pm to tigersav
I seriously doubt you see him play much outside of a Nuss injury.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:07 pm to tigersav
I like what you are thinking, but I’ll have to see it to believe it.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:07 pm to tigersav
quote:
Packages in the offense to do more with our weapons. Defenses have to account.
How does he help accomplish this?
quote:
We are not in the playoffs because he didn’t use his legs in the USC, Florida, and A&M games.
I don’t think this is true, and even if it is, I’m not sure that he solves that.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:11 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
I seriously doubt you see him play much outside of a Nuss injury.
I think you’re wrong. Our biggest offensive weakness this year was red zone offense. Van Buren will have RZ packages for him. Puts the D at a disadvantage having to switch defense mindset in the middle of a series.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:19 pm to lsufan1971
quote:
Van Buren will have RZ packages for him.
Why would we have RZ packages for him? Do you think he has a different skill set than Nussmeier? Are you under the impression Van Buren is a dual threat QB? He had -12 yds rushing this season.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:20 pm to tigersav
I’ll bet you he barely plays at all unless Nuss gets hurt.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:22 pm to lsufan1971
Sounds like typical tiger droppings wish casting. You’re talking about Brian Kelly here, he’s not going to have a “special package” quarterback. This hypothesis is completely ridiculous.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:22 pm to lsufan1971
quote:
I think you’re wrong. Our biggest offensive weakness this year was red zone offense. Van Buren will have RZ packages for him.
Was Van Buren elite in the red zone last year or something?
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:30 pm to tigersav
Typical tiger rant poster. Sees black quarterback and assumes he’s dual threat.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:36 pm to HighRoller
quote:
Typical tiger rant poster. Sees black quarterback and assumes he’s dual threat.
This.
Van Buren is basically a lower ranked, less polished version of Nuss.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:59 pm to tigersav
quote:
Van Burden in to not sit on the bench, but actually play this coming season.
That's exactly what we brought him here to do. His time is 2026.
quote:
My hypothesis for next season
Is stupid
Posted on 12/15/24 at 3:08 pm to tigersav
quote:
It looks like we have brought Van Burden in to not sit on the bench, but actually play this coming season.
lol what are you basing this off of?
Posted on 12/15/24 at 3:46 pm to tigersav
quote:
It looks like we have brought Van Burden in to not sit on the bench, but actually play this coming season.
Les once said if you have a Ferrari you dont tinker with the engine…
I really expect him to be the 26-27 guy. Bring in one of the 27 stud QBs and prep em up for 28-29.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 3:50 pm to tigersav
quote:He ain't heavy.
It looks like we have brought Van Burden
He's my backup QB.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 3:57 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
agreed
Still waiting for a few more different plays anywhere on the field.
VB will run the same plays Nuss runs. Nothing changes with BK's offense.
We should all be aware of that by now.
Still waiting for a few more different plays anywhere on the field.
VB will run the same plays Nuss runs. Nothing changes with BK's offense.
We should all be aware of that by now.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 6:50 pm to QB
quote:
VB will run the same plays Nuss runs.
Well duh, he's the same type of quarterback
Posted on 12/15/24 at 10:35 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:Not sure what the Kelly comment was about, he's had packages for running quarterbacks a good bit throughout his career, including his last year at Notre Dame.
Sounds like typical tiger droppings wish casting. You’re talking about Brian Kelly here, he’s not going to have a “special package” quarterback. This hypothesis is completely ridiculous.
Posted on 12/16/24 at 1:49 am to tigersav
If he’s the same type of QB as nuss I’m good with that but why is everyone jumping for joy? He’s not gonna turn out like j Daniels apparently
Popular
Back to top

10








