- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Which is the lesser evil? The transfer portal or NIL?
Posted on 12/8/24 at 10:49 am
Posted on 12/8/24 at 10:49 am
We can all agree CFB is complete chaos.
Transfers have immediate eligibility and billionaires are buying players. I can’t keep up.
You can actually see the results now. There are no dominate college teams this year bc of the comings and goings of rosters imo.
The 12 teams could be great or a waste of time. Maybe Boise, SMU or ASU can make a run.
Transfers have immediate eligibility and billionaires are buying players. I can’t keep up.
You can actually see the results now. There are no dominate college teams this year bc of the comings and goings of rosters imo.
The 12 teams could be great or a waste of time. Maybe Boise, SMU or ASU can make a run.
21
Posted on 12/8/24 at 10:52 am to Mouth
Transfer portal could be controlled more. NCAA can’t stop the kids from making money now so I would have to go with NIL is worse. I do think kids should get paid. But just don’t know how to control it.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 10:54 am to Mouth
quote:
Which is the lesser evil? The transfer portal or NIL?
NIL. Paying players isn't new, but if we could somehow, someway get back to where you had to sit out a year if you transferred, that would mitigate alot of this bullshite.
This post was edited on 12/8/24 at 10:56 am
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:02 am to Mouth
NCAA is scared of losing more ground if it stops the transfer portal or put into place where transfers can’t move within a conference.
If I were the NCAA I would put rules into place that allows for 1 transfer without sitting and the second one you sit. Plus make the rule include no transfers within the conference the first time ie they could transfer back in the second but would have to sit. That would stop a bunch of this shite.
If I were the NCAA I would put rules into place that allows for 1 transfer without sitting and the second one you sit. Plus make the rule include no transfers within the conference the first time ie they could transfer back in the second but would have to sit. That would stop a bunch of this shite.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:03 am to Mouth
Transfer portal. Wouldn’t have as many switching if it wasn’t for NIL
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:05 am to Mouth
The transfer portal went to far because in the past they restricted players movements too much.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:06 am to Mouth
Why cant they bring back burning a year of eligibility for transferring?
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:06 am to Mouth
NIL lesser of two evils, it will right itself over time by basic economics. The portal is the devil.
No team will be able to have quality depth, the days of having a roster of 5 stars waiting their turn is over. Saban clearly saw it and said I’m out like a fat kid in dodgeball, not dealing with this shite.
quote:
There are no dominate college teams this year bc of the comings and goings of rosters imo.
No team will be able to have quality depth, the days of having a roster of 5 stars waiting their turn is over. Saban clearly saw it and said I’m out like a fat kid in dodgeball, not dealing with this shite.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:07 am to Mouth
Neither in and of itself is evil. It is the highly unregulated nature of the two combined that exacerbates things.
I could see them having 1 free transfer and then having to sit out 1 season unless a specific cause is met such as the program shuts down, a head coaching change, and other specific appeals that can be addressed individually (I would set it up using independent arbitrators and have the athletes sign a binding agreement to abide by the ruling as a condition for playing NCAA football). Of course, the grad transfer/imediate eligibility rules would still apply.
I could see them having 1 free transfer and then having to sit out 1 season unless a specific cause is met such as the program shuts down, a head coaching change, and other specific appeals that can be addressed individually (I would set it up using independent arbitrators and have the athletes sign a binding agreement to abide by the ruling as a condition for playing NCAA football). Of course, the grad transfer/imediate eligibility rules would still apply.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:11 am to Mouth
NIL is the worst and needs to be abolished!
The portal needs to be tweaked to have limitations the way transfers used to be.
All of this is ruining college sports, especially football. What a cluster! It’s not even fun anymore.
The portal needs to be tweaked to have limitations the way transfers used to be.
All of this is ruining college sports, especially football. What a cluster! It’s not even fun anymore.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:14 am to Mouth
The problem with all of it is the no-sit change. Every player in the country is a free agent every year, even in the middle of a season. If players had to sit, they would be less likely to transfer.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:15 am to Mouth
NIL. It's regarded that major college athletes couldn't do product endorsements.
The transfer portal is the source of the chaos.
The transfer portal is the source of the chaos.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:16 am to Locoguan0
Exactly and no one is giving NIL money to someone who can’t play immediately. Putting guardrails on the transfer portal would help immensely.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:18 am to Mouth
NIL- Period, no contest.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:29 am to Mouth
portal all day. NIL destroyed the game.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:29 am to Pandy Fackler
quote:
NIL. Paying players isn't new, but if we could somehow, someway get back to where you had to sit out a year if you transferred, that would mitigate alot of this bullshite.
It should be something like a redshirt type thing…if you play in less than 8 (I know redshirt is 4) games then you can transfer no penalty…if you aren’t seeing the field you should be able to better your position. If you’re starting every game you should have some penalty for transferring in conference. If you move up or down in conferences no penalty.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:29 am to Mouth
Portal for sure
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:53 am to Mouth
the elimination of the one-year-sit-out rule has to be part of this conversation
Posted on 12/8/24 at 12:40 pm to Mouth
The NIL is the lesser in my opinion. You will always have players lost to either under the table money or NIL. The portal destroys roster/depth management and program stability. It’s hard to maintain a championship level year in and year out with the portal.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 1:21 pm to Mouth
Very few transfer if not for NIL...or should I say, a lot less transfer.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News