Started By
Message
locked post

NBA radio this morning re Ingram

Posted on 12/6/24 at 8:23 am
Posted by ghost2most
Member since Mar 2012
7737 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 8:23 am
Was interesting that the hosts basically had a similar opinion we do.

It started with them talking about Bradley Beal, and how he's not worth this Max and can't be the second best guy on a contender as evidenced by the Suns 1-7 record without Durant.

They then said that Beal is the posterchild of a cautionary tale for Ingram.

They said Ingram is a No. 3 on a contender and not worth a max. The host suggested Ingram accept reality that he's not getting the max and if he does, it's going to be a team he doesn't want and then he'll get stuck like Lavine.

They talked a bit more about the second apron and how even the commissioner warned these guys that these contracts will be untradeable.

They suggested a contract for Ingram similar to OG Anunoby in the low 40s and in no way should anyone give him a max.

I don't even know if I want to go that high.

Ingram scored 29. I missed most of the third quarter. That must have been when he scored because he was an absolute zero in the 4th.

Iso bullshite, turnovers, terrible shot selection.

Part of that (a huge part) is Willie's horrible crunch time coaching. But part is just Ingram. He's not clutch and is horribly inefficient going iso at the end of games.

We won in spite of him and Willie's shite coaching. Ingram iso, CJ iso, such fricking bullshite.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
25778 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Ingram iso, CJ iso,


Lol CJ won the game for us and was super clutch last night aside from one missed ft.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 8:51 am to
Yeah, but they tried like hell to give it away at the end. Murray even got in on the un-clutch turnover action and that's what he was brought in specifically to address. So I see the OPs frustration. What he's missing though is having 5 legit NBA starters on the floor made this team look so much different than it had been.

I don't know what the answer is, but Addition By Subtraction is not it. I do think the SVG debacle gave us insight into the Zion/Ingram pairing that we should have heeded long ago and broken them up already. Zion looks like he needs a hard arse coach, Ingram couldn't take it though. Coaching is a problem and you probably aren't going to find a good coach that gets the best out of both so you need to pick one.
This post was edited on 12/6/24 at 8:52 am
Posted by ghost2most
Member since Mar 2012
7737 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Lol CJ won the game for us and was super clutch last night aside from one missed ft.



But it was a horrible plan. How often will CJ be able to go 1-on-1 like that against shite defenders like Allen?

How many times does this actually work? Not many and it almost didn't last night too.
Posted by FMtTXtiger
Member since Oct 2018
4955 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 8:59 am to
who signs ingram to the max if he's a FA?

Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
5514 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 9:05 am to
quote:

They said Ingram is a No. 3 on a contender and not worth a max


And a real problem here is Ingram doesn’t have a game suited to being the No. 3 guy. His game just isn’t complimentary to other pieces. Chris Bosh, Kevin Love, Draymond Green, Manu Ginobli all played within their role.

Ingram has a No. 1 player game but a No. 3 player ability.
Posted by N.O. via West-Cal
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
7681 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 9:19 am to
I realize I may take some heat, but I discussed Ingram with someone who works for an NBA front office (not at the top) who said that players like Ingram are the toughest to know what to do with. They’re undeniably good but not good enough to build around to contend for a title, yet the NBA salary structure tends to result in these “third tier stars” getting max deals. It was basically the same evaluation you hear on this board.

By the way, I’m not dumping on BI and enjoyed watching him go pure blue flame hot last night. Just talking ball …
Posted by SFTiger
Maryland
Member since Feb 2007
610 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Ingram scored 29. I missed most of the third quarter. That must have been when he scored because he was an absolute zero in the 4th.

We won in spite of him and Willie's shite coaching.



BI scored 21 in an 8 minute stretch of the 3rd quarter. During that time, we went from being down 6 to being up 9. I'd counter that without that BI 3Qtr heater, we wouldn't have been in a position to win in the 4th.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465697 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 9:48 am to
quote:

They talked a bit more about the second apron and how even the commissioner warned these guys that these contracts will be untradeable.

Julius Randle was just traded as salary fill in this offseason

He and Ingram have the unfortunate timing to be seeking deals that would be formalities under the old system, but are basically the first gen of this class of player in the 2nd apron system.

They are basically canaries in coal mines and the question is how far teams may be overreacting to 2nd apron economics in their valuations. When markets are disrupted, it usually takes time to find an equilibrium and Ingram/Randle are the first test subjects in that journey.

It's unfortunate for them, but at some point they have to face reality or risk being the next Dennis Schroder, Nerlens Noel, Victor Oladipo, etc.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465697 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 9:50 am to
quote:

yet the NBA salary structure tends to result in these “third tier stars” getting max deals.


In the old system, yes.

That's b/c of how "max salaries" depress the wages of actual "max" guys. The barrier for entry into the salary tier went to guys like Ingram.

With the downward pressure still existing for max contracts within the new 2nd apron paradigm, the NBA doesn't know how to slot guys anymore
This post was edited on 12/6/24 at 9:51 am
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20669 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 10:41 am to
quote:

I do think the SVG debacle gave us insight into the Zion/Ingram pairing that we should have heeded long ago and broken them up already. Zion looks like he needs a hard arse coach, Ingram couldn't take it though. Coaching is a problem and you probably aren't going to find a good coach that gets the best out of both so you need to pick one.


I haven't heard anyone say this before, but I think it's true and important.

Zion 100% needs a coach to curse and scream at him, and Willie isn't that. BI just shuts down under that kind of abuse, which is why he hated SVG and wouldn't play defense for him.
Posted by jonjonsmith
Member since Jan 2024
64 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 12:24 pm to
Lol CJ won the game for us and was super clutch last night aside from one missed ft.

CJ is a ball hog, who played well, but continues to think he is the #1 option.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
25778 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

CJ is a ball hog, who played well, but continues to think he is the #1 option.


He's got the 2nd best bpm on the team behind Ingram.

2nd best VORP

Tied for 2nd in PER

If someone else on the team wants to step up they can, but until then, oops, CJ is still a really good player for us.
Posted by LSUgrad88
Member since Jun 2009
8309 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

CJ is a ball hog, who played well, but continues to think he is the #1 option.


So, so stupid.
Posted by lsukicker436
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since May 2009
117 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 1:54 pm to
You clearly didn't watch so maybe you shouldn't have an opinion based on this game. BI played the entire 3rd, scored a career high in a single quarter and is the reason we were even in a position to win. He was supposed to only play 30 mins and reached that at the end of the 3rd.

As far as his market value, I agree it should be in the low 40's and not near a max, but that can be said about a lot of players. Hell I wouldn't pay OG 40 personally, I'd rather have BI.
Posted by ghost2most
Member since Mar 2012
7737 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

You clearly didn't watch so maybe you shouldn't have an opinion based on this game. BI played the entire 3rd, scored a career high in a single quarter and is the reason we were even in a position to win. He was supposed to only play 30 mins and reached that at the end of the 3rd.



I said I missed the 3rd.

But in the 4th, it was same ole BI. One on one in crunch time. Bad shots and turnovers. I blame Willie more. Terrible strategy.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
31891 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 2:59 pm to
Let's just use Boston and their starters as an example.

There is absolutely no doubt Tatum and brown are 1a/1b. Tatum is an elite 3 level scorer while brown is just above average. Both are solid defenders. Then you have 3 guys who equally contribute unique skill sets that compliments the elite guys.

Holiday is an elite defender, average offensive player who can shoot the 3 ball solidly and handle the ball. KP when healthy is everything you want in a big man and is their mismatch guy, he is truly a difference maker when he's available. Derrick white is the IDEAL 3&D guard who can run the point efficiently.

Say what you want, but if our star (zion) was actually healthy and an actual star. We would be in a better position. Hell, I'd argue KP being on this team inplace of zion gives us a better chance the way we're currently constructed.

Herb and DJM provide nearly what holiday and white does for Boston. Ingram is a step below brown. McCollum can provide what pritchard is giving. Missi is giving you kp's defense, unfortunately none of the offense. If zion was remotely close to what Tatum overall could be, we'd be a lot better off than we are now.

Contenders? No. But a solid playoff team id say yes.
This post was edited on 12/6/24 at 3:02 pm
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
13767 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

who signs ingram to the max if he's a FA?


Maybe the Nets.

I’m still banking on a sign and trade that Griff will bend over for and we get some 2nds back….
This post was edited on 12/6/24 at 3:16 pm
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
29735 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

As far as his market value, I agree it should be in the low 40's and not near a max, but that can be said about a lot of players. Hell I wouldn't pay OG 40 personally, I'd rather have BI.



It's a nba problem and i hope its been fixed with the new tax thresholds and penatlies.

Franz Wagner deserves a 2nd contract max. Many guys deserve that 2nd contract max. BI did as well.
3rd contract max should only be given to guys who are true max players. You're all NBA lead a team deep in teh playoffs by themselves type players. BI is not that player, and neither is Franz, although he's got a few years to prove himself.

BI's making $36M this year, which is 21% of the cap.
the max 4/$208M looks like this:
$42.3M 27% of cap
$46.7M
$53.8M
$58.5M

I don't think anyone wants to give him that contract.

$38.6M is 25% of the cap, and that's what his current contract started out as. It's also basically the same adder to next years salary that he's been getting the last 5 years.

$38.6M
$42.5M
$46.8M
$51.6M

That's 4/$180M, and supposedly that's already been offered.
I personally think they should stick to that offer,

OG is making $39M next year, which I think is a gross overpay for him.
After June 30th, we can offer BI a 5 year deal, which is what NYK gave to OG. BI might agree to that extra year at the 25% salary mark (5/$236M), or he wants the 4 years but closer to $200M.

Regardless, I'd prefer to keep BI. No I don't think a BI as the #1 option can win a championship, but I'd rather that team and build around it with our young core than keep waiting on captain fat arse to care about being a professional.


Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13476 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

I said I missed the 3rd.
So, the 21 points he scored in the 3rd that erased an 11 point deficit does not matter because you did not see it and it was not in the 4th quarter? He was key to the victory.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram