- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Can anyone explain what exactly is changing with LA income tax and taxes?
Posted on 11/22/24 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 11/22/24 at 5:25 pm
I have yet to find anything that spells everything out
Posted on 11/22/24 at 5:29 pm to geauxtigers87
You may see reduced income taxes. You're gonna pay more sales tax.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 5:59 pm to geauxtigers87
Whatever it is, it will damn sure be a net gain for the state. It wouldn’t be happening otherwise. They want to steal more money.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 6:02 pm to geauxtigers87
You're going to see us get rid of state sales tax because Louisiana is on the cutting edge of leading innovation
Posted on 11/22/24 at 6:54 pm to Srbtiger06
quote:
You may see reduced income taxes, but you’re gonna have to pay more for it.
Fify
Only in Louisiana
Posted on 11/22/24 at 11:25 pm to geauxtigers87
They did not tax any of the services (or expanded base) they had talked about.
Instead they added 0.55% to the sales tax rate. From 4.45 to 5 (supposed to lower to 4.75 in 5 years—probably won’t).
Income Tax Cuts.
In exchange they tripled standard deduction to $25,000 per couple ($50,000 if over 65 on top of a $12k per person retirement income exclusion, plus a full exclusion for Social Security and all government pensions).
After that deduction the income tax rate was lowered to 3% (down from 4.25).
That is the second lowest rate in nation of those states that have income tax.
So you are getting back 1.25%+ of your income to pay 0.55% more on some of what you choose to buy—I know i’m ahead.
Corporate Reform.
Corporate closed some loopholes and lowered its rate from 7.5 to 5.5. That was more than governor’s proposed 3.5% since they would not repeal movie credit and some other giveaway credits. They did close some big corporate breaks to pay for lowering rate.
They were able to repeal the franchise tax (an economically terrible tax on investing capital in the state). That did not have a budgetary impact because it was all going into a rainy day account— That account will still have $3 billion and will now be deemed full and saved for use in future budget shortfalls (but with no more added to it).
Dave Ramsey Plan for Teacher Raise.
They took $2 billion from a state trust fund earning 3.3% and paid off teacher pension debt running at 8%. That allows the local savings on the pension costs to go to required teacher pay raise (replacing a state one-time stipend of the same amount and stopping a fight on how to keep paying for it). The savings to the state on university employee pension contributions is $10m more than what that fund was earning—so that pays for lost fund earnings.
Not quite as transformative as what was originally proposed—but definitely conservative reform and the most actual progress in Louisiana’s sordid history.
Instead they added 0.55% to the sales tax rate. From 4.45 to 5 (supposed to lower to 4.75 in 5 years—probably won’t).
Income Tax Cuts.
In exchange they tripled standard deduction to $25,000 per couple ($50,000 if over 65 on top of a $12k per person retirement income exclusion, plus a full exclusion for Social Security and all government pensions).
After that deduction the income tax rate was lowered to 3% (down from 4.25).
That is the second lowest rate in nation of those states that have income tax.
So you are getting back 1.25%+ of your income to pay 0.55% more on some of what you choose to buy—I know i’m ahead.
Corporate Reform.
Corporate closed some loopholes and lowered its rate from 7.5 to 5.5. That was more than governor’s proposed 3.5% since they would not repeal movie credit and some other giveaway credits. They did close some big corporate breaks to pay for lowering rate.
They were able to repeal the franchise tax (an economically terrible tax on investing capital in the state). That did not have a budgetary impact because it was all going into a rainy day account— That account will still have $3 billion and will now be deemed full and saved for use in future budget shortfalls (but with no more added to it).
Dave Ramsey Plan for Teacher Raise.
They took $2 billion from a state trust fund earning 3.3% and paid off teacher pension debt running at 8%. That allows the local savings on the pension costs to go to required teacher pay raise (replacing a state one-time stipend of the same amount and stopping a fight on how to keep paying for it). The savings to the state on university employee pension contributions is $10m more than what that fund was earning—so that pays for lost fund earnings.
Not quite as transformative as what was originally proposed—but definitely conservative reform and the most actual progress in Louisiana’s sordid history.
This post was edited on 11/23/24 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 11/23/24 at 12:41 am to Judg7123
That was clear and well articulated.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 1:05 am to geauxtigers87
I don't think anything else is going to end up happening. We'll see.
This post was edited on 11/23/24 at 1:09 am
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:04 am to Judg7123
So someone making $200,000 a year would get back $2,500 in income tax
And they would have to spend over $500,000 for the sales tax increase to be a net negative.
Did I math that correctly? Seems like a major W for the working class
And they would have to spend over $500,000 for the sales tax increase to be a net negative.
Did I math that correctly? Seems like a major W for the working class
This post was edited on 11/23/24 at 7:06 am
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:20 am to TigerTatorTots
An individual making $200,000 would save $2,181 (slightly less than straight up math because you’re moving from a progressive rate structure to a flat tax so slightly less savings at bottom)
you would have to spend more than $396,000 on taxable sales items to come out behind
An individual making $100k would save $851 and that person would have to spend more than $154,000 on taxable sales tax items to come out behind
An individual making $50k would save $262 And that person would have to spend more than $47,600 on taxable sales tax items to come out behind
you would have to spend more than $396,000 on taxable sales items to come out behind
An individual making $100k would save $851 and that person would have to spend more than $154,000 on taxable sales tax items to come out behind
An individual making $50k would save $262 And that person would have to spend more than $47,600 on taxable sales tax items to come out behind
This post was edited on 11/23/24 at 7:28 am
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:53 am to Creolekid
Although it is an overall tax reduction, it does not have a negative impact on the state budget
A significant amount of tax was being dedicated to particular funds
The biggest of those is a revenue stabilization fund that was separate from the budget stabilization fund
They are combining those two funds which will have over $3 billion for future budget shortfalls, and then stopping the added deposits
So the tax cut does stop deposits into government savings accounts but is not projected to have a regular budget impact
I understand there is an argument for it being good public policy for the state to save $… But there is also a good public policy argument for: once you have enough saved for a rainy day stop taking it from the people in the first place
A significant amount of tax was being dedicated to particular funds
The biggest of those is a revenue stabilization fund that was separate from the budget stabilization fund
They are combining those two funds which will have over $3 billion for future budget shortfalls, and then stopping the added deposits
So the tax cut does stop deposits into government savings accounts but is not projected to have a regular budget impact
I understand there is an argument for it being good public policy for the state to save $… But there is also a good public policy argument for: once you have enough saved for a rainy day stop taking it from the people in the first place
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:58 am to Judg7123
So this seems like something really good for those of us who work for a living
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:01 am to Judg7123
Thanks for the summary
Net positive imo
A few loopholes will emerge
Border crossings for large purchases to avoid the sale tax (ex auto)
Cash deals to avoid sale tax will increase
Net positive imo
A few loopholes will emerge
Border crossings for large purchases to avoid the sale tax (ex auto)
Cash deals to avoid sale tax will increase
Posted on 11/23/24 at 10:56 am to SelaTiger
quote:
Whatever it is, it will damn sure be a net gain for the state. It wouldn’t be happening otherwise. They want to steal more money.
Yep, LA doesn't have a revenue problem, it has a spending problem.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 11:07 am to TigerTatorTots
Why are people talking about 200k earners when that’s not who matters when it’s election time and isn’t who will be seeing the affects.. This will be framed poorly for the next 3 years unless it shows immediate success.
I don’t see how this was worth it when the big elephant is the size and scope of government. Which again will be hammered heavily in the coming years when looking at the salaries of Landry appointees.
I don’t see how this was worth it when the big elephant is the size and scope of government. Which again will be hammered heavily in the coming years when looking at the salaries of Landry appointees.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 12:54 pm to TROLA
quote:
I don’t see how this was worth it when the big elephant is the size and scope of government
I look at it as a start. There’s a huge segment of the population that don’t pay income tax. This increases their contribution and lowers those that do contribute.
I expect regular session will have more proposals to balance it out further. Cutting bloat is extremely important, but I think that’s a much bigger fight.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 1:08 pm to Judg7123
quote:
An individual making $200,000 would save $2,181 (slightly less than straight up math because you’re moving from a progressive rate structure to a flat tax so slightly less savings at bottom) you would have to spend more than $396,000 on taxable sales items to come out behind An individual making $100k would save $851 and that person would have to spend more than $154,000 on taxable sales tax items to come out behind An individual making $50k would save $262 And that person would have to spend more than $47,600 on taxable sales tax items to come out behind
That's it, I'm leaving MO and heading to LA, being over 65 me and the wife are gonna score.
Back to top
