- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Kings are still interested in BI?
Posted on 10/16/24 at 7:23 pm
Posted on 10/16/24 at 7:23 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. I'm not quite sure how that works. If Derozan works out, the Kings probably don't need either Lavine or Ingram. If Derozan doesn't work out, is doubling down on younger, more expensive versions of that player really the way to go? It is the Kings so maybe.
This post was edited on 10/16/24 at 7:24 pm
7
Posted on 10/16/24 at 7:31 pm to TigerinATL
LaVine makes more sense than Ingram as they are constructed. But they really don't have anything worth trading for.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 7:59 pm to supe12sta12z
Yeah I need a third team
Posted on 10/16/24 at 8:46 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
I'm not quite sure how that works
With more teams than 2
Posted on 10/16/24 at 9:43 pm to TigerinATL
dont give me hope
Posted on 10/16/24 at 11:11 pm to TigerinATL
Ingram and DeRozan make zero sense together.
Posted on 10/17/24 at 7:57 am to SEC Doctor
quote:
Ingram and DeRozan make zero sense together.
The only thing that makes less sense is Derozan and Lavine because that worked so well
Posted on 10/17/24 at 8:35 am to TigerinATL
Wonder if they're not as high on Keegan Murray as we think.
If so, is there a way for us to get him or does he overlap too much with TM3.
My inquiry would be getting a 3rd team involved that has a center of value (Utah - Kessler, ATL - Okongwu, Indy - Turner) and sending Murray there. He's the only piece Sacramento has of value aside from Fox/Sabonis and seems they are not going to break that duo up
If so, is there a way for us to get him or does he overlap too much with TM3.
My inquiry would be getting a 3rd team involved that has a center of value (Utah - Kessler, ATL - Okongwu, Indy - Turner) and sending Murray there. He's the only piece Sacramento has of value aside from Fox/Sabonis and seems they are not going to break that duo up
This post was edited on 10/17/24 at 8:46 am
Posted on 10/17/24 at 9:23 am to ghost2most
quote:
The only thing that makes less sense is Derozan and Lavine because that worked so well
I mean they didn't have Sabonis and Fox on the team so it would be "slightly" different. They would go from the #1 and #2 option to the #3 and #4 option... Little bit of a difference.
The reality is that they can get Lavine and a 1st while acquiring a SG that fits their roster construction.
Or
Spend 2 1sts on BI in which you already have Derozen at SF.
BI isn't going there because its just that much cheaper/ easier to get Lavine IMO
Posted on 10/17/24 at 10:13 am to Dantheman504
Sabonis for Ingram straight up ... make it happen
Posted on 10/17/24 at 10:29 am to Dantheman504
quote:
The reality is that they can get Lavine and a 1st while acquiring a SG that fits their roster construction.
Or
Spend 2 1sts on BI in which you already have Derozen at SF.
BI isn't going there because its just that much cheaper/ easier to get Lavine IMO
Posted on 10/17/24 at 10:50 am to mhasen1
My gut says Chicago is willing to pay whatever now and get picks and then have a bunch of cap room next offseason. Between Lonzo and BI that is $45m coming off the books (roughly)
Not sure what we would take back but Vucevic would make sense. Seems the Bulls want to play Williams more at the 5 and also have Jalen Smith they want to play.
Not sure what happens to Keegan Murray in this scenario but that's my read.
I could be way the F off (probably am)
Not sure what we would take back but Vucevic would make sense. Seems the Bulls want to play Williams more at the 5 and also have Jalen Smith they want to play.
Not sure what happens to Keegan Murray in this scenario but that's my read.
I could be way the F off (probably am)
Posted on 10/17/24 at 11:11 am to saints5021
give it up. Not gonna happen.
Posted on 10/17/24 at 12:09 pm to SEC Doctor
quote:
Ingram and DeRozan make zero sense together.
I can see Ingram getting traded and then taking 10 threes a game for his next team.
Posted on 10/17/24 at 12:15 pm to iwyLSUiwy
He could be doing that now and getting the max.
Posted on 10/17/24 at 1:11 pm to mhasen1
What's so funny?
The fact that Chicago is willing to give picks for Lavine or the fact that we aren't giving away picks for BI?
Or is it funny that Lavine is easier to acquire?
Or you just like to laugh?
The fact that Chicago is willing to give picks for Lavine or the fact that we aren't giving away picks for BI?
Or is it funny that Lavine is easier to acquire?
Or you just like to laugh?
This post was edited on 10/17/24 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 10/17/24 at 3:53 pm to TigerinATL
I've said since day one it would always be a 3 team trade.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News