Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Wild that the defense has had it's two best games in three years with Perkins gone

Posted on 10/15/24 at 10:53 am
Posted by HondaPilot77
Member since Jul 2024
137 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 10:53 am
Fascinating
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
16973 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 10:56 am to
In all honesty, Perkins should have been a package player. But because of his recruiting ranking and freshman year success, the coaching staff felt like he needed to be on the field every play. He's still a great player, but not as elite as we originally thought.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
53789 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 10:56 am to
Is it really necessary to bash Perkins
Let it go

I can guarantee you he would have had an impact on some games down the line
This post was edited on 10/15/24 at 11:46 am
Posted by Yaboylsu63
Member since Mar 2014
3181 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 10:57 am to
Really happy our defense is playing better ball. I’m sure HP7’s absence has made them become more sound fundamentally because you don’t have a freak athlete to make plays and cover up mistakes.

With that said - I hope HP makes a full recovery and if he comes back or goes to the NFL, puts on a show and balls out.
He’s been a loyal Tiger and we’re glad to have him.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78159 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 10:57 am to
it’s wild thai thread keeps getting made over and over.

Also… 3 years?

2 years ago we held Ole Miss to less points and less yards.
This post was edited on 10/15/24 at 11:04 am
Posted by TN Tygah
Member since Nov 2023
7837 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Also… 3 years?


2.5
Posted by CatholicLSUDude
Member since Aug 2018
1030 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Is it really necessary to bash Perkins


I think the point is fair and can easily be discussed without "bashing" Perkins. It does look like they were trying so hard to make him work they overlooked other options.
Posted by Laman1978
Earth
Member since Jan 2009
11471 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 11:09 am to
His insistence on playing a traditional MLB is what held him back. It's a moot point now.
Posted by Billy Johnson
Member since Oct 2024
432 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 11:13 am to
The defense has improved a little bit, but that will only carry the team so far. We have some serious deficiencies on the offensive side of the ball that will cost us several games this season unless Sloan makes play-calling changes, which probably won’t happen.

It’s not what people want to hear following a crazy win over a top 10 team, but it’s just the truth.
This post was edited on 10/15/24 at 11:23 am
Posted by TigerScorpion
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2018
1700 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 11:14 am to
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
60623 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 11:16 am to
quote:

has made them become more sound fundamentally because you don’t have a freak athlete to make plays and cover up mistakes.
was this happening?
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
60623 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 11:18 am to
I was down on Sloan the first half. But credit Ole Miss, they were in coverages we haven’t seen out of them all year. I don’t understand why the under stuff wasn’t open early but oh well. We don’t have an offensive problem. Winning that game without a running game was pretty damn great
Posted by Billy Johnson
Member since Oct 2024
432 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Winning that game without a running game was pretty damn great


This team will need a run game if they want to beat A&M and Alabama
Posted by Prowler257
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2017
46 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 11:21 am to
He's a great athlete. Not a great football player.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51846 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Perkins should have been a package player.

Maybe
quote:

But because of his recruiting ranking and freshman year success, the coaching staff felt like he needed to be on the field every play

Definitely not! There are too many highly ranked players who have not been seeing time. The 5 star WR for example.

Some posters think the coaching staff is the faculty from Romper Room.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78159 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 11:30 am to
quote:

I think the point is fair and can easily be discussed without "bashing" Perkins. It does look like they were trying so hard to make him work they overlooked other options.


it just has been.

Here

Here

Here

and in pretty much every thread about Whit Weeks or Perkins injury.

Posted by themunch
bottom of the list
Member since Jan 2007
71274 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 11:34 am to
It could also be that the defense has been coming around all along.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
17043 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

2 years ago we held Ole Miss to less points and less yards.

Thanks to the offense's ability to stay on the field and keep the ball out of Ole Miss's hands.

2022
Time of Possession LSU 36:19, Ole Miss 23:41; LSU +12:38
Total Plays: LSU 76, Ole Miss 72
Yards/Play: LSU 6.58 yards, Ole Miss 5.61 yards

2024
Time of Possession: LSU 28:10, Ole Miss 31:50 Ole Miss +3.40
Total Plays: LSU 75, Ole Miss 84
Yards per Play: LSU 5.61 yards, Ole Miss 5.52 yards
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
6616 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

This team will need a run game if they want to beat A&M and Alabama

Bama’s defense is trash & Ole Miss’ D is better. Quit crying.
Posted by Dotarian
Midwest
Member since Oct 2012
1684 posts
Posted on 10/15/24 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

His insistence on playing a traditional MLB is what held him back. It's a moot point now.
Is this a known fact, or just speculation? Not bashing, just genuinely curious.

I've often wondered if the misuse of Perkins for the last two years was because of the defensive coaches trying to shoehorn him in as a tweener to positions he wouldn't thrive in, or if it was Perkins pushing to get development at a position he really wanted but wasn't really built for.

If it's the latter, I could see the devil's choice that the defensive coaches would have to consider: either try and fit Perkins into his preferred position and help him develop, or risk him leaving via the portal for a team where he would get the opportunity he truly wanted.

Note: I am NOT saying that Perkins was making those threats (play me or I leave), I'm only speculating about the implications facing our defensive coaches if Perkins wasn't given the opportunity he wanted.

If Perkins was truly adamant about wanting to be a MLB, he wouldn't really have to make threats about leaving; these days, players hit the portal for much less.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram