Started By
Message
locked post

Why Have Nukes

Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:59 am
Posted by Pvt Hudson
Member since Jan 2013
4886 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 8:59 am
If you won’t use them?

What part of Iran indiscriminately lobbing hundreds of missiles into a city of civilians doesn’t mitigate a response by Israel to obliterate the threat?
Posted by Ricardo
Member since Sep 2016
6414 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:02 am to
I think low-yield nukes will be on the table eventually. But only when the strategic value warrants it. City destroyers are for mutually assured destruction. No one wants that.

Posted by RolltidePA
North Carolina
Member since Dec 2010
5472 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:05 am to
quote:

If you won’t use them?



Mutually assured destruction.
Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
24907 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:05 am to
quote:

If you won’t use them?


We have nukes so we do not have to use them...
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
50081 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:07 am to
So we can every once in a while have a president like Trump who will outwardly threaten our enemies with using them so that we don't have to worry about using them.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
19344 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:08 am to
Why have auto insurance if you're a good driver?

Why have medical insurance if you're healthy?

Why pay taxes on our income of it's not necessary to funding the government?

Why do birds suddenly appear, every time you are near?
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
25206 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:09 am to
quote:

Why Have Nukes if you won’t use them?


I think that's kind of the point.

Israel knows that launching a nuke into Iran will trigger a nuclear response from other countries which will be the end of the world. We're very fortunate that they're aware of that and don't essentially just worship death like radical Islam does.

Hopefully your tone isn't indicating that you'd like to see them used. I mean, if that's something you'd be looking forward to, you wouldn't be able to enjoy it very long before you, your entire family and everything you've ever held dear is instantly vaporized into fire and bloody mists.

Unless you were just looking forward to the cancers that will very quickly overtake anyone who's left living in a nuclear hellscape. I'm sure that will be a good time.
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
17704 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:09 am to
You better hope not. You got an under ground bunker.
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
50081 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:12 am to
It'd be nice if Israel and America had bombs that are equally as destructive as a nuke but without the fallout.

Who knows, maybe we do already have that are aren't advertising it. I don't know. If Israel has that, I'm hoping they drop about 50 of them on Tehran soon.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
83380 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Why Have Nukes
If you won’t use them


That's fricking sick

You are fricking sick

This post was edited on 10/2/24 at 9:40 am
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
11013 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:13 am to
Because other countries have them. It's that simple. Are you an idiot?

Oh, and why don't you use them? Because other countries have them.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
83380 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:13 am to
Fuel Air bombs
Posted by TigerSprings
Southeast LA
Member since Jan 2019
2402 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:18 am to
quote:

low-yield nukes

How many MTs do you consider "low-yield"?
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:18 am to
Lots of tards talking nukes the past couple days.
Posted by Ricardo
Member since Sep 2016
6414 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:19 am to
quote:

It'd be nice if Israel and America had bombs that are equally as destructive as a nuke but without the fallout.



That's why the neutron bomb was developed. A "cleaner" nuke that prioritizes killing while minimizing collateral damage and making the area habitable in a shorter period of time. Israel, was making these in the 80s.
Posted by LB84
Member since May 2016
4488 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:20 am to
quote:

If you won’t use them?


This is the same mindset leftists have about guns. They think because you have them you want to shoot people. No I have guns to protect myself from being a victim of evil people. I don't have a desire to blow people away. It's something you only do when you have to.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
18639 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:20 am to
Well at one time some scientists discovered something and politicians thought they could use it to destroy the next upcoming tribe. Good thing for politicians right !!!
Posted by Ricardo
Member since Sep 2016
6414 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:21 am to
quote:

How many MTs do you consider "low-yield"?



Less than 10 KT.
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
17704 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:42 am to
What they call em. Tactical nukes. As General Flynn says. There are no tactical nukes. A nuke is a frickin nuke
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
83380 posts
Posted on 10/2/24 at 9:47 am to
People being OK with the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians being horrifically burned and melted (Best case scenario).

Children and babies screaming and melting in their parent's arms.

Because you are mad at a bombing that killed, apparently, one guy (a Palestinian)

Fuuuuuuck right the hell off
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram