"Am I Racist?" documentary opens today in theaters...

What is a women was great. Looking forward to this one.

The women at the end is Robin DiAngelo.


If you’re not forced to be kept in the loop on DEI developments by your employer, it would be normal to not know who she is… but Robin DiAngelo is arguably one of the two biggest mainstream advocates for the extreme version of DEI that really goes off the rails (it’s her and Ibrahm X. Kendi). She wrote White Fragility, which was a New York Times best seller and is often used by DEI trainers as something akin to their version of a Bible. She’s a figurehead of the antiracist movement, one who’s full time job is to go around the country to universities and firms to “teach” adults how to fight against the racism that is inherent within them.


Now I obviously don’t know the extent to which Walsh engages with her in good faith or in pursuit of deeper understanding. But I do know she’s not seen as “ the most extreme examples of stereotypes” by the left… she’s fully at the center of DEI advocacy at this point

quote:

---

Like is there anything in here that might remotely challenge his way of thinking (or my extension the viewer) or does he just find the most extreme examples of stereotypes to prove his point?

---

That's a bit of the problem. The core issue itself, that whites are inherently racists and blacks are inherently victims, is an extreme philosophy but is being normalized through the demand of acceptance (or else you'll be considered a racist).

To bring this back, briefly, to the trans issue: the most recent SCOTUS Justice (Brown) was asked during her questioning before Congress to define what a woman is. She responded that she couldn't because she wasn't a biologist. If you don't see the level of normalization to where a prospective (and then approved) Justice of the Supreme Court promotes such counter-reality points that it's impossible (or, at least, politically undesirable) to define something as basic as what a woman is (it's a human who was born with a vagina and has now reached adulthood) without some advanced degree, then you've already succumbed to the propaganda to the point where you can no longer discern reality.

To bring it back to the racism platform, there are absolutely those out there who propone DEI/CRT and alter reality in order to have a point every bit as much as the pro-trans movement tries to muddy waters between "man" and "woman" in an attempt to redefine them as having no concrete meaning. A great example of the racial aspect is the 1619 Project, created by Nikole Hannah-Jones.

If you aren't aware of it, the 1619 Project attempts to re-write history by presenting the Revolutionary War as a war against England for the colonies to keep slavery. The claim is so blatantly false that historians who specialize in 17th century slavery have called it bullshite. I can't find the article now, but one who was used by the Project for various historical data stated that not only was the way they used that data wrong but that she had contacted the Times and the author about it before publishing and they both ignored her.

Let me say this a bit more clearly: the 1619 Project re-writes history to falsely make slavery the central point (or at least "a" central point) behind the Revolutionary War and it has won a Pulitzer Prize.

That sort of rhetorical foundation is what's used to create the argument that "the whole system is built on racism". By "the whole system", they mean everything. Math, English, highways, courts, laws, etc. Everything. Because of that, everything must be "rebuilt" with the goal of "equity" (the E in DEI, which is a fancy way of saying "equal outcomes" as opposed to "equal opportunities"). Anything where blacks do not achieve at the same level of whites (and now they include asians, at times) is then racist (by default) and must be changed in ways which allow blacks to achieve at the same level.

Almost every college or university has a DEI office now.

None of this is speculation, it's easily researched reality. If you don't believe me, look it up for yourself. Once you do, ask yourself which is propaganda: an award-winning lie which is being used to craft policy or the pointing out that it's built on a lie.

To me, DEI is propaganda that has reached levels which would make Joseph Goebbels proud.

So if she applying similar tactics as Sweet Baby Inc, which is a consultant firm that promotes DEI and if a studio refuses to hire them they put out hit pieces in various media calling them sexist, racist, etc?

Or are companies just so scared of not being viewed positive at this point that they just hire her regardless?

My employer has never had any real DEI crap and my previous job was before any of this crap was mainstream so when it comes to a workplace environment I pretty much as clueless.

Looks like at 1:38 he's on Bourbon Street

quote:

---

Or am I just missing the point and this is just about mocking the opposing viewpoints

---

I know nothing about Matt Walsh or this movie, but I assume he's really just mocking and poking fun at these people. Their belief system is so off the rails that it really doesn't warrant serious consideration.

quote:

---

Like is there anything in here that might remotely challenge his way of thinking (or my extension the viewer) or does he just find the most extreme examples of stereotypes to prove his point?

---

You’re asking the wrong place, Matt Walsh and all the Daily Wire peddle right wing propaganda of course you’re going to get downvoted to oblivion because this board lacks total self awareness for the most part.

Holy crap

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

Their belief system is so off the rails that it really doesn't warrant serious consideration.

---

Doesn't warrant serious consideration? It's the defacto law of the land in the financial sector because of the control over lending institutions the progressive globalists have. You're about 15 years too late to dismiss it as just some fringe bunch of wackos on college campuses.

quote:

---

Like is there anything in here that might remotely challenge his way of thinking (or my extension the viewer) or does he just find the most extreme examples of stereotypes to prove his point?

---

The entire premise of “What is a Woman?” Is Matt just dead pan asking professionals that title question and letting them talk. I just don’t see how letting the opposing opinion talk and hang themselves can be strictly considered propoganda.