- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

New Louisiana law will criminalize approaching police under certain circumstances
Posted on 5/30/24 at 9:59 am
Posted on 5/30/24 at 9:59 am
quote:
Critics of a new Louisiana law, which makes it a crime to approach within 25 feet (7.6 meters) of a police officer under certain circumstances, fear that the measure could hinder the public’s ability to film officers — a tool that has increasingly been used to hold police accountable.
Under the law, anyone who is convicted of “knowingly or intentionally” approaching an officer, who is “lawfully engaged in the execution of his official duties,” and after being ordered to “stop approaching or retreat” faces up to a $500 fine, up to 60 days in jail or both. The law was signed by Gov. Jeff Landry, a Republican, Tuesday and goes into effect Aug. 1.
While the legislation's language does not specifically mention filming, critics say that by default it would limit how close a person can be to observe police. Opponents have also gone further to question the law's constitutionality, saying it could impede on a person's First Amendment rights.
Proponents argue the new law will create a buffer-zone to help ensure the safety of officers and that bystanders would still be close enough to film police interactions.
Bystander cellphone videos are largely credited with revealing police misconduct — such as with the 2020 killing of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis officers — and reshaping the conversation around police transparency.
LINK
This post was edited on 5/30/24 at 10:00 am
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:01 am to John88
law is bullshite and straight up boot licking imo
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:02 am to John88
Yeah that unconstitutional shite would never be abused by the high school grads
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:03 am to John88
I really don't like this. Supreme court has ruled you can film anything in public from public which I believe is what this law is looking to limit. Bad look for republicans.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:05 am to John88
25 feet is plenty close enough to film. Zoom on phones are good at much further distances. You don't have to get closer.
Come on ppl.
Come on ppl.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:06 am to broadhead
quote:
I really don't like this. Supreme court has ruled you can film anything in public from public which I believe is what this law is looking to limit.
No it’s not. It’s a 25’ buffer. People can still film.
However, I agree with the other posters. It will probably get abused.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:08 am to John88
As much as I support law enforcement, this is insane imo. Will 100% be abused. Disgusting.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:08 am to John88
How do they measure the 25 feet? Is it an approximation of the officers?
“Suspect moved within my perceived buffer range of 25 feet leading to their arrest.”
“Suspect moved within my perceived buffer range of 25 feet leading to their arrest.”
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:09 am to StringedInstruments
quote:
How do they measure the 25 feet? Is it an approximation of the officers?
“Suspect moved within my perceived buffer range of 25 feet leading to their arrest.”
The police will lie and even if you were 100 yards away it wont matter
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:09 am to John88
They are just proposing the most random bs laws and not addressing a single real issue. It’s a fricking waste of time and of everyone’s tax dollars. This is the reason our state will always remain in last at everything. The next law should require IQ testing to discern eligibility for running for office.
This post was edited on 5/30/24 at 10:11 am
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:11 am to jaytothen
quote:
25 feet is plenty close enough to film. Zoom on phones are good at much further distances. You don't have to get closer.
Sure, and 5 ft doesn't make the officer unsafe. This law only enhances the officer's ability to over reach their authority. If they don't like something you're doing...lock em up for coming to close. What if I am doing something and then the officer comes within 25ft of me? It's already illegal to harm an officer, so this only serves to harm people with good intentions within 25ft of an officer.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:11 am to StringedInstruments
quote:This is the part that could be abused.
“Suspect moved within my perceived buffer range of 25 feet leading to their arrest.”
But the officer has to be engaged and has to order the person to stop or retreat.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:12 am to jaytothen
quote:
25 feet is plenty close enough to film. Zoom on phones are good at much further distances. You don't have to get closer.
Is it the rubber or dirt and occasional poo you like the taste of?
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:12 am to BigBinBR
quote:
No it’s not. It’s a 25’ buffer. People can still film. However, I agree with the other posters. It will probably get abused.
What if there is an obstruction (car etc) within 25 feet blocking view?
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:13 am to John88
quote:
Bystander cellphone videos are largely credited with revealing police misconduct — such as with the 2020 killing of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis officers — and reshaping the conversation around police transparency.
I thought everyone was finally on the same page. Who still believes this?
Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:15 am to John88
quote:
Gov. Jeff Landry, a Republican

Posted on 5/30/24 at 10:15 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
What if there is an obstruction (car etc) within 25 feet blocking view?
This is where my mind went. Detain a guy between a dumpster and a wall, you can get away with anything.
Popular
Back to top
