- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LA. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of St. George Incorporators
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:12 pm
Opinion
quote:
Cole has the statutory right to challenge the incorporation of St. George. However, his real and actual interest is limited to the adverse impact incorporation will have on Baton Rouge, a municipality in the vicinity, and whether St. George can timely provide services. Despite the challenge, we conclude St. George can provide public services within a reasonable period of time. Applying objective factors to determine reasonableness, we hold incorporation is reasonable. We reverse the lower courts’ denial of incorporation and render judgment in favor of Proponents
This post was edited on 4/26/24 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:15 pm to bulletprooftiger
Wow, this has been a 10 year battle. Congrats to St. George and its residents.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:15 pm to bulletprooftiger
But they need St George residents to support them in BR, it wouldn’t be fair!
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:15 pm to bulletprooftiger
Suck it Broomhilda!
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:16 pm to bulletprooftiger
Well, St George it is. I look forward to low taxes, good schools, armed perimeters, and parades with bagpipes and delightful European cheeses and meats.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:17 pm to bulletprooftiger
Congrats baws.
I'm a Texan but have followed this for years! Congrats on being able to self govern.
Get wrecked Broome.
I'm a Texan but have followed this for years! Congrats on being able to self govern.
Get wrecked Broome.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:17 pm to bulletprooftiger
I didn't read this, and I know my answer may be in the link, but does this make it a done deal?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:19 pm to bulletprooftiger
Viva villa San Jorge’
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:22 pm to bulletprooftiger
Nicholson will need it's own loop with how much development is about to explode down there.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:24 pm to bulletprooftiger
Thank God
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:26 pm to bulletprooftiger
I knew this was coming soon. I put in a work order with the city the week before the vote in October 2019. They just came this week and completed the work.
Figured the decision wouldn’t been that far behind.
Figured the decision wouldn’t been that far behind.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:26 pm to bulletprooftiger
I was surprised at the identity of the dissenting judges.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:27 pm to bulletprooftiger
Congrats St. George!
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:28 pm to bulletprooftiger
I guess I live in St George now. It’s been way too long that they were alllowed to drag this out.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:29 pm to bulletprooftiger
LFG!
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:30 pm to bulletprooftiger
This post was edited on 4/26/24 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:31 pm to bulletprooftiger
We all should thank Chris Rials and Norman Browning for taking on city hall and carrying a heavy load for all of us out here in SG. Thanks guys and thank you to all the others who helped win this grass roots struggle.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:36 pm to bulletprooftiger
About time. frick Broome with a broom handle sideways. Crook.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:39 pm to bulletprooftiger
Mayor Broome screwed herself here. The governor appoints the first leadership of the new city. When the election occurred that would have been JBE. He would have very likely had someone in there that was somewhat hostile to the new city, and it definitely would have been one of his Democrat buddies.
By Broome prolonging this, a Republican governor will now make that appointment.
By Broome prolonging this, a Republican governor will now make that appointment.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:40 pm to bulletprooftiger
This part was nice...
State Supreme Court basically told the Appellate "do you even law, baw?"
quote:
No voter or elector residing or owning land in the proposed area of incorporation objected to the petition. Thus, one can reasonably conclude they found the plan adequate. Only those persons have a real and actual interest in that claim. Only they can claim insufficient information in the petition to make an informed vote.
Cole neither resides in nor owns property in St. George. He did not, and could not, vote in the election. Consequently, he has no real or actual interest in challenging the sufficiency of the petition. Because no one from within the incorporated area objected to it, the court of appeal erred in considering the sufficiency of the petition. Thus, we reverse.8
quote:
8 Even if Cole had standing to challenge the sufficiency of the petition, we find no error in the trial court’s conclusion that the plan for the provision of services was statutorily compliant. The trial court’s finding that the plan was “minimally” compliant is true inasmuch as the statute itself requires minimal compliance in its silence as to the requirements of the plan. Thus, regardless of the standing holding, we would reverse the court of appeal on the merit.
State Supreme Court basically told the Appellate "do you even law, baw?"
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News