- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge: Jury Sees Secret Files or Trump Wins
Posted on 3/19/24 at 7:14 am to WPBTiger
Posted on 3/19/24 at 7:14 am to WPBTiger
Show them to the jurors under controlled circumstances. That isn’t terribly difficult. But they should also monitor the jurors to see if they have any improper contacts with outside agents. Advise the jurors that all of this is going on, and get on with it.
12
Posted on 3/19/24 at 7:28 am to TBoy
quote:
Show them to the jurors under controlled circumstances. That isn’t terribly difficult.
Gee? I wonder why they didn’t think of just not handing the documents out like circus flyers in the hall of the courthouse??
The problem here, genius, is the jurors do not have authority to view the documents. They are either secrets that would compromise national security… or they aren’t. The matter in which you disclose them isn’t the issue. It’s WHO you disclose them to.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 7:30 am to TBoy
quote:
But they should also monitor the jurors to see if they have any improper contacts with outside agents.
So basically change the jury selection process?
Prosecutors only get to disqualify a certain number of individuals, just like the defense. You're saying that the prosecution should be able to nitpick as many as they want and not the defense.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 8:21 am to TBoy
what if he's just a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory?
case dismissed right, turd?
case dismissed right, turd?
Posted on 3/19/24 at 8:33 am to TBoy
quote:
Show them to the jurors under controlled circumstances. That isn’t terribly difficult. But they should also monitor the jurors to see if they have any improper contacts with outside agents. Advise the jurors that all of this is going on, and get on with it.
So they can't be like democratic politicians and operatives and plan releases of senstitive material with the media?
Why not? That doesn't sound fair.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:01 am to TBoy
quote:
TBoy
You should modify your username to LOW TBoy
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:03 am to TBoy
What’s the point? A jury of laypersons should decide whether something should be classified? Their opinion is irrelevant. Once a document is officially classified, the law regulating same is applicable.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:04 am to TBoy
quote:
Show them to the jurors under controlled circumstances. That isn’t terribly difficult. But they should also monitor the jurors to see if they have any improper contacts with outside agents. Advise the jurors that all of this is going on, and get on with it.
I thought classified material should be kept and guarded to the most stringent measures.
As long as you aren’t Joe Biden, of course…
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:45 am to TBoy
quote:
Show them to the jurors under controlled circumstances. That isn’t terribly difficult. But they should also monitor the jurors to see if they have any improper contacts with outside agents. Advise the jurors that all of this is going on, and get on with it.
Lmao. Jury duty should never lead to 1984 style surveillance.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 10:07 am to TBoy
quote:
Show them to the jurors under controlled circumstances. That isn’t terribly difficult. But they should also monitor the jurors to see if they have any improper contacts with outside agents. Advise the jurors that all of this is going on, and get on with it.
You're using common sense but still being down voted. This seems to be exactly what the judge is saying. It appears that the government prosecutor doesn't want this, which means the documents aren't nearly as bad as they want us to think they are. Jack is just being your typical scummy lawyer who knows he has no case.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 2:10 pm to TBoy
quote:
Show them to the jurors under controlled circumstances. That isn’t terribly difficult.
No shite man. The stuff would be shown at court. They aren't taking documents home.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 11:34 am to TBoy
quote:
Show them to the jurors under controlled circumstances. That isn’t terribly difficult. But they should also monitor the jurors to see if they have any improper contacts with outside agents. Advise the jurors that all of this is going on, and get on with it.
How about just shooting them after we get their opinion? Just think of it as real late term abortion. It's kind of the way you fascists roll.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 12:55 pm to TBoy
Let them see the files marked "SECRET" chances are that it was never that secret to begin with.
Now the TS/SCI stuff....give them all TS/SCI clearances in a limited capacity and allow them to view the files with the assurance that if the info is leaked that they will be the first ones that the FBI will pick up.
Now the TS/SCI stuff....give them all TS/SCI clearances in a limited capacity and allow them to view the files with the assurance that if the info is leaked that they will be the first ones that the FBI will pick up.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News