- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supreme Court Rules for Trump
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:54 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:54 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
Truly a great poster and as a fan of trolling - This is A1
He did a great job. Definitely got some meaty bites.
2
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:56 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I don't doubt it The fact that Trump and his sycophants have infiltrated law enforcement to this extent should horrify all Americans
If you search this word you’ll see all the alts use the same word
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:59 pm to RogerTheShrubber
The most loyal Trump dudes are so desperate for opposition on here that they'll take the hook even if they know it's a ruse
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:05 pm to themunch
Yikes
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:07 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Promoted terrorism on January 6 that permanently harmed millions. The injury to Americans who watched in horror and whose confidence in democracy was shattered is incalculable. I know many who haven't slept well since that day.
Give the trolling effort a C+.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:09 pm to hg
Jerryjb63 now has a file at Fort Meade.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:23 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
A strong man tried to use his private militia to stop democracy and you're concerned about a court trying to keep him from doing it again?
Is recess over at DU yet?This post was edited on 3/4/24 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:25 pm to udtiger
quote:
I fricking was saying that this was the only reasonable constitutional interpretation from the start. A certain Pro that is all about a Flo that is Slow thought otherwise.
I pointed out to the idiot multiple timees. There actually is a federal statute:
quote:
18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection
Yet, over and over, the idiot could not comprehend... said not true. And he is in here like a moth to a flame. Just cannot keep away.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:26 pm to LSU5508
Think he will ever get out of paying the bazillion dollars in fines and bail money?
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:27 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
With SCOTUS now fully on board with authoritarian Trump, there is genuinely no protection left for regular citizens
right...or...and here's an idea... he was never guilty of anything.
Also, if anyone feels at risk by trump they can just vote against him again.... that's how it works. This country gets to vote for what it wants....or are you worried after the last 4 years that this country wants another Trump term and you wanted someone to rig the system against that?
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:34 pm to LSU5508
This makes me happy. I don’t give a frick if it was Biden being held off the ballot.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:37 pm to RogerTheShrubber
“Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.” George Carlin.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:40 pm to LSU5508
Democratic Underground is in full meltdown mode.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If the court was trying to rely on the impeachment argument, why didn't they, you know, rely on the impeachment argument?
Echo chamber content creators have tried to force that into both cases. Why didn't the USSC even address that for a minute in this case?
This may stem from my post, and if so let me try and clean up any confusion.
I believe SCOTUS's ruling today with clear indication that it is up to Congress to make a 14th Amendment Section 3 determination regarding a candidate for federal office.
I further believe that in regards to Executive Immunity for POTUS they will similarly kick it back to Congress that it is up to them, via the impeachment process, to determine if immunity applies.
The rationale being that it is not up to Fulton County DA's and their lovers nor is it up to the DOJ to determine if immunity applies.
Based on Separation of Powers, it would be up to Congress to hold a POTUS accountable. Period.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:48 pm to flownthecoop
quote:
I believe SCOTUS's ruling today with clear indication that it is up to Congress to make a 14th Amendment Section 3 determination regarding a candidate for federal office.
Because the 14A has a specific section mandating this.
quote:
I further believe that in regards to Executive Immunity for POTUS they will similarly kick it back to Congress that it is up to them, via the impeachment process, to determine if immunity applies.
This is a completely different process. Why would this logically have anything to do the case today?
Again, if they wanted to discuss the impeachment avenue, they had the perfect opportunity to do so. They did not, so there is nothing to be assumed for any other case regarding the impeachment avenue.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:58 pm to hg
This gets you banned on TD. On Reddit they send you flowers. fricking scum.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 2:05 pm to Dirk Dawgler
Don’t forget Hail Hail is decimated.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 2:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
SCOTUS is not known to add in other thoughts on pending cases when ruling on a particular case.
I happen to be using not just logic but knowledge & expertise with SCOTUS rulings to indicate that when they ultimately rule on the immunity case they will tell Congress that it is up to them to determine if POTUS immunity applies.
I clearly indicated I am making a supposition of how they will rule on the pending immunity case based on how they ruled today on the Colorado nonsense.
I happen to be using not just logic but knowledge & expertise with SCOTUS rulings to indicate that when they ultimately rule on the immunity case they will tell Congress that it is up to them to determine if POTUS immunity applies.
I clearly indicated I am making a supposition of how they will rule on the pending immunity case based on how they ruled today on the Colorado nonsense.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 2:10 pm to 88Wildcat
quote:
What are rational and reasonable penalties for the political hacks to hold them accountable to the rule of law?
quote:
he decisions of judges have the same potential to be life and death decisions as those professions.
Isnt this the same court that screwed the baker twice?
They are beyond bad as a court and really need to be removed at all cost.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 2:13 pm to BigPerm30
quote:
This gets you banned on TD. On Reddit they send you flowers. fricking scum.
I would contend that the more appropriate order from Biden in this scenario would be to use the military or possibly a cocaine fueled Hunter to do Trump in.
And I would also contend that Biden would be immune if he could make the case that he was acting in his official duties and "saving Democracy from MAGA" during his impeachment. Given the corrupt goons in the Senate on the left plus folks like Mitch and Mittens, the vote would be 52-48 to acquit Biden.
Don't give the libs any ideas...
Page 12 of 15
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News