Started By
Message

re: In just a few years, the average retiree will be receiving 37% more in SS than he paid in

Posted on 2/25/24 at 1:44 pm to
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58317 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 1:44 pm to
Are they receiving more payments than what they would have received if they were allowed to invest the money taken from their checks against their will?
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20287 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

In just a few years,


Imminent?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124546 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

They also robbed from the social security fund to balance the budget.
That

is

the

design

of

Social Security.

---

Social Security is not a retirement benefit!
Social Security is certainly not a welfare benefit.

SS is a debt management vehicle for the Federal Government. It is simply marketed as a retirement program. As a debt vehicle, it is a huge Fed benefit. As a retirement program it sucks.

From its inception in the 1930's, SS tax contributions were immediately converted to debt instruments. This allowed the government to spend SS tax revenue anyway it wanted, just as is the case with debt instruments like US T-bills, T-notes, etc.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19981 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 2:13 pm to
quote:


I've said this. If they want to give me what I paid in with no interest, I would sign off and take the cash now and pay for building a new house. Im 46 and have been paying SS wince I was 12. I account for close to 250k so far and I went through the tech boom. If it were invested in a simple index fund as I put it in, it would probably worth a few million with interest at this point.


The SS "Trust Fund" is a skimming operation because it typically pays interest lower than inflation. 2% interest with 4% inflation is a racket.

$1000 forty years ago would produce about $2,000 at 2% compound interest. The stock market has averaged a gain of about 9% per year over the last 40 years. 9% compound interest over 40 years would produce about $36,000.

If SS was a private pension producing the results that it does, the managers would go to jail.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124546 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

[img]If SS was a private pension producing the results that it does, the managers would go to jail.
Nah. That's sort of how bank CDs work. Of course given SS ROI, they'd never have a buyer.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69459 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 6:43 pm to
This thread is a good example of the is-ought problem.

Fact: ss and Medicare are financial ticking time bombs. The programs are taking in less than they are paying out

Yet we have people in this thread saying ss should be paying them even more than it currently does.

From where should the govt get this extra money to give ss recipients? Because the govt doesn’t have the money right now
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
49044 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

Im 46 and have been paying SS wince I was 12. I account for close to 250k so far and I went through the tech boom. If it were invested in a simple index fund as I put it in, it would probably worth a few million with interest at this point.

Yep. It's a scam Ponzi scheme.
This post was edited on 2/25/24 at 6:49 pm
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45345 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 6:51 pm to
Boomer naivety and sense of entitlement will mean that we face disaster instead of dealing with the problem.

And they don't care, they are, by and large, the most selfish generation in American history

Younger Gen X through Gen Z all know we are paying into a system that we will not get the benefits of, yet we don't complain 10% as much as a boomer when you suggest the slightest cut or age raise to SS
Posted by Warfarer
Dothan, AL
Member since May 2010
12143 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

Yet we have people in this thread saying ss should be paying them even more than it currently does.

From where should the govt get this extra money to give ss recipients? Because the govt doesn’t have the money right now



My problem is that people call social security an entitlement like welfare. If you pay into a system that is designed a certain way, such as SS, then you are owed what you are promised. If the government wants to cut if off, then do it and write a check to people that have paid in to it.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425279 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

If the government wants to cut if off, then do it and write a check to people that have paid in to it.


The fact that they can't do this shows you that it was never designed the way you think it is.

You ignorantly believed talking points and PR instead of what the system/program actually was.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28896 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 7:26 pm to
Social Security threads are always entertaining.
Posted by DiamondDog
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2019
10677 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 7:31 pm to
7/16 career years I worked for State of LA and paid no SS taxes.

I have since made a ton more money, but here is my personal breakdown at 38 years old.

Social Security Taxes Paid: $65,397

I'm eligible for full earnings and at 67 I'll have $3,699/mo.

If I delay until 70: $4,615/mo.

There is absolutely 0 chance I probably see any of this money but it's a nice thought.

We don't factor any of this into our retirement plans. If I get anything from SS, it'll probably go to my kids for a living stipend. Their mother makes as much money as I do.

How cool will it be to be able to give your kids $3700 a month each as a living stipend. I hope they absolutely live it up on Government's dime.

I don't consider it "my money", I consider it a tax. I'll likely never get a benefit. If I do, see above.
This post was edited on 2/25/24 at 7:34 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53532 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 7:36 pm to
Had they not taken people's money ey, they could have invested it and make up that 37%.

I did not ask for the fed gov to limit me by taxes.


Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425279 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

I did not ask for the fed gov to limit me by taxes.

You have the opportunity to stop the welfare program doing this to younger voters
Posted by DiamondDog
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2019
10677 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 7:42 pm to
People wouldn't invest a dime is social security went away today.

There'd be mass chaos. Crime would explode.

People really underestimate how SS is less a retirement plan and more of a way to keep underclass fed and at bay.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53532 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

People wouldn't invest a dime is social security went away today.


Yes they would.


quote:

People really underestimate how SS is less a retirement plan and more of a way to keep underclass fed and at bay.


Not the point. The point is, it's my money. The fed gov took it with the idea of giving it back at retirement.

That is where we are.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57517 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

Al Gore talked about it. Lockbox. You may tease that nerd to holy high heaven but he was right about it.
Right about what? There never was a "lockbox". By the time Gore ran, that "lockbox" had already been raided. And the government already could not afford to pay it back. Gore never ran on doubling or tripling the SS tax (which is what it would have taken).

quote:

George Bush said "It's your money. I will cut taxes" (and he did just that after the Iraq war had started (or was impending in any event)).
How much did GWB cut the SS tax? How much did he cut medicare tax? The 2007 deficit was about $160 billion. 1/10th of what it will be this year. Clearly, it's all Bush's fault.


quote:

Clinton and Gore, say what you want, if those policies had been continued, things would not be so bad now.
What policies?
Posted by sweatyfreddy
Member since Feb 2024
129 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 9:36 pm to
Eliminate it! Or, you can do the leftist limbo.


LINK
This post was edited on 2/25/24 at 9:39 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57517 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

write a check to people that have paid in to it.
It stopped being your money the day you gave it to the government.

Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57517 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

Crime would explode.
Taking 30% of one's entire labor is a crime.
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram