Started By
Message

Largest study yet links COVID vaccine to adverse health effects

Posted on 2/20/24 at 8:52 am
Posted by FutureCorridor49
US 90
Member since May 2023
320 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 8:52 am
Bloomberg

quote:

The rare events — identified early in the pandemic — included a higher risk of heart-related inflammation from mRNA shots made by Pfizer Inc., BioNTech SE, and Moderna Inc., and an increased risk of a type of blood clot in the brain after immunization with viral-vector vaccines such as the one developed by the University of Oxford and made by AstraZeneca Plc.



Forcing people to get a brand new vaccine linked to ”surprising” adverse outcomes. Who ever could have guessed such a thing.


I was never anti-vaccine (but I got the old school J&J one) and I think they were a lifesaver for countless people who were more at-risk for whatever reason. But trying to force it on everyone was one of the most bizarre and unsettling things I’ve seen.


Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23016 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 8:53 am to
Is this why my a-hole has been itching?
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
51043 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 8:55 am to
Pureblood checking in
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
16492 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 8:56 am to
Thankfully I’m a pureblood. I didn’t give in to Biden’s demand
Posted by TigerBandTuba
Member since Sep 2006
2552 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 8:58 am to
I'm like 8 boosters deep, how long do I have??
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
68079 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 8:59 am to

Freaking Warp Speed 2020.

Thanks, Fauci, Trump and Strannix .
Posted by canyon
MM23
Member since Dec 2003
19120 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:01 am to
Fake news
see Travis Swift for more exciting news
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
12970 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:02 am to
Nobody was forced to get it
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
170243 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:13 am to
NY Post: COVID vaccines linked to slight increases in heart, brain, blood disorders



quote:

COVID vaccines from companies like Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca have been linked to rare occurrences of heart, brain, and blood disorders, according to the largest vaccine study to date.

Researchers from the Global Vaccine Data Network analyzed 99 million people who received jabs in eight countries and monitored for increases in 13 medical conditions, Bloomberg News reported.

The study, which was published in the journal Vaccine last week, found that the vaccines were linked to a slight spike in neurological, blood, and heart-related medical conditions.

Rare cases of myocarditis — inflammation of the heart muscle — were found in the first, second, and third doses of Pfizer-BioNTech’s and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines.

Another heart condition, ?pericarditis, the inflammation of the cardiac muscle, had a 6.9-fold increased risk in those who received a third dose of AstraZeneca’s viral-vector shot, the study found.

Meanwhile, a first and fourth dose of Moderna’s jab had a 1.7-fold and 2.6-fold increased risk, respectively.

An increased risk also was identified of a type of blood clot in the brain from viral-vector shot such as the one developed by the University of Oxford and manufactured by AstraZeneca, Bloomberg said.

There was a 2.5 times greater risk of developing Guillain-Barre syndrome, a rare neurological disorder in which the immune system attacks the nerves, among people who received AstraZeneca’s jab, according to the study.

Possible safety signals for ?transverse myelitis, a spinal cord inflammation, were identified after viral-vector vaccines, as was acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, the inflammation and swelling in the brain and spinal cord, after both viral-vector and mRNA vaccines, the researchers found.

The experts at GVDV in New Zealand — a research arm of the World Health Organization – examined 13 medical conditions that they considered “adverse events of special interest” among the subjects, aiming to identify higher-than-expected cases after a vaccine.

More than 13.5 billion doses have been administered worldwide since the start of the pandemic. A small proportion of those immunized were harmed by the shots, stoking debate about the benefits of the jabs versus the risks.

“The size of the population in this study increased the possibility of identifying rare potential vaccine safety signals,” lead author Kristýna Faksová of the Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut in Denmark, said in a release.
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 9:15 am
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
2952 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:14 am to
Notice how it said “rare events”, meaning that the majority of people won’t have any problems from the vaccine. You anti-vax people and your antics are hilarious.
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 9:17 am
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
19044 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:24 am to
Excellent study. It's a massive sample size and shows the difference between the Oxford vaccine (more prone to neurological and hematologic adverse effects) and the mRNA ones like Pfizer and Moderna (more prone to cardiovascular adverse effects). Of course the caveat, as noted in the results, is that the observed vs expected ratio (OE) has to be compared to infection to get an idea of the risk:
quote:

Moreover, overall risk–benefit evaluations of vaccination should take the risk associated with infection into account, as multiple studies demonstrated higher risk of developing the events under study, such as GBS, myocarditis, or ADEM, following SARS-CoV-2 infection than vaccination



For example, for the most part the OE ratio on the vaccines are somewhere between 0.9 (excellent) and 2.5 (meh); compared to one study where they found infection comes with a 617x increased chance of an adverse effect:
quote:

Frontera et al. [46] concluded that chances of having a neurological event following acute SARS-CoV-2 infection were up to 617-fold higher than following COVID vaccination, suggesting that the benefits of vaccination substantially outweigh the risks.


Also it looks like they studied 0-40 days after vaccination for the most part. That means we're not sitting around 3 years later expecting people to drop dead from blood clots

Overall, a really good study.
Posted by 225Tyga
Member since Oct 2013
16378 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:25 am to
Could have saved a lot of money and i could have told you that was the case...


I didnt get the jab

Best decision ever
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 9:25 am
Posted by JimTiger72
Member since Jun 2023
7112 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:26 am to
Here come all the posters who got the vaccine telling you they are fine. It’s statistics. 95% of people will be fine.

Others might have had cardiac issues, blood clots, cancer, etc

ETA:
quote:

It’s statistics. 95% of people will be fine.

You could say the same for Covid.

Both(virus & vaccine) were created in a lab, so I guess they got what they wanted both times
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 11:03 am
Posted by RedPants
GA
Member since Jan 2013
5521 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:28 am to
Am I a half-blood if I got the J&J? Trying to use the correct Harry Potter terminology.
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17235 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:33 am to
"Pureblood checking in."

-Beau, 43, St. Francisville, 287lb, taking Ozempic
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
20373 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:36 am to
My dong got 2" longer after getting vaccinated.


Posted by idsrdum
Member since Jan 2017
482 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:41 am to
Here is a LINK to the study.

Note - this paper is brought to you by the same people who recommend Covid-19 vaccination for 6 month old babies.
quote:

Funding statement

The GCoVS project is supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of a financial assistance award totaling US$10,108,491 with 100 % per cent funded by CDC/HHS.
Posted by ShermanTxTiger
Broussard, La
Member since Oct 2007
11009 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:49 am to
Sheeple....

The pure bloods tried to warn and were mocked, scoffed and treated like Jews in 1940's Poland.

Best decision I ever made was rejecting this treatment. I wasn't anti jab until the pressure to get it ramped up. Then, I dug my heels in.
Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
8247 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 10:06 am to
We also now know that up to 40% received a placebo. They ran a case study on an entire population.
Posted by schwartzy
New Orleans
Member since May 2014
9154 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 10:11 am to
It was really wrong to make young college students who had Covid and recovered on their own through their own immune system to be forced to take unproven shots. It makes no sense to vaccinate for a disease that one already had and recovered from.

I wasn't forced, but I was coerced to get the shot. If I didn't, there was a good chance my medical school acceptance may have been revoked in favor of someone else who didn't mind getting the shot. The narrative at the time was "get vaccinated, trust the science, save grandma, etc."
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 10:13 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram