- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Largest study yet links COVID vaccine to adverse health effects
Posted on 2/20/24 at 8:52 am
Posted on 2/20/24 at 8:52 am
Bloomberg
Forcing people to get a brand new vaccine linked to ”surprising” adverse outcomes. Who ever could have guessed such a thing.
I was never anti-vaccine (but I got the old school J&J one) and I think they were a lifesaver for countless people who were more at-risk for whatever reason. But trying to force it on everyone was one of the most bizarre and unsettling things I’ve seen.
quote:
The rare events — identified early in the pandemic — included a higher risk of heart-related inflammation from mRNA shots made by Pfizer Inc., BioNTech SE, and Moderna Inc., and an increased risk of a type of blood clot in the brain after immunization with viral-vector vaccines such as the one developed by the University of Oxford and made by AstraZeneca Plc.
Forcing people to get a brand new vaccine linked to ”surprising” adverse outcomes. Who ever could have guessed such a thing.
I was never anti-vaccine (but I got the old school J&J one) and I think they were a lifesaver for countless people who were more at-risk for whatever reason. But trying to force it on everyone was one of the most bizarre and unsettling things I’ve seen.
Posted on 2/20/24 at 8:53 am to FutureCorridor49
Is this why my a-hole has been itching?
Posted on 2/20/24 at 8:55 am to FutureCorridor49
Pureblood checking in
Posted on 2/20/24 at 8:56 am to FutureCorridor49
Thankfully I’m a pureblood. I didn’t give in to Biden’s demand
Posted on 2/20/24 at 8:58 am to FutureCorridor49
I'm like 8 boosters deep, how long do I have??
Posted on 2/20/24 at 8:59 am to FutureCorridor49
Freaking Warp Speed 2020.
Thanks, Fauci, Trump and Strannix .
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:01 am to FutureCorridor49
Fake news
see Travis Swift for more exciting news
see Travis Swift for more exciting news
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:02 am to FutureCorridor49
Nobody was forced to get it
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:13 am to FutureCorridor49
NY Post: COVID vaccines linked to slight increases in heart, brain, blood disorders
quote:
COVID vaccines from companies like Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca have been linked to rare occurrences of heart, brain, and blood disorders, according to the largest vaccine study to date.
Researchers from the Global Vaccine Data Network analyzed 99 million people who received jabs in eight countries and monitored for increases in 13 medical conditions, Bloomberg News reported.
The study, which was published in the journal Vaccine last week, found that the vaccines were linked to a slight spike in neurological, blood, and heart-related medical conditions.
Rare cases of myocarditis — inflammation of the heart muscle — were found in the first, second, and third doses of Pfizer-BioNTech’s and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines.
Another heart condition, ?pericarditis, the inflammation of the cardiac muscle, had a 6.9-fold increased risk in those who received a third dose of AstraZeneca’s viral-vector shot, the study found.
Meanwhile, a first and fourth dose of Moderna’s jab had a 1.7-fold and 2.6-fold increased risk, respectively.
An increased risk also was identified of a type of blood clot in the brain from viral-vector shot such as the one developed by the University of Oxford and manufactured by AstraZeneca, Bloomberg said.
There was a 2.5 times greater risk of developing Guillain-Barre syndrome, a rare neurological disorder in which the immune system attacks the nerves, among people who received AstraZeneca’s jab, according to the study.
Possible safety signals for ?transverse myelitis, a spinal cord inflammation, were identified after viral-vector vaccines, as was acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, the inflammation and swelling in the brain and spinal cord, after both viral-vector and mRNA vaccines, the researchers found.
The experts at GVDV in New Zealand — a research arm of the World Health Organization – examined 13 medical conditions that they considered “adverse events of special interest” among the subjects, aiming to identify higher-than-expected cases after a vaccine.
More than 13.5 billion doses have been administered worldwide since the start of the pandemic. A small proportion of those immunized were harmed by the shots, stoking debate about the benefits of the jabs versus the risks.
“The size of the population in this study increased the possibility of identifying rare potential vaccine safety signals,” lead author Kristýna Faksová of the Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut in Denmark, said in a release.
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 9:15 am
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:14 am to FutureCorridor49
Notice how it said “rare events”, meaning that the majority of people won’t have any problems from the vaccine. You anti-vax people and your antics are hilarious.
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 9:17 am
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:24 am to FutureCorridor49
Excellent study. It's a massive sample size and shows the difference between the Oxford vaccine (more prone to neurological and hematologic adverse effects) and the mRNA ones like Pfizer and Moderna (more prone to cardiovascular adverse effects). Of course the caveat, as noted in the results, is that the observed vs expected ratio (OE) has to be compared to infection to get an idea of the risk:
For example, for the most part the OE ratio on the vaccines are somewhere between 0.9 (excellent) and 2.5 (meh); compared to one study where they found infection comes with a 617x increased chance of an adverse effect:
Also it looks like they studied 0-40 days after vaccination for the most part. That means we're not sitting around 3 years later expecting people to drop dead from blood clots
Overall, a really good study.
quote:
Moreover, overall risk–benefit evaluations of vaccination should take the risk associated with infection into account, as multiple studies demonstrated higher risk of developing the events under study, such as GBS, myocarditis, or ADEM, following SARS-CoV-2 infection than vaccination
For example, for the most part the OE ratio on the vaccines are somewhere between 0.9 (excellent) and 2.5 (meh); compared to one study where they found infection comes with a 617x increased chance of an adverse effect:
quote:
Frontera et al. [46] concluded that chances of having a neurological event following acute SARS-CoV-2 infection were up to 617-fold higher than following COVID vaccination, suggesting that the benefits of vaccination substantially outweigh the risks.
Also it looks like they studied 0-40 days after vaccination for the most part. That means we're not sitting around 3 years later expecting people to drop dead from blood clots
Overall, a really good study.
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:25 am to FutureCorridor49
Could have saved a lot of money and i could have told you that was the case...
I didnt get the jab
Best decision ever
I didnt get the jab
Best decision ever
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 9:25 am
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:26 am to FutureCorridor49
Here come all the posters who got the vaccine telling you they are fine. It’s statistics. 95% of people will be fine.
Others might have had cardiac issues, blood clots, cancer, etc
ETA:
You could say the same for Covid.
Both(virus & vaccine) were created in a lab, so I guess they got what they wanted both times
Others might have had cardiac issues, blood clots, cancer, etc
ETA:
quote:
It’s statistics. 95% of people will be fine.
You could say the same for Covid.
Both(virus & vaccine) were created in a lab, so I guess they got what they wanted both times
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 11:03 am
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:28 am to FutureCorridor49
Am I a half-blood if I got the J&J? Trying to use the correct Harry Potter terminology.
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:33 am to FutureCorridor49
"Pureblood checking in."
-Beau, 43, St. Francisville, 287lb, taking Ozempic
-Beau, 43, St. Francisville, 287lb, taking Ozempic
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:36 am to FutureCorridor49
My dong got 2" longer after getting vaccinated.
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:41 am to FutureCorridor49
Here is a LINK to the study.
Note - this paper is brought to you by the same people who recommend Covid-19 vaccination for 6 month old babies.
Note - this paper is brought to you by the same people who recommend Covid-19 vaccination for 6 month old babies.
quote:
Funding statement
The GCoVS project is supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of a financial assistance award totaling US$10,108,491 with 100 % per cent funded by CDC/HHS.
Posted on 2/20/24 at 9:49 am to FutureCorridor49
Sheeple....
The pure bloods tried to warn and were mocked, scoffed and treated like Jews in 1940's Poland.
Best decision I ever made was rejecting this treatment. I wasn't anti jab until the pressure to get it ramped up. Then, I dug my heels in.
The pure bloods tried to warn and were mocked, scoffed and treated like Jews in 1940's Poland.
Best decision I ever made was rejecting this treatment. I wasn't anti jab until the pressure to get it ramped up. Then, I dug my heels in.
Posted on 2/20/24 at 10:06 am to FutureCorridor49
We also now know that up to 40% received a placebo. They ran a case study on an entire population.
Posted on 2/20/24 at 10:11 am to FutureCorridor49
It was really wrong to make young college students who had Covid and recovered on their own through their own immune system to be forced to take unproven shots. It makes no sense to vaccinate for a disease that one already had and recovered from.
I wasn't forced, but I was coerced to get the shot. If I didn't, there was a good chance my medical school acceptance may have been revoked in favor of someone else who didn't mind getting the shot. The narrative at the time was "get vaccinated, trust the science, save grandma, etc."
I wasn't forced, but I was coerced to get the shot. If I didn't, there was a good chance my medical school acceptance may have been revoked in favor of someone else who didn't mind getting the shot. The narrative at the time was "get vaccinated, trust the science, save grandma, etc."
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 10:13 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News