re: 2020 election was a CIA and FBI operation

I can remember when the PT board was considered to be more intellectual slice of the tiger droppings pie. Then the MAGA brigade took it over. Sad!

quote:

---

can remember when the PT board was considered to be more intellectual slice of the tiger droppings pie. Then the MAGA brigade took it over. Sad!

---

Wisconsin has the clearest statistical case for fraud.

There are multiple areas with greater than 100% of eligible voters voting. (They have far more registered voters than eligible voters.)

Hell, the entire state had over 90% of registered voters “vote.”

They facilitated illegal voting. They dismissed their own processes.

The election commission gave illegal guidance to their precincts to change how to process ballots that needed to be cured.

Zuckerberg threw millions of dollars at the largest Democratic strongholds to “GOTV” (that’s code for fraud on the Democrat side).

Illegal early voting was allowed.

Someone could write a 1,000 page book on the Wisconsin 2020 Presidential election.

It’s the easiest case for procedural fraud of all the states.

quote:

---

hunters laptop was kept hidden by the FBI for 10 months and when it eventually and miraculously came out by sheer luck, the entire fedgov and compromised media/social media machine came out in force to create an entire narrative that it was fake. 3 years later there not a soul alive that still believes that.

---

Nice whataboutism. Hunter's laptop has nothing to do with the claim that the FBI, CIA colluded with the NYT and CBS to hide the "steal" evidence.

Yes, Hunter's laptop was part of the election cycle but not directly related to the claims made about ballot mules and changed votes that so many of you claim.

quote:

---

Nice whataboutism. Hunter's laptop has nothing to do with the claim that the FBI, CIA colluded with the NYT and CBS to hide the "steal" evidence.

---

its a perfect example of a pretty extensive conspiracy that you

quote:

---

That is an awful lot of people to be in on the conspiracy.

---

apparently dismiss because of the sheer number of people required. So to directly respond to your post.. the size of the conspiracy isn't some default evidence against it occurring. In the laptop case, it was vast and successful and it was all lies. Sorry that is difficult for you to swallow but there it is

After the shock of the "sure to win" Hillary loss, the dems blatantly tripled down on every avenue of cheating and fraud they had and came up with new ones too.

Biden probably got fewer real votes than the 65,853,516 Hillary did in 2016.

quote:

---

Reputable news sources like WSJ

---

You mean the War Street Journal? Did you just crawl out from under a rock?



In the lead-up to the Bush Regime’s 2003 invasion of Iraq, the WSJ’s editorial page editor Paul Gigot was promoting the delusional narrative that ousting Saddam and importing American style ”dEmOcrazy” to Iraq would bring stability to the region.

Gigot likewise promoted the wholly fabricated Deep State narrative that Saddam was pursuing a nuclear weapons program.




If Saddam Survives: The world will be a chaotic place if Bush doesn't liberate Iraq….


Yes, all of this is a worst-case scenario, but surely many of these setbacks would follow Saddam's survival in Iraq. Like it or not, the U.S. is today the enforcer of world order, and if its credibility and will are in doubt the forces of global anarchy will be unleashed. No one is ignoring the risks of war. But at this late stage, and having committed so much prestige to disarming Saddam, the U.S. failure to liberate Iraq will produce the very chaos that the opponents of war say they fear.

Yes, U.N. inspectors might still be searching the Iraqi countryside for a "smoking gun," but everyone will understand that Saddam stood down a U.S. President. America's armed forces couldn't stay massed in the Mideast forever, and so the mobilization of January 2003 is reversed. Far from a coup against Saddam, the dictator consolidates his power with one more purge of his officer corps. His spies assassinate key members of the Iraqi opposition in the Kurdish areas of northern Iraq.

Savoring their new global clout, the French begin to argue that the inspectors have found nothing and so U.N. Resolution 1441 has been fulfilled. The Russians back them up, hoping to get repaid on their loans to Baghdad. Tony--or "Toady" as he is now derided--Blair is toppled as Labor Party leader and British Prime Minister. Slowly the international "containment" of Saddam begins to erode, just as it did in the 1990s. The Iraqi dictator finds it even easier to finance his nuclear weapons project….

Pessimistic Liberalism….

With the Pentagon declaring the end of “major combat” in Iraq, most Americans are responding with relief and pride. Our troops have performed with skill, courage and even honorable restraint in deposing a dictator half a world away in less than a month. The puzzle is why some Americans, especially media and liberal elites, continue to wallow in pessimism about this liberation.

Two weeks ago these elites were predicting a long war with horrific casualties and global damage. Then at the sight of Iraqis cheering U.S. troops in Baghdad, they quickly moved on to fret about “looting” and “anarchy.” Now that those are subsiding, our pessimists have rushed to worry that Iraqi democracy and reconstruction will be all but impossible. What is it that liberals find so dismaying about the prospect of American success?

quote:

---

“Possession is 9/10 the law” theory and co-opting the media and other agencies to intimidate those who might look into the subject matter.

---

Don't forget the threats of burning down the country using their terrorist ANTIFA and BLM storm troopers.

quote:

---

Of course, I am equally baffled about how the board’s resident stoners more often than not white-knight for Police State policies.

---

I usually ignore them because they are just trying to be contrarian, but sometimes their dumbassery is too much to let slide.