- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/22/24 at 5:45 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
quote:
I am blaming the SCOTUS for fricking ignoring the Constitution
SCOTUS hasn’t heard the merits of this case
Did Article IV, Section 4 get deleted from the Constitution when I wasn't looking?
Posted on 1/22/24 at 5:45 pm to Fun Bunch
It’s time for Texas to send tens of thousands of immigrants to DC/ No Va./Maryland generally and the five judge’s neighborhoods specifically. They can not continue to live uninterrupted in their enclaves while Texans have to deal with it daily.literally unload the buses on their front yards and let them live in the neighborhood parks in tent cities.every SINGLE immigrant should now be headed to one geographic destination.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 5:48 pm to udtiger
quote:
Did Article IV, Section 4 get deleted from the Constitution when I wasn't looking?
4.4 doesn’t change the fact that SCOTUS hasn’t heard the merits of the case.
The only thing SCOTUS did today was lift the 5th circuit injunction on legal grounds. One shouldn’t extrapolate anything from that beyond the fact that SCOTUS is deferring to current law in finding that TX cannot state a likelihood of success on the merits (because of said current law)
SCOTUS couldn’t really rule differently until SCOTUS hears the merits and changes the law.
This post was edited on 1/22/24 at 5:51 pm
Posted on 1/22/24 at 5:51 pm to Indefatigable
All the more reason Abbot should just ignore them.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 5:52 pm to udtiger
No disagreement there. I’m just trying to provide context into the Court’s process. Because the vitriol currently is in the wrong place.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 5:53 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
It’s time for Texas to send tens of thousands of immigrants to DC/ No Va./Maryland generally and the five judge’s neighborhoods specifically. They can not continue to live uninterrupted in their enclaves while Texans have to deal with it daily.literally unload the buses on their front yards and let them live in the neighborhood parks in tent cities.every SINGLE immigrant should now be headed to one geographic destination.
Don't forget Martha's Vineyard, The Haptons etc
Posted on 1/22/24 at 5:55 pm to EKG
quote:
I hate to point out the obvious … but Roberts is a dude.
Supposedly, anyway.
frick both of ‘em.
Robert's controls ACB.
This post was edited on 1/22/24 at 5:56 pm
Posted on 1/22/24 at 5:55 pm to udtiger
He will
Posted on 1/22/24 at 5:58 pm to Godfather1
quote:
quote:
Catholic Church wants more immigrants from Catholic countries.
And that is what drives ACB’s ruling.
But Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Alito are also Catholic. Either you are that stupid or just hate Catholics.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 5:59 pm to udtiger
quote:
Abbot should refuse.
Period.
It's time to get this the frick over with.
"They've made their decision, now let them enforce it." moment
Posted on 1/22/24 at 6:01 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
No disagreement there. I’m just trying to provide context into the Court’s process. Because the vitriol currently is in the wrong place
I disagree. I know all about how they work.
They are limited by themselves. They could have ruled differently and the fact they did not tells you how they will rule.on the merits.
Whatever. The Taney Court started the first one. Roberts will have the honor of ushering in the second one.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 6:04 pm to MrLSU
quote:
Catholic Charities and the other archdiocese affiliated groups are in favor of open borders. She always votes with the Church and always has.
100 percent correct. No one should be surprised if they pay attention
Posted on 1/22/24 at 6:05 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:Remember this ruling when they rule Jan 6 was an insurrection. The Biden admin is working to subvert US law. And it’s being allowed openly.
Roberts and ACB with the libs.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 6:06 pm to Zephyrius
quote:
But Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Alito are also Catholic. Either you are that stupid or just hate Catholics
None of them wear their Catholicism on their sleeve the way ACB does. None of them are driven by their religion.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 6:10 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
SCOTUS couldn’t really rule differently until SCOTUS hears the merits and changes the law
SCOTUS can’t change law…
I get your overall point. But I feel like you leave injunctions in place until you decide the merits. I don’t see any harm in leaving the injunction for now.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 6:11 pm to GoblinGuide
quote:Yes, and its just as feminine. Christianity was much more masculine in the past.
Would you describe the urge to help as Christian as well?
There are a ton of both Catholic and Protestant groups at the border that assist these border crossings.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 6:11 pm to udtiger
quote:
the fact they did not tells you how they will rule.on the merits.
Their job is to interpret current law. Not to enact policy, set things right, or do what “should” be done.
Your issue lies with Congress.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 6:11 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Their job is to interpret current law. Not to enact policy, set things right, or do what “should” be done.
We need to take entire stadiums full of lawyers and set them on fire.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 6:12 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Their job is to interpret current law. Not to enact policy, set things right, or do what “should” be done.
Obergfell and Sebelius say otherwise.
Page 9 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News