Started By
Message

Private equity ownership of hospitals made care riskier for patients, a new study finds

Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:20 am
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50569 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:20 am
LINK

quote:

CNN

Health care became more hazardous for patients at hospitals purchased by private equity firms, a new study shows.

The sweeping study, which was published Tuesday in the journal JAMA, looked at the rates of 10 serious adverse events associated with medical care at 51 hospitals before and after they were purchased by private equity firms — a financing model designed to make money for investors. The researchers then compared those results with the rates of the same complications at 259 hospitals that were not owned by private equity firms.

Private equity firms have been acquiring large chunks of the US health care delivery system in recent years. In addition to hospitals, those acquisitions include nursing homes, behavioral health systems, and private physician practices. Academic research has shown that private equity ownership is associated with higher death rates for patients in nursing homes and increased costs to taxpayers. Earlier this month, the Senate Budget Committee announced its bipartisan investigation of the impact of private equity purchases on health care facilities.

Many of these complications are designated “never events” because they’re preventable medical errors that should never occur during routine care, such as leaving a foreign object in the body after surgery, failing to correctly match a patient’s blood type, falls, infections at certain kinds of surgical sites or where doctors insert catheters or central lines, blood clots after joint replacement surgeries and pressure sores.

Researchers said they did the study because, while there has been some evidence to show the economic outcomes after private equity firms purchase hospitals, such as increased billing rates, there’s been little understanding of how this business model may impact patient care.

The study found that rates of hospital-acquired complications for patients increased by 25% at hospitals after they were purchased by private equity firms.

Study author Dr. Zirui Song said the increase was driven by a 27% increase in falls, which tend to happen on the general floors of the hospital; a 38% increase in central line infections, which are associated with ICU care; and a doubling of the rates of surgical site infections.

The increase in central line infections happened despite private equity-owned hospitals inserting about 16% fewer central lines — ports into large veins that are surgically implanted in patients who need regular intravenous medication, food or fluids.

“In all three so-called layers of the hospital, from the general floors to the ICUs to the operating rooms, we saw a quite striking and concerning average change,” said Song, who is an associate professor at Harvard Medical School, in an interview with JAMA editors.

Experts who have been tracking the impact of private equity ownership in health care called the findings “stunning.”

“I have to say that the number is even higher than than what I expected,” said Eileen O’Grady, who is the health care research and campaigns director for the Private Equity Stakeholder Project, which aims to hold private equity groups accountable.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
21632 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:27 am to
People are going to confuse these with property tax paying hospitals like HCA really quick.
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
9142 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:36 am to
quote:

The researchers then compared those results with the rates of the same complications at 259 hospitals that were not owned by private equity firms.


Who were they owned by?
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50569 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:49 am to
quote:

Who were they owned by?


Themselves? Ochsner owns Ochsner, for example.

Maybe I’m misunderstanding something?
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50569 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:52 am to
This is an interesting rabbit hole.

PESP Private Equity Hospital Tracker
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
8114 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:11 am to
My faith in all hospitals these days is about zero. Hospitals are where you go to die.
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
9524 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:19 am to
If only the government was in charge of the hospitals, everything would run much smoother, right?
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50569 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:20 am to
If you say so.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141604 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:23 am to
4chubbies needs to get back in the kitchen and make some abortion cakes for the hobo she puts out for.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71800 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:27 am to
You vote(D) for this.

The Walmartization of healthcare was a direct result of Obamacare.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50569 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:43 am to
quote:

You vote(D) for this.


How? If anything, Democrats pretend to want universal healthcare, not Walmart healthcare.

But who did I vote for that caused or encouraged or allowed private equity firms to purchase essentials like housing and hospitals?
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50569 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:47 am to
quote:

The Walmartization of healthcare was a direct result of capitalism.


Profits are king in our economic system. We are experiencing the natural consequences of crony capitalism.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15090 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:50 am to
I don't see how Obamacare had/has anything to do with this trend. It's happening all over industries, from hospitals to radio stations to hardware stores.
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
2351 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:50 am to
quote:

4cubbies


Just out of curiousity, would you consider yourself a socialist?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68953 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:53 am to
quote:

Profits are king in our economic system. We are experiencing the natural consequences of crony capitalism.


Money is an efficient and objective measure of success of human activity.

But it doesn't measure if the activity is ethical.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50569 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:55 am to
No. Our economic system isn’t perfect. We don’t have to pretend it is. I’m not perfect either but I don’t hate myself. We have perverted capitalism into something that benefits the few at the expense of the many.

I’m posting from my phone so I’m not really in a position to write a more thoughtful and thorough response, but this is at least something.
Posted by WylieTiger
Member since Nov 2006
13161 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:58 am to
It doesn't matter who owns what. We are all monetized as patients by the insurance companies and big pharma. They have set the playing field with which clinicians have to operate from. Their goal is to not get you better but to keep you in the system for maximum profit. Couple that with poor dietary/lifestyle habits across the board and you have a system that produces maximum profits but does not improve life expectancy. It's all a scam when looking at it in those terms.

Think about post op surgery patients that require an overnight stay. Advancements over the years in techniques and treatments have greatly reduced overnight stays, most likely because insurance has reduced the amount of time that they will cover the cost (or a portion of it). Chicken or egg. Hospitals adapted, improved, and reduced stays. This is turn opens the bed for the next patient. Increased volumes, increases revenue.

Insurance companies now love the ASC model and hospitals are taking note buying up surgery centers. Easier money there.

Sure, there are advances and cures out there and clinicians improve and fix things on an individual basis but think about your grandparents. Did they go to the doctor or specialist 25 times per year? Think about your elderly parents and how often they go to the doctor. It's copay after copay, specialist after specialist. Insurance premiums increase every year. Think about the number of medical facilities in your area now versus 30 years ago. Life expectancy is still the same or worse. Something is amiss.

They want your money and want to time it to where you become the governments problem after they get the maximum from you.
This post was edited on 12/31/23 at 8:13 am
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49168 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:01 am to
4Commies
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124712 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:02 am to
quote:

If only the government was in charge of the hospitals
They don't want to be in charge quite yet. First, they need to further degrade our existing system. A perfect example is the Feds banning physician-owned hospitals, while opening the doors for the OP's PE profiteering groups.

Our Feds did the same thing with health insurance. The ACA was designed to fail. Hillary was to save us with communized medicine. She lost, and we ended up stuck with ACA shite for an insurance system. So, since its """cost-savings""" inception, the ACA has conservatively added >$1T to the debt.

At some point a Hillary Marxist protege will try to swoop in and "save medicine" by Communizing it. But, to get there they've got to regulate things to the point private systems break, or rot in a festering cesspool.
This post was edited on 12/31/23 at 8:03 am
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68953 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:04 am to
quote:

since its """cost-savings""" inception, the ACA has conservatively added >$1T to the debt.



Too bad nobody predicted that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram