Started By
Message

Soft landing: Did the Fed really somehow achieve the impossible?

Posted on 12/16/23 at 6:13 pm
Posted by euphemus
Member since Mar 2014
536 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 6:13 pm
How did JPow and crew pull off such a heist? The All-in podcast besties were convinced that we would have a hard landing and a severe recession for almost a year now. Even billionaires seemingly with a finger on the pulse got it wrong.
This post was edited on 12/16/23 at 6:58 pm
Posted by BHTiger
Charleston
Member since Dec 2017
5072 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 6:59 pm to
Did the govt spending slow down? It will be a hard landing m, it is just a matter of time.
Posted by jimjackandjose
Member since Jun 2011
6498 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 7:05 pm to
A bag of potato chips is 6 bucks

If that's soft landing, then frick me sideways
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40723 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 7:26 pm to
Idk if this answers your question but it feels like they are just pulling some of this economic data out of their arse each week.
Posted by thatguy777
br
Member since Feb 2007
2386 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 7:41 pm to
The fed didn’t get it perfect, obviously, but I think they did a good job. Probably should’ve started raising rates sooner than they did. Soft landing incoming
Posted by Drizzt
Cimmeria
Member since Aug 2013
12936 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 7:45 pm to
We have given $75 billion to Ukraine which is pumped directly to defense contractors and into the economy. The government still has the money faucet on full blasts. If the money ever ends, we have a really hard landing. It’s unsustainable.
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24185 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 7:48 pm to
The before and after long term price impacts of COV era will be studied for years. They waited too long to raise rates and then raised them too quickly but the net effect doesn’t seem much different. Generally, it’s being managed “okay” albeit I think 2024 is a tough economic year.
Posted by kaaj24
Dallas
Member since Jan 2010
620 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 7:52 pm to
Hard to believe government reports around economic data.
Posted by ItzMe1972
Member since Dec 2013
9824 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 8:19 pm to
Paused the inflation fight till after the 2024 election.
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24185 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 8:43 pm to
Nah, inflation is slowing down…just not to 2% yet.

The bigger issue is they are going to create unemployment issues eventually in their pursuit of 2%.
Posted by Thundercles
Mars
Member since Sep 2010
5099 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 8:57 pm to
In past big market dips the dip occurred months after the Fed pivots. Meaning the Fed pausing rate hikes or not cutting doesn't mean we're out of the woods. Not enough data to know if that's a coincidence or not, but if history repeats itself we are 5-10 months from the potential pain.

In September 2007 the Fed cut rates and did so fast, In October 2007 the market peaked then held steady until June 2008 when the crash started and bottomed in March 2009.

In 2000 it was less pronounced but happened four months after the Fed cut rates.

So in the last two rough recessions Fed pausing rate hikes and then cutting rates were followed by massive market dips. I certainly hope we can dodge it this time.

LINK
Posted by Shamoan
Member since Feb 2019
9289 posts
Posted on 12/16/23 at 10:16 pm to
I stand in awe that we aren’t in a cratering economy. I blame the stupid of the American populace that our addiction to spending (even against our best interests) will pull up out of this quagmire. Our ignorance might save us from doing the responsible thing.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85136 posts
Posted on 12/17/23 at 5:08 am to
quote:

We have given $75 billion to Ukraine which is pumped directly to defense contractors and into the economy. The government still has the money faucet on full blasts. If the money ever ends, we have a really hard landing. It’s unsustainable.



The Ukraine is such a red herring though. I don’t support the money we’re spending there, but it’s so insignificant from government spending standpoint it’s irrelevant for any discussion purposes.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85136 posts
Posted on 12/17/23 at 5:22 am to
quote:

A bag of potato chips is 6 bucks

If that's soft landing, then frick me sideways


Do you really want chips to go back to $2 a bag (a price that hasn’t existed as the average in this country since 1980)?

Do you know what that likely means for this economy? I’m not sure why some people on this board seem to think prices going down is good for the economy.

The price for a bag of chips settling in at $6 and staying around there for the next few years is a symptom of a soft landing.
Posted by I Love Bama
Alabama
Member since Nov 2007
37732 posts
Posted on 12/17/23 at 5:37 am to
Market is pricing in 5 or 6 rate cuts next year. Think about that objectively. In my opinion, that means something broke.

If that happens, does inflation come roaring back?

I have to think so.
This post was edited on 12/17/23 at 5:38 am
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
7496 posts
Posted on 12/17/23 at 7:30 am to
If the game plan on the soft landing included high inflation, then maybe
Posted by fjlee90
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2016
7850 posts
Posted on 12/17/23 at 8:15 am to
Things look like they’re trending well. Until you look at consumer debt. Feels like the average American has decided to prop this economy up on credit.
Posted by jimjackandjose
Member since Jun 2011
6498 posts
Posted on 12/17/23 at 10:17 am to
Slackster

Yes. Cheap good while companies profit margins aren't exploding is best for the 95% of Americans who aren't millionaires on boards or able to take advantage of stock market wildness.

Balance between cost of goods and wages is critical. Cost of goods doubling when wages haven't gone up but maybe 15% over the same time period is bad for everyone but the super rich.

Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51795 posts
Posted on 12/17/23 at 11:04 am to
quote:

How did JPow and crew pull off such a heist? The All-in podcast besties were convinced that we would have a hard landing and a severe recession for almost a year now. Even billionaires seemingly with a finger on the pulse got it wrong.




Your stance is foundationally flawed as we haven't landed yet. We're still just circling the runway.

One of the best predictors we have of an incoming recession is the inverted yield curve. Once the yield curve moves back to normal behavior, we get either more inversion or a recession within the next 6-12 months. Every. Single. Time.



When the red line (shorter-term bonds) is above the blue line (longer-term bonds), that's the warning sign. We've been in an inverted curve environment for over a year and a half now. There's no known correlation between depth and/or length of inversion to the strength and/or length of the proceeding recession. What there is correlation about though is that a recession will happen (if not, this would be the first time it did not happen).

Another counter to your stance comes from the continued high inflation (which now appears to be sticky at 3%, 4% for Core CPI) while real wages have barely risen since pre-COVID. Along with that, consumers seem to have been trying to offset inflation on the backs of their credit cards, cards with rates higher than we've seen in decades. To underscore how big of a problem that is, we've seen credit card delinquencies shooting upward for two years now with no end in sight.

Now you may be thinking "but GDP has been so strong". Has it? GDP is a measure of money spent, not units sold. Real GDP has grown only 1.3% from Q2-Q3 of this year while growing only 3% YoY. During those same periods consumer credit card debt grew by 2% and 10.2% (respectively).

So with all that said, is this really a "soft landing" or just wishful thinking?
This post was edited on 12/17/23 at 11:08 am
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85136 posts
Posted on 12/17/23 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Yes. Cheap good while companies profit margins aren't exploding is best for the 95% of Americans who aren't millionaires on boards or able to take advantage of stock market wildness. Balance between cost of goods and wages is critical. Cost of goods doubling when wages haven't gone up but maybe 15% over the same time period is bad for everyone but the super rich.


But there is a difference between chips going up slowly - as we all wish they would have - and chips falling meaningfully from current prices. The latter probably means very bad things.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram