- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

The Constitution puts democracy at risk
Posted on 9/18/23 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 9/18/23 at 1:22 pm
these people simply hate America
thissss is CNN
CNN Gets Roasted for Absurd Chyron Warning Constitution is 'Outdated, Puts Democracy at Risk'
Poll: Do you think the Constitution of the United States is outdated and puts democracy at risk?
The few remaining viewers of CNN got a remarkable dose of news on Saturday. Just in time for Constitution Day, CNN's dwindling audience learned that the Consitution of the United States -- the oldest written government charter in the world and the document that gave birth to the nation that has spread democracy around the globe -- has become so "outdated" that it's actually a "threat to democracy." Of course, that's democracy as CNN's scholars understand it. And you can't spell ignorance without "C-N-N." The word came on "Newsroom," anchored by former CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta. Acosta interviewed two Harvard professors of government who are of the opinion that the grand system of compromise, checks and balances devised by the Founders in Philadelphia in 1787 is as obsolete as the quill pens they used to write it down. Accompanying the interview was a chyron at the bottom of the screen declaring (in all caps): "Scholars Warn Outdated Constitution Has Put Democracy At Risk." And it was scorched on social media:
LINK
thissss is CNN
CNN Gets Roasted for Absurd Chyron Warning Constitution is 'Outdated, Puts Democracy at Risk'
Poll: Do you think the Constitution of the United States is outdated and puts democracy at risk?
The few remaining viewers of CNN got a remarkable dose of news on Saturday. Just in time for Constitution Day, CNN's dwindling audience learned that the Consitution of the United States -- the oldest written government charter in the world and the document that gave birth to the nation that has spread democracy around the globe -- has become so "outdated" that it's actually a "threat to democracy." Of course, that's democracy as CNN's scholars understand it. And you can't spell ignorance without "C-N-N." The word came on "Newsroom," anchored by former CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta. Acosta interviewed two Harvard professors of government who are of the opinion that the grand system of compromise, checks and balances devised by the Founders in Philadelphia in 1787 is as obsolete as the quill pens they used to write it down. Accompanying the interview was a chyron at the bottom of the screen declaring (in all caps): "Scholars Warn Outdated Constitution Has Put Democracy At Risk." And it was scorched on social media:
LINK
Posted on 9/18/23 at 1:23 pm to djmed
The Constitution was drafted with the understanding that “democracy” is an awful way to govern.
Posted on 9/18/23 at 1:28 pm to djmed
Posted on 9/18/23 at 2:05 pm to djmed
quote:
Constitution is 'Outdated, Puts Democracy at Risk'
Sounds like the Constitution is working as intended
Posted on 9/18/23 at 2:05 pm to djmed
It’s not democracy. It’s demo-crazy
Posted on 9/18/23 at 2:08 pm to djmed
Besides the absurd chyron, what did you think of the content of the discussion?
Posted on 9/18/23 at 2:10 pm to djmed
the media is the enemy of America
Posted on 9/18/23 at 2:20 pm to djmed
So does voting from what I hear. We need to streamline our democracy. Do away with the pesky people getting in the way and gumming up our liberty.
Posted on 9/18/23 at 3:22 pm to djmed
Constitution is stable people are not. Fix the people
Posted on 9/18/23 at 3:29 pm to djmed
Conservatives are finally coming around to the fact that constitutions mean jack shite and won’t save you. The constitution has successfully allowed the formation of the largest and most powerful government in human history.
Posted on 9/18/23 at 3:42 pm to djmed
They continue to misspell Democraty.
The constitution really IS a threat to Democraty
The constitution really IS a threat to Democraty
Posted on 9/18/23 at 4:24 pm to djmed
The Constitution IS outdated. It is absurd to claim it's a "threat" to Democracy.
We shouldn't be proud of the fact it's "the oldest written government charter in the world." Thomas Jefferson earned of considering the Constitution a sacred document, and recommended a new Constitutional Convention every 19 or 20 years.
I think every 20 years is a bit much, but surely our Constitution could use updating to match the modern world. Wouldn't it be nice to rarely have to argue over Constitutional interpretation? Every controversial issue could be debated, compromised, and spelled out directly in a new Constitution.
We shouldn't be proud of the fact it's "the oldest written government charter in the world." Thomas Jefferson earned of considering the Constitution a sacred document, and recommended a new Constitutional Convention every 19 or 20 years.
I think every 20 years is a bit much, but surely our Constitution could use updating to match the modern world. Wouldn't it be nice to rarely have to argue over Constitutional interpretation? Every controversial issue could be debated, compromised, and spelled out directly in a new Constitution.
Posted on 9/18/23 at 4:31 pm to djmed
These idiots would probably be surprised to learn the the word "democracy" does not appear in the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution of the United States.
Posted on 9/18/23 at 4:36 pm to Dday63
quote:
Constitution could use updating to match the modern world.
They're called Amendments, Jack.
They're just too hard for you to push your "common sense" agendas through that process, so you want the morons in Congress, that write multi-thousand page bills that nobody reads to do it? Or should Bill Gates re-write it? What about cabinet secretaries? Who do you entrust with such a responsibility?
This post was edited on 9/18/23 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 9/18/23 at 4:37 pm to djmed
The legal notion that the Constitution is a “living” document is what imperils liberty and freedom. Bring back the Articles Of Confederation.
Posted on 9/18/23 at 4:44 pm to djmed
The Constitution is a threat to comfort and CDR, communism done right. It belongs to some old world dudes who believed in principles and morals, right and wrong, good and evil, equality and a host of other outdated ideals that are infringing on the expanse of our loving governance.
Posted on 9/18/23 at 4:52 pm to Dday63
quote:
Wouldn't it be nice to rarely have to argue over Constitutional interpretation?
hell NO!!
What we don't need is the possibility of a bunch of nose-ringed pink haired Linda Has-A-Dicks gathering up millions of ballots in their spare time left over from burning police stations and robbing Walmarts colluding to make us up a brand new "constitutional RIGHT" by 'popular vote.'
It takes sound minded citizens with skin in the game to decide how to mold a set of rules that will be fair to their great-grandchildren --- NOT a brand spanking new set of rules to make every one else pay for your current misadventures.
What we have is as close to perfection as can be molded by human intellect. They even provided methods for updating it should the national sense of 'what is required' change. And changing the way we 'conduct our lives' should NEVER be left up to 'popular vote' = there needs to be an OVER=WHELMING majority of the citizenry to update common laws - and there should strict verification of the citizenry and qualifications of any participating.
Those constitutional 'interpretations' bother you because they pre-date the latest fad emerging from coke-headed university profs who couldn't pour piss out of a boot with the directions on the heel.
Posted on 9/20/23 at 9:18 am to LemmyLives
quote:
They're called Amendments, Jack.
A New Constitution would be one, big, sweeping Amendment, Jack.
We would have to call a Constitutional Convention with representatives from every State to work towards a document the majority can support.
And then 3/4 of the States would have to ratify it for it to become our new Constitution. It isn't just something that would get shoved down our throats.
Posted on 9/20/23 at 9:20 am to Dday63
quote:
And then 3/4 of the States would have to ratify it for it to become our new Constitution. It isn't just something that would get shoved down our throats.
This will never happen.
Back to top

17








