Started By
Message

re: Hunter Biden Lawyers Impersonating Congressional Staff to Remove Derogatory Evidence

Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:20 am to
Posted by LSUFAITHFUL
Member since Oct 2007
1089 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Not just that she lied, but that she did so without even bothering to try to hard on the lie.


She didn’t give them her phone number. Her own declaration says they called her back based on caller ID. Her own declaration also doesn’t say she provided her name.

Regardless, the issue is not whether she identified herself, it’s whether she misled the clerk RE who she represented. Further, did Latham ever file a motion to seal? If she thought it was pulled temporarily (as her story goes) why don’t they ever file the motion? They don’t because they were able to convince the clerk the filing party asked to have it pulled.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39606 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:22 am to
quote:

you hate Joe Biden, so you hate Hunter Biden


I don't hate anyone. I am merely following the logical progression that compulsive liars are lying to us again. I also take an umbrella with me on cloudy days.

I'm here all week folks.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39606 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:23 am to
shill baby, shill!
Posted by Zarkinletch416
Deep in the Heart of Texas
Member since Jan 2020
8421 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:25 am to
Lie, Cheat, Break the Law now, we'll sort out the fallout later. - The Biden Crime Family.

Trump 2024 - Drain the Cesspool
Posted by Konkey Dong
Member since Aug 2013
2168 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:27 am to
Why do you white knight so hard for the Bidens and anything affiliated with them in every single thread?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:28 am to
quote:

Her own declaration also doesn’t say she provided her name.
I did not recognize your name, so I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assumed that you were not one of the disingenuous posters. I would recommend you go back and look at the Declaration. Paragraph 6 in particular.



She specifically states that she gave her name and firm affiliation. She is objectively telling the truth, because the CLERK KNEW HER NAME.
quote:

Did Latham ever file a motion to seal?
something is filed which you believe should not be filed. Your first step is to find out “what can I do immediately?“ She did that. I have no doubt that the motion to seal was in process. Then, an hour later, you get a call that the pleading has in fact been pulled temporarily. The motion that you thought you had to file before midnight, has suddenly become at least a little bit less pressing. You think to yourself, “at least I get to eat dinner and sleep tonight.”. then, another hour or two later, you get an email from the court to show cause or face sanctions. needless to say, your focus shifts again. by this time, the motion to seal has become largely moot. The information that they were trying to protect has now been published in every newspaper in the country
This post was edited on 7/27/23 at 8:47 am
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Why do you white knight so hard for the Bidens and anything affiliated with them in every single thread?
I present alternate explanations for consideration, when others post insane conspiracy theories. Crazy people see that as “shilling.“
This post was edited on 7/27/23 at 8:42 am
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39606 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:46 am to
you presented your "alternate explanations", however implausible, 5 pages ago. Now you are just shilling.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:48 am to
quote:

you presented your "alternate explanations" … 5 pages ago
Crazy people are still arguing with them and asking me specific questions.
This post was edited on 7/27/23 at 8:49 am
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39606 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:50 am to
I’m starting to think he is ASURob
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30056 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:51 am to
If Hunter Bidens team called these events an “unfortunate misunderstanding ” they are 100% lying.

That is exactly what you say when you’ve been caught in a fraud.

Posted by tigerfan 64
in the LP
Member since Sep 2016
3889 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Of course that’s what you think happened. You ALWAYS give the benefit of the doubt to the groomers.

Those "center-right" beliefs always supporting the left.

I figured it out.
If Hank supports and uplifts anything on the left, he thinks his views must "lean" to the right.
Posted by nopants
Luling, La
Member since Aug 2006
886 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:53 am to
quote:

I present alternate explanations for consideration, when others post insane conspiracy theories. Crazy people see that as “shilling.“



Ahh the good old "everyone else is crazy and I'm the only intelligent / sane one here"

The incredible amount of hubris it would take to actually write something like that in public and mean it would be shocking... except it came from you so its par for the course.

Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 8:56 am to
There is no hubris when a counselor in a psych ward states that he is the most-sane person in the room.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39606 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:04 am to
he's a walking, talking "no true Scotsman" fallacy.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:10 am to
quote:

he's a walking, talking "no true Scotsman" fallacy.
PM Admin: Is it ME who “derails” threads by ignoring the substance and diverting every one into a series of personal insults?
This post was edited on 7/27/23 at 10:05 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124266 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:22 am to
quote:

It's possible the clerk made a huge mistake and then played the "oh she misrepresented herself" card.
Except, internal (now published) correspondences between the attorneys indicate the Clerk was under the misimpression at the time of the fact, not after the fact. Now as Hank says, there may have been some confusion in the phone exchange. But the Biden attorney using her own name and phone number does raise miscommunication as a high probability.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30056 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:40 am to
quote:

But the Biden attorney using her own name and phone number does raise miscommunication as a high probability.




Well it gives them plausible deniability that is for sure.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39606 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 10:10 am to
quote:

personal insults

Bitch please. If I had a nickel for every time you disparaged someone's intellect on this forum, I'd OWN the forum
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/27/23 at 10:15 am to
quote:

quote:

personal insults Bitch please.
If I had a nickel for every time you disparaged someone's intellect on this forum, I'd OWN the forum
But can you find even one where I was not insulted first?

The admins obviously do nothing about it.

In your mind, how many times must I tolerate being called a ”pedophile” or some such nonsense without consequence, before I am allowed to respond?
This post was edited on 7/27/23 at 10:18 am
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram