Started By
Message
locked post

U.S. Oil Production Growth’s Path Is Clear

Posted on 1/15/23 at 10:32 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27405 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 10:32 am
quote:

How much will U.S. oil production grow this year—this is the question on a lot of minds, both in the United States itself, and across the world.

After proving it could become a game-changer for the global oil market a decade ago, the U.S. shale patch is once again the focus of attention but this time because it is not growing the way it used to. Instead, U.S. shale drillers are being cautious for the first time since the shale boom began.

Forecasts about U.S. oil production, then, have been largely cautious, too, when analysts saw that shale producers really have no plans to return to growth-at-all-costs mode, no matter the price of oil. Except when they come from the EIA.

In its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook, the Energy Information Administration forecast that oil production in the United States will rise from 11.86 million barrels daily last year to 12.4 million barrels daily this year. It will also rise further to 12.81 million barrels daily in 2024, the EIA said.

What's perhaps more interesting than the growth projection itself is the fact that the EIA expects oil prices to decline over this two-year period. In other words, it expects U.S. shale drillers to ramp up production amid declining prices.

This is in the world of forecasts. Meanwhile, in the world of reality, despite forecasts seeing production growth of some 1 million bpd this year, U.S. producers added just 620,000 bpd to the total national output figure last year. On top of that, production growth slowed towards the end of the year. And it is going to slow down further this year, according to the industry itself.


"Most companies are drilling tier two and tier three inventories now," Pioneer Natural Resources' chief executive Scott Sheffield told Reuters at the end of 2022. "Less quality production is coming out of the Permian, out of the Bakken."


quote:

What's more, there are indications that the oil industry likes its new cautious approach to handling money. And a lot of shale drillers that had been in the red for years are now paying down debt—instead of spending money on production growth.

The Wall Street Journal reported this week that between mid-2019 and mid-2022, the ten largest U.S. shale independents paid down 17 percent of their collective debt, reducing it to $84 billion. The best performers were Occidental Petroleum, which cut its debt load by half, and Marathon Oil Corp, which reduced it by about a quarter over the period.

According to the EIA, U.S. oil production this year will grow by 550,000 barrels daily. According to Pioneer's Sheffield, it would add between 300,000 and 400,000 bpd. Some analysts expect even stronger growth than the EIA, and some expect it to be smaller than Sheffield's forecast.

One could say the mystery remains, but that's only true if one follows official government forecasts, even though they are supposed to be based on industry input. If one follows what the industry itself says, the mystery disappears. Because what the industry has been saying for a while now is that production growth is no priority, even if demand for oil is set to grow.


quote:

Meanwhile, production in the United States almost reached 12.4 million bpd at the end of last year—the forecast average for 2023. The EIA reported at the end of last December that actual oil production for October that year averaged 12.38 million barrels daily, up from 12.31 million barrels daily a month earlier. In other words, what the STEO forecast suggests is that U.S. producers could keep production at around October 2022 levels throughout 2023.

It may indeed turn out that way, too. Over the past two years, U.S. oil producers have become quite sensitive to their shareholders' sentiments and have prioritized them over production growth. And their shareholders have signaled they are happier when they get cash returns rather than reports about record-breaking production.

The climate change and emission reduction narrative is not encouraging more investment in new production, either. It is encouraging emission-reduction pledges and Scope 1, 2, and 3 reduction plans that are, in essence, incompatible with production growth.
What all of this means is that U.S. oil producers are probably preparing for another cautious year of moderate production growth.


LINK
Posted by Rhino5
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2014
30790 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 10:35 am to
Gas was under $2 when Trump was President.

Biden has wrecked this economy.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
76196 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 10:37 am to
quote:

What's perhaps more interesting than the growth projection itself is the fact that the EIA expects oil prices to decline over this two-year period. In other words, it expects U.S. shale drillers to ramp up production amid declining prices.



I thought last week oil execs were saying crude was going to be $150/bbl this year?
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
76196 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 10:39 am to


More data
This post was edited on 1/15/23 at 10:44 am
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
40242 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Gas was under $2 when Trump was President.


TDS
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
42435 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Gas was under $2 when Trump was President.



Locally, not nationally though. The national average was over $2.00 his entire presidency. though it is better than his predecessor and his successor.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61275 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Gas was under $2 when Trump was President.


Yeah I wonder what was going on in the world for those few months when gas was under $2 during his term?

But I agree, Biden and liberals have been idiots about the oil and gas industry in general. There is no disputing that
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
100376 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 10:54 am to
They took it on the chin when oil tanked a few years ago

They’re simply making up for those losses and paying back the lenders who kept them afloat. It’s smart for long term stability. We don’t have an oil friendly administration in DC anyways so it makes the most logical sense
Posted by AllDayEveryDay
Nawf Tejas
Member since Jun 2015
9306 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 12:00 pm to
The O&G playing field leveled out a decade ago. Everyone has the same technology and the same processes. Dumping loads of cash into boom/bust cycles has been replaced with long term stability via slow controlled growth.

Means better job security, I'm ok with it.
Posted by Sgt Tuffnuts
Middle Georgia
Member since Jul 2022
2095 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Gas was under $2 when Trump was President.

Biden has wrecked this economy.


Biden ain't great, but if you're willing to trade another lockdown to be able to fill up for less than 50 dollars, then good for you!
Posted by Sgt Tuffnuts
Middle Georgia
Member since Jul 2022
2095 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

quote:
Gas was under $2 when Trump was President.


Yeah I wonder what was going on in the world for those few months when gas was under $2 during his term?

But I agree, Biden and liberals have been idiots about the oil and gas industry in general. There is no disputing that



"Gas was under 2 dollars" is the right wing male cheerleader equivalent of saying "unemployment was 300 percent higher under Trump" for left wing male cheerleaders. Pandemic cherrypicking smh.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 12:10 pm to
Is that what he was implying?
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
40242 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

Is that what he was implying?


Well yea. Gas only got under $2.00 during an extremely brief period in which a significant percentage of the global economy was shut down almost overnight.

That's what it took to get gasoline under $2.00 a gallon during the Trump administration.
Posted by minister of truth
Somewhere new for 6-12 months
Member since May 2022
1875 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 12:20 pm to
Ok. From the charts posted above it appears to have been below $3/gal Trump’s entire term and almost entirely above $3/gal during idiot’s term

And $5/gal once during bozo’s term
This post was edited on 1/15/23 at 12:22 pm
Posted by GoldenGuy
Member since Oct 2015
12747 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 12:29 pm to
Nobody can get any chemicals to keep wells running anyway.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
76196 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

From the charts posted above it appears to have been below $3/gal Trump’s entire term and almost entirely above $3/gal during idiot’s term


What policy changss did Trump have to make prices skyrocket under his administration?

(Early 2019 and 2021)
This post was edited on 1/15/23 at 12:39 pm
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 1:32 pm to
I take $2 gallon arguments on this board to be pretty much local considering the price of gas in places like the west coast will be substantially higher.

Maybe I am expecting too much from the arguments here
Posted by Dragula
Laguna Seca
Member since Jun 2020
6498 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Biden ain't great


understatement x 1000
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
8893 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Instead, U.S. shale drillers are being cautious for the first time since the shale boom began.


quote:

Instead, U.S. shale drillers are not getting nearly unlimited access to investment capital like they got 10-15 years ago when the shale boom began.
This post was edited on 1/15/23 at 6:41 pm
Posted by minister of truth
Somewhere new for 6-12 months
Member since May 2022
1875 posts
Posted on 1/15/23 at 2:04 pm to
Skyrocketed? Never exceeded $3/gal. Better than his predecessor or successor. I’ll take that skyrocket
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram