- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Don't know why so many are eager for Daniels to go Pro..
Posted on 12/20/22 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 12/20/22 at 3:40 pm
The guy is electric and a hell of a lot of fun to watch.
Guarantee that he would make a big step if he chooses to come back.
If someone transfers, so be it. Enjoy Daniel's while we have him.
Beating Bama is a big deal.
Guarantee that he would make a big step if he chooses to come back.
If someone transfers, so be it. Enjoy Daniel's while we have him.
Beating Bama is a big deal.
This post was edited on 12/21/22 at 6:17 pm
Posted on 12/20/22 at 3:42 pm to bopper50
They rode the short bus to school
Posted on 12/20/22 at 3:42 pm to bopper50
quote:
Don't know why so many are eager for Daniel's to go Pro..
Because he only cares about himself is what this board says, and other coded reasons.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 3:43 pm to bopper50
But he not the Joe Burreaux. We can only like the Joe Burreaux.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 3:43 pm to bopper50
Morons. They want to run off as much talent as possible and turn over the QB reigns to an inexperienced erratic QB. The stupidity amazes me.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 3:45 pm to bopper50
Because he’s a very limited as a passer and there will be a ceiling on the offense until we move on.
If he does come back, I hope he proves us all wrong and turns into a great passer, but I don’t see it.
If he does come back, I hope he proves us all wrong and turns into a great passer, but I don’t see it.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 3:47 pm to bopper50
quote:
Guarantee that he would make a big step if he chooses to come back.
Based off of what?
Posted on 12/20/22 at 3:47 pm to Broski
The "coded" reasons for wanting Nuss are the same reasons they loved Bech and wished him nothing but love and admiration. Positive that if Boutte hit the portal it would have been just the opposite, hatred and ill will. This board is a disgrace and I pray recruits don't read it.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 3:47 pm to Broski
quote:
Because he only cares about himself is what this board says, and other coded reasons.
This is completely made up

He is objectively an overly cautious passer who struggles reading the field and making decisions and transferring the decision to his body making the throws. People are rightly frustrated with all the WR talent we have being underutilized.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 3:48 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
This is completely made up
Until he beat Bama, there were daily threads about how Daniels only cared about his stats.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 3:53 pm to bopper50
I agree 1000%. The guy will be our very successful starter next year and it’ll be Walker Howard after that. That’s why Nuss will transfer. It’s not really rocket science to figure that out.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 3:58 pm to Booper
Daniels had a 3 game stretch where he was outstanding. No reason to believe he can't become more consistent with another year in the system. If he can come close to that stretch consistently, he'll be in New York next year for the Heisman ceremony.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 4:07 pm to bopper50
Have you looked at our receiver room? If you want to be a 3 or 4 loss team then that would be the only reason to want Daniels back. We need a legitimate pocket passer with this receiver core.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 4:09 pm to bopper50
Because they truly think they can predict the future
Posted on 12/20/22 at 4:11 pm to bopper50
They want him to go pro so they can get excited about a guy with a 55% completion percentage and more turnovers than TDs
Posted on 12/20/22 at 4:15 pm to bopper50
Plus: when he has a good game, he carries the team.
Minus: he's a ball hog and too quick to keep it on the option.
I like the "good game" Daniels. I wish he would give it up more often to his backs & receivers, however.
Minus: he's a ball hog and too quick to keep it on the option.
I like the "good game" Daniels. I wish he would give it up more often to his backs & receivers, however.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 4:15 pm to BatonrougeCajun
It does not have anything to do with his ability. There is a fear of losing Nuss or Howard. There is nothing we can really do about that. The coach should go with the strongest player in his mind. There is a chance we lose one of them if not both. Greater chance we lose Nuss. I suspect we would have people lining up to come play qb if spots opened up. This so the new reality of the college game. our coaches cannot play weaker players just because we may lose them.
I do not like Denbrook and have said that before. We probably go with him and JD next year.
We should then be looking for more of what we want in a OC and qb coach for the future.
I do not like Denbrook and have said that before. We probably go with him and JD next year.
We should then be looking for more of what we want in a OC and qb coach for the future.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 4:16 pm to bopper50
quote:
The guy is electric and a hell of a lot of fun to watch.
Sometimes. There are also times when he is incredible frustrating to watch.
quote:
Guarantee that he would make a big step if he chooses to come back.
This is not guarantee. He has been a starter for 4 years.
quote:
Beating Bama is a big deal.
Beating Bama is not the goal of the season.
Bottom line, Daniels is a fine QB, but the offense has a ceiling with him at QB. Winning a national championship is the goal at LSU. Does Daniels limit LSU from doing that? Im not sure, but I think it’s possible.
This post was edited on 12/20/22 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 12/20/22 at 4:19 pm to JohnDeer
quote:I wouldn't "guarantee" it, but I do expect Daniels to improve if he returns. Just my own observations, and my interpretation on both Daniels and Nussmeier...quote:
Guarantee that he would make a big step if he chooses to come back.
Based off of what?
Those who say Daniels is limited as a passer are wrong. He's got plenty enough arm to make the throws, and a good release.
I think Daniels reads the field, but is hesitant to frick up. He's got an almost certain 5+ yard gain (on scramble) built in, so he's cautious and careful with the ball. Too much so for lots of people here. And that does get him into trouble at times, when the opposing defense can cover AND put pressure while spying him.
I think Nussmeier has MORE arm, and he thinks he can complete passes through coverage. I don't think he reads the field well, he just slings it, and there's enough velocity on a lot of those passes that he CAN defeat good coverage.
The thing going forward:
With Daniels, you hope that with a year's familiarity in the offense, and with Boutte, Nabers, Taylor etc, he loosens up and lets the ball go more. There's every reason to think that will be the case, he should have trust in those guys next season.
With Nuss, you would hope he would learn to read the field more, and not just let the ball rip into double coverage "because I got the arm to do so".
My personal take on this, Daniels is safer, and closer to where we want him to be, than Nussmeier is. That's why Kelly chose him to start. I could see Daniels improving his statline by 30 yds a game passing, I'm not as confident that Nussmeier would become a lot more frugal with the ball.
YMMV

Popular
Back to top
