- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Georgia Senate race: Proof of why candidate quality matters
Posted on 12/7/22 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 12/7/22 at 2:55 pm
North Fulton saw close to a 20% swing between the Gov. race last month and the Senate runoff. The Warnock campaign did a great job, while Kemp didn't have Walker's issues.
Kemp carried everything but Sandy Springs. Warnock carried everything but Milton.
- The people voting were the same.
- People running the elections were the same.
- The Dominion machines were the same.
- Lesson: Pay more attention to who you select as the candidate in the primaries.
24
Posted on 12/7/22 at 2:57 pm to saintforlife1
Are you implying that Warnock was a "quality candidate"?
Posted on 12/7/22 at 2:57 pm to saintforlife1
I guess Hershel just magically won the primary, huh?
Posted on 12/7/22 at 2:59 pm to saintforlife1
What about your data addresses candidate quality?
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:02 pm to saintforlife1
Now do the Arizona races
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:02 pm to the808bass
There have been a lot of mediocre to bad major candidates for both parties but there are few who are as shitty as Herschel.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:09 pm to Diseasefreeforall
I’m asking how the data demonstrates that. Thanks for your input. Drive through.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:09 pm to BlackAdam
quote:
Are you implying that Warnock was a "quality candidate"?
Yeah that's the flip side of this goddamn coin that for some reason this board just refuses to see.
You wanna talk about "quality of candidates" when Satanic Warlock "won" in GA, Sling Blade's less functional brother "won" in PA, and Hobbs "won" in AZ after refusing to campaign or debate.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:13 pm to saintforlife1
You are right but you are going to get a bunch of bs in response
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:13 pm to saintforlife1
quote:
Georgia Senate race: Proof of why candidate quality matters
and the FACT that there isnt a democrat in congress with an IQ higher than 50 says you are full of shite
biden said it himself, democrats run the best vote fraud network that anyone has ever seen
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:16 pm to saintforlife1
Just proves one thing to me. Kemp was protected by the fraud machine. Simple.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:17 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
Yeah that's the flip side of this goddamn coin that for some reason this board just refuses to see.
You wanna talk about "quality of candidates" when Satanic Warlock "won" in GA, Sling Blade's less functional brother "won" in PA, and Hobbs "won" in AZ after refusing to campaign or debate.
Seems pretty obvious that Dems will get out and vote for their candidate no matter who it is while Republicans aren't getting out to vote for a shitty candidate. I would have held my nose and voted for Walker if I lived in Georgia, but it's beyond me how he is the best the Republicans in Georgia could come up with.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:18 pm to saintforlife1
And you may be retarded also. Get checked.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:25 pm to saintforlife1
quote:
saintforlife1
You lied about Trump calling for an end to the Constitution.
Then you ran like the coward you are.
You are just another establishment cuckboy!
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:29 pm to saintforlife1
Why would you not use the same election for this comparison? They were all good on the November ballot . Walker is a outsider and outsiders will always struggle to win elections. 90% of politicians don’t want a republican outsider to win .
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:36 pm to saintforlife1
No. It's proof of the power of incumbency. As much as people claim to hate politicians, they hate change even more.
This post was edited on 12/7/22 at 3:38 pm
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:37 pm to BlackAdam
quote:
Are you implying that Warnock was a "quality candidate"?
Seemed like it based on what I read about him. But even so, Walker was a terrible candidate and everyone knew it.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:48 pm to bamarep
quote:
Now do the Arizona races
And then PA.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 3:51 pm to bamarep
quote:
Now do the Arizona races
Why?
It’s almost like they were different elections and Walker underperforming Kemp has nothing to do with anything that happened in Arizona.
Lake wasn’t a bad candidate, she just ran a dumb campaign by spending all of her time trying for sound bites and pandering to people who were always voting for her.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 4:10 pm to BlackAdam
quote:
Are you implying that Warnock was a "quality candidate"?
You are missing the point. You can't control what the other party does or who they nominate. But if the Republicans had nominated a vanilla country club Republican vs. the bozos they actually did, they sure as heck would have won the PA and GA Senate (and possibly AZ) seats and the AZ governorship.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News