re: What we’ve learned, when Coach Kelly says

quote:

---

You seem to have the assumption the only thing wrong with the offense was the QB.
This season is reminiscent of 2018 when Jeaux had doubters until about mid-season when blocking improved, drops reduced and the offense gelled.

---

Correct. I have posted about 10 times that if we can establish the run, Daniels will see favorable matchups.

quote:

---

quote:
Ok.

They weren't fixed until this week. So when Kelly was mad that Daniels was screwing up so bad the last few weeks... Was Kelly a negatiger then?

Are the negatigers in the room with us now? Show me on the mascot where they touched you.

Bruh shut the frick up. Ol sour arse motherfricker. You and The Pirate King would get along just fine. Both of yall aren't happy unless you're miserable. We're a blocked extra point away from being 6-1 and our only loss to a top 5 team in BK's first goddamn year at the helm. Sit down and shut the frick up, bitch

---

quote:

---

So those three years don't really mean much as far as the "process" in this offense.

---

I do not think those three years count for nothing. Your position is that JD5 had, in effect, no starting experience. I disagree.

He looked a lot like that during his entire freshman season.

quote:

---

“We see it differently.”

---

quote:

---

That's great and I'm happy for the uptrend, but that is dismissive of objective criticism

---

quote:

---

Why does it take a QB in his fourth year of starting so long to "trust the process" as you say. Makes no sense to me.

---

He wasn't getting the same coaching at ASU.

quote:

---

Why does it take a QB in his fourth year of starting so long to "trust the process" as you say. Makes no sense to me.

---

Reason #36 you’re not a collegiate football coach.

quote:

---

You seem to have the assumption the only thing wrong with the offense was the QB.

---

This. Daniels showed improvement against Tennessee in many of the areas fans have been screaming about (getting the ball out faster, letting WRs make plays 1-on-1, not bailing from the pocket too soon, etc.) but nobody wanted to see or hear it because of the score.

We went into the game without our starting LT then lost our starting LG in the first half. We couldn’t run the ball to save our lives. Our WRs missed some opportunities to make plays. And yes, Daniels missed some opportunities. Then the score got out of hand.

Regardless, Daniels did play better last week than he had previously. What we saw this week was A) him continuing to improve and B) everything else clicking in the offense.

For some reason people are obsessed with having a single point of accountability for success/failure, particularly on offense. It’s either the QB, or the playcalling, or the OL, etc… but that’s just not reality. It’s a team game and there are a ton of little things that contribute to a quarterback’s success or lack thereof.

It's true, but people like you seem to think that JB9 and JD5 had similar experience but they did not. Can you explain JD's performance this year. He was 100% lost until the Florida game. I do not understand it as he has had plenty of experience starting as a QB.

No one has claimed the O-line hasn't had problems. A huge problem was our QB not finding open receivers which would have won the FSU game and probably made LSU competitive against Tennessee.

I hope his consistency continues. I have also said that if he could really play that LSU would be a contender. Now...piss off, mate.

quote:

---

Taking a half season to get competent in fielding kicks and punts isn't "seeing it differently", it is a fact of taking more time than expected.

Just say that. Own it. It's his first year. A certain amount of that is understandable, "It's taking us longer with certain aspects of offense, special teams and even defense than we anticipated." That's a grownup way to do it as opposed to gaslighting.

---

Wait one there, Ace.
Are you implying that CBK doesn't "own" problems with the team's performance?
Do you think that only because his succinct and diplomatic response to a beat writers question doesn't satisy you?
Do you think that only because he didn't respond to some douche bag writer with a well thought out response that touched on every phase of his football team - and took him 60 or 45 fricking minutes to type into his computer correctly like it did you?
That doesn't seem to be a grownup way to comment on a Press Conference.
The adult at the podium knows what he's saying/doing. 32 years of experience suggests that "We see it differently" is a more than adequate response.
And look up the fricking definition of "Gaslighting" before you use it again, dumbass!