- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Weren't we supposed to be on the moon again* by now?
Posted on 10/4/22 at 8:38 am to Crimson1st
Posted on 10/4/22 at 8:38 am to Crimson1st
quote:
I gotta call BS on this!
Call whatever you want, but there isn't much value in keeping a human alive in space when a machine can do the same work.
1
Posted on 10/4/22 at 8:39 am to Tomatocantender
quote:
USA had a human walk on the moon with Commodore 64 60's technology about the same as Tomatocantender gave Dua Lipa an orgasm with my 6-inch pecker; e.g. Never happened.
Far better odds than you cobbling together a cogent English sentence.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 8:46 am to Ace Midnight
Read Behold a Pale Horse it will answer all of your questions. Moonbases, interstellar travel, the Kennedy assassination, Roswell....it's all there. Nazis too. It's a handbook.
Nordics, Grays, reptilians...it's all there. Read up on the moon settlement. 500K people living there. Eisenhower essentially signing a surrender with the aliens.....scientologists.....Mormons.
Nordics, Grays, reptilians...it's all there. Read up on the moon settlement. 500K people living there. Eisenhower essentially signing a surrender with the aliens.....scientologists.....Mormons.
This post was edited on 10/4/22 at 8:47 am
Posted on 10/4/22 at 8:52 am to jonnyanony
quote:
jonnyanony
You're a special kind of stupid, aren't you?
Posted on 10/4/22 at 8:57 am to Tomatocantender
quote:
You're a special kind of stupid, aren't you?
Read your post again, baw, it's barely English.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 8:59 am to Thundercles
It would seem to me that it we could safely get people on the moon in the '60s using a computer with the power of a pocket calculator... it shouldn't be very difficult to get a person on the moon today, with all the advances in computers.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:00 am to Smeg
quote:
It would seem to me that it we could safely get people on the moon in the '60s using a computer with the power of a pocket calculator... it shouldn't be very difficult to get a person on the moon today, with all the advances in computers.
It isn't difficult, but it's unnecessary.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:01 am to jonnyanony
It would seem to me that if we could easily fake getting people on the moon in the '60s using a computer with the power of a pocket calculator... it shouldn't be very difficult to fake getting a person on the moon today, with all the advances in computers.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:04 am to jonnyanony
quote:
jonnyanony
Oops, looks like someone just forget his alter account made the exact post
You stupid bastard.Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:04 am to jonnyanony
quote:
It isn't difficult, but it's unnecessary
horseshite. NASA claims they "lost the technology" to get to the moon.
I think the real reason so many people are defensive about this, is because they witnessed it on TV when they were young and impressionable. They don't want to believe they "bought into the lie" that was the '60s version of "global warming" or the "threat of COVID". The government has been using the news to bullshite people longer than the last 20 years.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:04 am to Tomatocantender
You're not very perceptive, are you.
Read both of them again. Slowly. Have an adult help you if you need.
Read both of them again. Slowly. Have an adult help you if you need.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:05 am to Thundercles
Over 50 years ago NASA designed a rocket using slide rules and #2 pencils. And the rocket that got us to the moon and back had less computing power than the average pocket calculator of today. This was NASA then…
Shirt & ties, flattops, cigarettes & coffee
Now NASA has computers and technology the guys in the 60s could only dream of yet they can’t even get their rocket off the pad. This is NASA today…
Kinda speaks for itself.
Shirt & ties, flattops, cigarettes & coffee
Now NASA has computers and technology the guys in the 60s could only dream of yet they can’t even get their rocket off the pad. This is NASA today…
Kinda speaks for itself.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:05 am to Smeg
quote:
horseshite. NASA claims they "lost the technology" to get to the moon.
NASA claims this? Or one dude?
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:06 am to MoarKilometers
quote:
I'm gonna have to ask if they're really planning on landing and then relaunching from the lunar surface.
Even if not, it makes no sense to do anything from Lunar orbit that one could not do from LEO. I mean, I suppose there are some rare circumstance where you could time a launch window with the Moon in just the right position, but even then with the infrastructure requirements, the extra calculations/constrains, the juice isn't worth the squeeze.
Bottom line: The only reason to go to the Moon is to do stuff on/around the Moon.
This post was edited on 10/4/22 at 9:07 am
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:07 am to Tomatocantender
quote:
Oops, looks like someone just forget his alter account made the exact post You stupid bastard.
I am not an alter for jonnyanony. My original post was mine. He must have copy/paste it to quote me or something. I certainly didn't repost it under that username.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:07 am to Smeg
quote:
I am not an alter for jonnyanony. My original post was mine. He must have copy/paste it to quote me or something. I certainly didn't repost it under that username.
Y'all, just read it again. It's not that hard.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:07 am to jonnyanony
quote:
You're not very perceptive, are you.
You literally replied to yourself you dumb bastard. Trying to play alter accounts I see. Stupid fvcker. BUSTED
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:08 am to Tomatocantender
quote:
You literally replied to yourself you dumb bastard. Trying to play alter accounts I see. Stupid fvcker. BUSTED
You are incredibly dumb. Read both posts again, see if you can spot the subtle differences.
You actually think smeg and I are the same account. We're disagreeing, you dumbass. Your brain is mush.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:09 am to jonnyanony
quote:
It would seem to me that if we could easily fake getting people on the moon in the '60s using a computer with the power of a pocket calculator... it shouldn't be very difficult to fake getting a person on the moon today, with all the advances in computers.
There's too much of a risk to fake it today because there's enough technology for independent laypeople to double check if it really just happened. The lie could be disproven much easier today as opposed to the '60s.
Posted on 10/4/22 at 9:10 am to Smeg
quote:
There's too much of a risk to fake it today because there's enough technology for independent laypeople to double check if it really just happened. The lie could be disproven much easier today as opposed to the '60s.
Ok, so ... this advanced tech could disprove the fakes used with advanced tech but not footage and evidence from the 1960s? This is what you're going with?
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News