- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump lawyers object to verifying list of property seized from Florida estate Mar-A-Lago
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:01 am to tigerfan 64
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:01 am to tigerfan 64
There are probably 7 OMB MSN articles just from this morning.
Today's THIS JUST THE FRICK IN BOMBSHELL:
Is that Trump's shrink Maggie Haberman (Trump is a dumbass to give her interviews but I think he does it just to frick with everyone-but it is old) Said that in Trump's first few weeks as President there was some big thing and Trump asked one of the black democrats to bring out the Hors d’oeuvres.
If this is true. I saw that Obama was confused with all the black butlers/servers/chefs in the WH as well.
Today's THIS JUST THE FRICK IN BOMBSHELL:
Is that Trump's shrink Maggie Haberman (Trump is a dumbass to give her interviews but I think he does it just to frick with everyone-but it is old) Said that in Trump's first few weeks as President there was some big thing and Trump asked one of the black democrats to bring out the Hors d’oeuvres.
If this is true. I saw that Obama was confused with all the black butlers/servers/chefs in the WH as well.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:02 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Trump's not going to be blindsided by some random document
So the he GSA mole that packed the Trump boxes for Strzok didn’t slip any extra papers in that Trump didn’t know about?
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:03 am to tigerfan 64
quote:
Please share your point of view with the MSM and social media.
They just can't quit him
I should have clarified
No one that matters
The MSM is of course obsessed as are his most ardent followers
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:04 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
So the he GSA mole that packed the Trump boxes for Strzok didn’t slip any extra papers in that Trump didn’t know about?
a. This declaration won't have a declaration for literally every page taken. It's going to list the documents by grouping/title. If the government was going to be that evil, this declaration is irrelevant.
b. What would they gain by "slipping in" papers? And how would acknowledging the paperwork taken have any effect on this? Serious questions.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:06 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Also: Some of Trump's lawyers are getting clearances via the FBI/DOJ. Yet the documents marked classified are not classified as per Trump's declassification?
You're almost there.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:10 am to BamaAtl
quote:
You're almost there.
Hey look, another one of those bitches that Trump broke!
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If the government was going to be that evil,
Bruh, you seriously aren’t gonna qualify this statement with “if”.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:13 am to Meauxjeaux
Then replace evil with stupid
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Then replace evil with stupid
Stupid like, Clinesmith level stupid or Ray Epps level stupid?
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:16 am to AndyCBR
Look at the pearl clutching that Trump fired his new lead lawyer. They are literally making up stories much less that it is accurate.
https://www.newsweek.com/why-did-trump-bench-chris-kise-his-newest-legal-team-add-experts-weigh-1746819
Also I think Chris had to quit his law firm and asked for 2 million not 3 million?
https://www.newsweek.com/why-did-trump-bench-chris-kise-his-newest-legal-team-add-experts-weigh-1746819
Also I think Chris had to quit his law firm and asked for 2 million not 3 million?
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What would they gain by "slipping in" papers? And how would acknowledging the paperwork taken have any effect on this? Serious questions.
When Trump “verifies” 1000 pages they are going to say look! 1,005 pages! Then the whole of Twitter will shout how Trump fraudulently tried to hide docs he stole.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:19 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
When Trump “verifies” 1000 pages they are going to say look! 1,005 pages! Then the whole of Twitter will shout how Trump fraudulently tried to hide docs he stole.
If Trump verifies 1000 pages offered by the DOJ and then later the DOJ shows up with 1005, the DOJ is going to be in some major shite, not Trump.
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 10:20 am
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:29 am to SlowFlowPro
It came out in court already that The FBI did not follow proper procedure. They took things unrelated to POTUS work & archives.
They were slap happy and took passports, medical records, Trump's Last Will & Testament.
Common sense prevails they had no proper chain of custody. It was cited by I believe Judge Cannon, as one of the reasons she called for a SM.
They were slap happy and took passports, medical records, Trump's Last Will & Testament.
Common sense prevails they had no proper chain of custody. It was cited by I believe Judge Cannon, as one of the reasons she called for a SM.
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 10:30 am
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:30 am to Powerman
quote:
No one cares about Trump anymore
But here we are with Trump rallies, interviews, on the front page of every newspaper and MSN website everyday and the most powerful law enforcement agency in the world after Trump. But other than that no one cares about Trump.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Trump verifies 1000 pages offered by the DOJ and then later the DOJ shows up with 1005, the DOJ is going to be in some major shite, not Trump.
Which brings us back to my original point. Gov at all levels has a history of withholding information from defendants and springing it at the last minute and taking the judicial wrist slap.
In this case , DOJ says oops and takes the wrist slap while Trump gets indicted for obstruction. He verified 1000. He shoulda said 1,005.
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 10:31 am
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:34 am to Powerman
quote:
Please share your point of view with the MSM and social media.
They just can't quit him
I should have clarified
No one that matters
The MSM is of course obsessed as are his most ardent followers
I think in regards to who matters the most, the media entities absolutely matter the most.
They create, propagate and perpetuate the propaganda assault against DJT.
Their influence and control of the mis/dis information narratives allow carte blanche narrative seeding. They are the "fact checkers".
DJTs most ardent detractors are beyond obsessed.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:35 am to GumboPot
Powerman is being overly obtrusive in citing a weeks old talking point about Trump.
This is far beyond Trump. This is about the supposed premiere law enforcement needing dismantled.
This is far beyond Trump. This is about the supposed premiere law enforcement needing dismantled.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:35 am to SlowFlowPro
T
quote:
he government provides you a list of items they took and you're verifying that's what they took.
It's not as onerous as you're making it out to be.
The Trump lawyers asked for a checklist when they took it. His lawyers said some were specific, some was very non descript and the FBI said "they will get back to them".
They apparently then submitted this "list" to the judge and Trump's lawyers asked for a digitized full inventory......and the FBI says they dont have the manpower or can contract someone to do it?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Red flag, Red flag, Red FLag.........
That is what is "not onerous" and very curious why a simple task cannot be fulfilled, it is obviously by design. They miss one document and they lied to the court, they tried to hide the fact they took it, etc etc.
The classified angle wont work, just like the nuclear secrets did not work.....so they are going for the ole tried and true process crime of lies to the FBI because they did not list 1 of over 10,000 documents.
By the way, you bet your arse the FBI digitized this stuff within 24 hours of siezing it for fear a judge would tell them to return it.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 10:36 am to SlowFlowPro
T
quote:
he government provides you a list of items they took and you're verifying that's what they took.
It's not as onerous as you're making it out to be.
The Trump lawyers asked for a checklist when they took it. His lawyers said some were specific, some was very non descript and the FBI said "they will get back to them".
They apparently then submitted this "list" to the judge and Trump's lawyers asked for a digitized full inventory......and the FBI says they dont have the manpower or can contract someone to do it?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Red flag, Red flag, Red FLag.........
That is what is "not onerous" and very curious why a simple task cannot be fulfilled, it is obviously by design. They miss one document and they lied to the court, they tried to hide the fact they took it, etc etc.
The classified angle wont work, just like the nuclear secrets did not work.....so they are going for the ole tried and true process crime of lies to the FBI because they did not list 1 of over 10,000 documents.
By the way, you bet your arse the FBI digitized this stuff within 24 hours of siezing it for fear a judge would tell them to return it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News