Started By
Message

re: If the US navy blew up this pipeline, is that an act of war?

Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:38 pm to
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32516 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

Float? Is this a LNG pipeline? I get where your coming from but if the Russians wanted it to be cut off they’d just stop the supply (costing them $billions in sales).


Push/pull them with something, whatever it takes to get them in position to kaboom! Force Germany to open up NS2.
Posted by Hickok
Htown
Member since Jan 2013
2877 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

100m deep

quote:

100 foot

quote:

times like this makes you realize you are hearing from kids with computer game experience

Kids know the difference between feet and meter nerd
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45963 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

actually any oilfield diver would feel good about working at the shallow depth. Would require two tanks of air minimum
Good lord, you are ignorant. 100 meters is a highly technical, dangerous dive requiring more than two tanks of "air". An oilfield diver would know that. Any experienced diver would take extreme caution and not do it alone, either.
Posted by DaBull
DaSunset, Louisiana
Member since Jul 2013
143 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:49 pm to
Easy. Underwater ROV launched from a far. Drop off explosives with a timer attached. ROV returns to sub or ship. Ka Boom.
Posted by Goonie02
Member since Dec 2019
2591 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

The nordstream pipeline is only about 100m deep. Any decent diver with a scuba tank could reach it. Hell, some people could free dive it.

100m is over 300 feet deep. that is a very technical dive which will require different mixture of gas and a very skilled diver.

Posted by Hickok
Htown
Member since Jan 2013
2877 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

Push/pull them with something, whatever it takes to get them in position to kaboom! Force Germany to open up NS2

So now we are from “floating” explosives to pushing or pulling them… all the while, the Russians who you think did it, that supply the gas line could just turn it off with out “floating, pulling, or pushing” explosives.. just doesn’t make sense.

And to cover my arse I have no idea who did it, just thinking the people selling the gas would rather shut it off before pushing, pulling, or floating explosives to blow up the pipe that supplies them with billions in revenue.
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
6678 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

our esteemed CIA would do it, not the military. Gotta maintain a veneer of separation for deniability


CIA doesn't have subs. Most likely explanation is submarines and SEALS.
Posted by Prettyboy Floyd
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Dec 2013
15846 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

So your suspect list is probably only about 9 million people


Except that our president is on video talking about talking about taking it out.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
148119 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 9:59 pm to
Yes, but the Biden admin is in a proxy war with Russia already and has been doing color revolutions around the world with Obama, McCain, Graham, Biden, HRC.

So the playing the piano with his penis jackass getting billions bi-weekly, is the Biden versus Russia proxy war.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46676 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

No more an act of war than China releasing a plague on the USA through carrier agents.


If only it was simply the CCP unleashing the Wuhan virus…we had Americans working with the CCP and the Wuhan Lab of Virology. If something like this fricking shite happened 50-60 years ago Fauci, Collins and a few more rat bastards would be in leg irons facing life in prison or execution
Posted by Rufus T Firefly
Member since Aug 2022
483 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:15 pm to
Yes and not the first time the US regime has promulgated terrorism
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29788 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:16 pm to
Yes
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15361 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:17 pm to
Its an act of war against the actual german people.
Posted by BFIV
Virginia
Member since Apr 2012
7798 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

What Navy’s have the capabilities to put this much dynamite on it and blow it up?


Don't know who did it or what happened, but our Navy just recovered an F-18 from 9500 feet below the surface. So, yeah, we have the ability to do this easily, as do some other navies.
Posted by ItNeverRains
37069
Member since Oct 2007
25919 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

No. It’s a blow against “globalism.”


The nuanced crew does not appreciate this humor.
Posted by Texaggie96
Member since Dec 2018
1381 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

Except that our president is on video talking about talking about taking it out.


please he said that in February about NS2 which incidentally ended and never went live. Trying to correlate the two together is just reaching.

He also said he'd end Keystone XL and I didn't hear about Seal Team 6 bombing it.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22189 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

100m is over 300 feet deep. that is a very technical dive which will require different mixture of gas and a very skilled diver.


Ain't nobody freediving it, but it's not super technical and just needs some tri-mix. It wouldn't require any special equipment and about any military with a diving capability could pull it off. It's not standard scuba but plenty of civilians dive that deep.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41297 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

Radek Sikorski MEP
@radeksikorski
Thank you, USA.


Former Polish Defense Minister, current chair of EU-US delegation
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22189 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

CIA doesn't have subs. Most likely explanation is submarines and SEALS.


CIA has been putting people on military subs for decades. SEALS are typically shallower depths than that and it would require training out of the norm. They could do it but we have people already trained for deep submergence stuff.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119507 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

Is this a LNG pipeline?


No. There are no long range LNG pipelines.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram